Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It is flag Desecration, not just flag Burning.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:23 AM
Original message
It is flag Desecration, not just flag Burning.
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 12:25 AM by uppityperson
I'm thinking this could mean no more tattered car antenna flags allowed, no more clothing flags, no more flaggie disposable diapers, no more flaggie stickers partially removed, no more flaggie stamps since they just get thrown away after the envelope is received, no more lots of flaggie things. I still don't like it, but am concerned that the focus is so much on Burning, and not Desecration.

edited for typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. No more this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly. Desecration takes many forms. It is NOT just burning.
It may seem small potatoes semantically, but there is a big difference between desecration and and burning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Some Senator should blow this picture up for the floor debate.
There's a better picture that shows that it really is * signing the flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeh, but they won't enforce it against the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. desecration is like pornography
you know it when you see it.

That's why this admendment makes me nervous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That is a big problem. Burning is simpler to define.
Fire=burning. Desecration=?

If it were to pass (still need Senate then States to ratify) and IF the right group got into power, could stop the flag from being used most everywhere. I am very much against this amendment, just trying to figure out any positive points and re-emphasizing that we need to use the right word-desecration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's where "intent" is relevant.
And who decides that?

A tattered flag on an antenna with a Boosh sticker is OK.
A tattered flag on an antenna with a Democratic sticker is "desecration."

Furthermore, this whole thing is about "consecrating" a National Symbol. It's about Christianizing the Nation. The Christianists already got "under God" into the pledge. This is just another step in merging Church and State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ah, aren't there more relevant matters?
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 12:48 AM by Erika
Who is making a big Issue of flag desecration? I emailed my GOP DC reps that perhaps they should address issues such as low wages and the uninsured instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baron j Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Odd, considering that burning is the proper way of disposing the flag:

Federal Flag Code

http://www.bcpl.net/~etowner/flagcode.html


"...(k) The Flag, when it is in such condition that it is no longer a fitting emblem for display, should be destroyed in a dignified way, preferably by burning..."


I took a peek at those awful Yahoo! message boards for an article regarding the proposed flag amendment, and many of the idiots there were posting "libs this, libs that, blah, blah, love burning the flag, etc", so I posted: "Libs burn flag. Cons scorch earth".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Funny how jingoistic grandstanding by political hacks
...conceals the ironic truth. How many times is this hackneyed manipulation trotted out? I guess it had its heyday when it became obvious we were losing the Vietnam War. When I say obvious I mean obvious to joe sixpack.

Why pass a law you know is unconstitutional? Oh our reps don't know about a Constitution or their oath of office. They forgot about it after the Reichstag fire, ...er..I mean 911.

Ever hear anyone in Congress calling for results on the anthrax (Congressional assassination attempts) investigation? I wonder why that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baron j Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah, I'm still wondering about the anthrax letters investigation.
How soon people forget all the frightful missives warning us about mail with greasy spots on it, missing return addresses, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baron j Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Sorry! double post
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 03:30 AM by baron j
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
queeg Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. So this means
That if I happen to see a flag burning, I can't piss on it to put it out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. then let's frame it
Every time somebody talks about this, they should ONLY talk about the desecration part. Either how hard it is going to be to draw the line in regards to clothing and the rest; or, how glad you are that all those people who are exploiting the flag will have to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Exactly. Good succinct framing of the Desecration part.
Problem is Not libruls burning the flag, problem is defining desecration, good part is psuedo-patriots will stop exploiting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC