DSMDSMDSM DSMDSMDSMDSMDSM DSMDSMDSMDSMDSMDSM DSMDSMDSMDSM DSMDSMDSMDSMDSM

[jobycom]

That's what we I want to hear.

[OrlandoGator]

1. The Dems in the flag burning debate should only talk DSM.

Just as a kick in the balls to this attempted deflection.

[Barad Simith]

2. We I do too

:hi:

[helderheid]

4. I she be your girlfriend!

[Barad Simith]

8. You she are teasing I he

[KittyWampus]

3. d Prefer To Hear About the 9 BILLION Stolen In Iraq By GOP Cronies

and the simultaneous fact that our troops don't have the armor or machine guns they need.

[jobycom]

5. Okay, I'll listen to that, too. It segs with the DSM

Rather than distracting from the message.

Put the heat on Bush, and the flag amendment, which may not be the problem we assume, anyway, gets lost in the shuffle.

[KittyWampus]

7. Jobycom, DSM won't damage anyone else but Bush & a few in his admin

The corruption in Iraq can't be spun and it reaches into the entire GOP.

[jobycom]

10. But until Bush is gone or politically incapacitated

We won't get any meaningful investigations into the corruption. We have to overturn the whole hierarchy to win anyof our battles.

[oasis]

6. "No war plans" G.W. Bush (eom)

[Octafish]

9. While you're at it, bring up The Washington Post.

They make a fine example of what's wrong with Corporate McPravda.

The Washington Post and the Downing Street memo

By Joseph Kay and Barry Grey
22 June 2005

EXCERPT...

The enormous publicity given the memo in Britain stood in the sharpest contrast to the virtual silence it evoked in the American media—a silence for which there is no innocent explanation. The “mainstream” media made a calculated political decision to bury the memo and keep the American people in the dark.

The memo provides irrefutable evidence, from the highest levels of the British state, that the March 2003 invasion of Iraq was launched on the basis of lies concocted to justify a predetermined policy. Among the lies were the repeated assurances of Bush and other top US government officials in the months and weeks preceding the war that no decision had been made to go to war and the US was exhaustively pursuing all peaceful alternatives.

SNIP...

But the Washington Post, the capital’s leading “liberal” newspaper, not only relegated Conyers’s hearing to its inside pages, it published a sneering and derogatory account that did not seek to conceal the newspaper’s fury over the congressman’s attempt to break through the wall of silence on the memo.

The World Socialist Web Site is no political supporter of Conyers, a Democratic politician who has worked for decades to maintain the subordination of American workers to the two-party system. Nevertheless, his treatment at the hands of the Post is quite extraordinary. The newspaper casts Conyers, one of the most senior members of Congress, as a buffoon, in order to denigrate the anti-war and anti-Bush sentiments expressed by the participants at his hearing.

To underline its attitude to both the hearing and the Downing Street memo itself, the Post published its account in its June 17 “Washington Sketch” column—a feature usually devoted to lighthearted commentary on the peccadilloes and curiosities of political life in the nation’s capital. Written by veteran Post journalist Dana Milbank, the column was headlined “Democrats Play House to Rally Against the War.”

CONTINUED...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jun2005/post-j22.shtml

[kliljedahl]

11. Me you agree with us I

Keith’s Barbeque Central

[jobycom]

12. It them would hurt. I you want that.