and that takes balls.
Would someone please tell JINSA that they don't speak for the Jewish Community? Lord have mercy.
This is like the Christian Coalition saying that not backing Ashcroft is offensive to the Christian Community. We can't let these right-wing groups keep hijacking our religions and pretending to speak for us! And I think that's precisely what Boxer is telling JINSA.
Barbara, We've got your back!!!
===
Bolton Delay Offensive to Jewish Community, Says JINSA
6/20/2005 12:05:00 PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To: National Desk
Contact: Jim Colbert of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, 202-667-3900
WASHINGTON, June 20 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The ongoing effort by John Bolton's Senate detractors to hold up his confirmation as UN ambassador is especially offensive to the Jewish community, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs declared today.
"It was Bolton's determined leadership and diplomatic mastery that, in 1991, caused the United Nations to finally revoke one of its most outrageous resolutions - equating Zionism with racism," said JINSA executive director Tom Neumann. "It was a truly Herculean task, but Bolton succeeded where many predecessors had failed because he made the effort and took the time to engage the UN members one by one.
"The Jewish community will always be grateful," Neumann noted. "We should remind our elected representatives of that."
Neumann described the Senate delay as "a blatantly orchestrated effort to destroy a dedicated, highly qualified public servant. Bolton's career is an open book, his achievements a matter of record. His style is a mix of diplomacy and resoluteness, with a strong moral sense of right and wrong. There is no valid reason that he should not have been confirmed weeks ago.
"John Bolton at the UN would continue the proud, standup tradition established by our two foremost past UN ambassadors, the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Jeane Kirkpatrick. The latter has warmly endorsed Bolton for the post, as have former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger, Senator John McCain, and many others who clearly understand the need for UN reform."
The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs is an independent, non-partisan educational organization established in 1976 to educate the public on national and international security issues, including the importance of an effective U.S. defense capability and the key role of strategic allies to promote democratic values in the Middle East.
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=49090===
JINSA Report:
April 15, 2005
JINSA Report #484
Don’t Let Them Kill it in Committee
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee has postponed its vote on whether or not to send the nomination of John Bolton for U.S. Ambassador to the UN to the Senate floor.
Why? Surely not because Senators need more information about Mr. Bolton’s government career; it’s an open book. Surely not because Senators need more information about some alleged personal impropriety; no one is alleging any. Surely not because Senators need more information about Mr. Bolton’s views of the UN and the role he believes it can and should play (or cannot and should not play) in international diplomacy; he has spent hours on that with them.
No.
Some Senators want the delay to buy time to change the vote of one Senator in hopes of killing the nomination in Committee - because it would pass on the Senate floor. This is similar to the tactic that has been successfully used to delay votes on federal judges. Opponents of Mr. Bolton are abusing the Advise and Consent function of the Constitution and inter alia dashing hopes for real reform of the UN and depriving Israel and its supporters of a strong ally in the fight for Israel’s legitimization in the international arena.
Supporters of Israel should insist that Mr. Bolton’s nomination move forward to a vote of the whole Senate and insist that it pass.
(snip)
Supporters of Israel should make it clear to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that we share Mr. Bolton’s skepticism about UN activities and capabilities. And that his principled positions on behalf of Israel, which are shared by the President who nominated him to the post, are positions that we share as well.
(snip)
http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/650/documentid/2922/history/3,2359,650,2922