Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VX nerve gas- What the White House said vs. the evidence.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:04 PM
Original message
VX nerve gas- What the White House said vs. the evidence.
Former UNSCOM head Richard Butler wrote that "a missile warhead of the type Iraq has made and used can hold some 140 liters of VX <...>. A single such warhead would contain enough of the chemical to kill up to 1 million people.""

Condoleezza Rice, "Why We Know Iraq is Lying", New York Times, 23 January 2003: "Iraq has also failed to provide United Nations inspectors with documentation of its claim to have destroyed its VX stockpiles."

Secretary Powell, 5 February 2003: "It took years for Iraq to finally admit that it had produced four tons of the deadly nerve agent, VX.

DOES THAT JUSTIFY WAR WHEN EVERYONE QUOTED HERE SAW THIS DOCUMENT?

The IISS (International Institute of Strategic Studies) strategic dossier of September 2002 records the status of VX produced before the Gulf War: "Any VX produced by Iraq before 1991 is likely to have decomposed over the past decade <...>. Any G-agent or V-agent stocks that Iraq concealed from UNSCOM inspections are likely to have deteriorated by now." (pp. 52 and 53).

Chipping away at the Shite House one lie at a time.

http://www.iiss.org/ (click on the link and see a pretty picture of Rummy making a presentation to the Institute two weeks ago...it's hard to discredit them now huh?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Imagine if a country such as Iran was on our border... that had engaged in
a bloody war with us for a time... that had used chemical weapons against us.... do ya think that we might have or want to have some chemical deterrents of our own??

Short answer: We would have thousands and thousands of tons of it... and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We do have. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes.... Canada and Mexico are extreeeemly scarey.... BOO!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Mexico shouldn't have made those Tabasco Bombs...
or we could do away with our biological warheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC