Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems Introduce Legislations to Ban Desecration of the Purple Heart Medal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:24 AM
Original message
Dems Introduce Legislations to Ban Desecration of the Purple Heart Medal
In an attempt to show the Republicans that the Democrats cannot be out "patrioted", Democratic Congressmen introduced an Amendment to the Constitution that would make it a federal crime to desecrate the Purple Heart Medal and the men and women who have earned it.

Speaking for the legislation, top Democrats said; "this is a symbol of our country, meant to honor those that have paid the ultimate sacrifice to the cause of freedom". "Some of these brave heroes left all on the battlefield, and some still carry the scars of injuries sustained in battle while defending this great country of ours".

Specifically banned by the Amendment would be the creation of Purple Heart band-aids that could be worn on the fat, sweaty, pasty faces of "chickenhawks" that were deaf when their nation called.

Said top Democrats; "I think it is past time that this symbol of sacrifice was protected". "Next thing you know, we'll be making ace bandages out of Purple Hearts, or putting Purple Heart Medals on rolls of 2-ply toilet paper". "I don't think the American people will stand for that". "We must protect this symbol".

In other developing news, Democrats in the Senate don't seem ready to let the Republican Party hide behind the flag so quickly. Leading Senate Democrats will offer Amendments to the Flag Desecration Amendment to ensure the penalty for desecration is DEATH! Republicans had hoped only for a 10 year jail sentence, or 1,000 hours in front of a TV showing only Fox News, but once again, they were check-mated by the Democrats who refuse to be "out-patrioted". The amendment calling for death for desecration of the flag was expected to pass by a wide margin. Said the Republican Senate Leader; "Look, we know our base. No Republican is going to vote against this death amendment so that it can be used against us in the next election cycle". "We don't want to go home and have to hear how much we hate America".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bravo. Yeah, that could happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. I demand that you apologize
:sarcasm:

Seriously: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Does that make it deathecration ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. ROFL!!!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great point!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. while i applaud the democrats' efforts to fight them on their own turf,
i am loathe to applaud a proposal for a further erosion of fundamental rights.

what if the republicans "compromise" and agree to make the amendment ban BOTH flag AND purple heart desecration? what exactly have we gained then?

yes, i understand that this is really just a political maneuver, and the odds of it becoming part of the constitution are very, very poor. but the strategy is a poor one because the republicans can simply embrace the proposal.


i would have preferred to see a proposal, say, that applied only to federal officeholders and perhaps candidates that prevented THEM from wrapping themselves in the flag or otherwise abusing our national symbols. THAT would really have put republicans in a box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ummmm. It was Meant to be Satirical.
Although I personally think it would be a great idea for some Dem with a spine to "poke the Repukes in the eye" with an Amendment like this.

My post was only satire, designed to show the complete idiocy of the Repukes "wrapping themselves in the flag, again".

On a bright note, the morning Am local talk show that runs all the "wing-nut" hate speech had a poll question today about the Flag Amendment. It was running 80-20 against the Flag Amendment...and these are people that listen to Rush and Insanity for 42 hours a week!!!

Like it's been said; "patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Great satire...but I think with what has happened to America today
it has become thusly satire is news and news is reported as satire.(see the daily show) I check for a link, and then I check the properties to see if it leads to the Onion! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I'm Going to Send it to My Local Paper
as an LTTE. Wonder if they'll print it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. oops. that'll learn me good to reply before reading the ENTIRE post
and as for patriotism being the last refuge of scoundrels, with all due respect, sir, it is the first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I Think You Are Right About it Being the FIRST!!
Excellent post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeekMonkey Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. The First or the Frist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. i can't take credit for that one
i think it's an ambrose bierce quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toby109 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. Can we make it retroactive to say
August-September of 2004?

Nice satire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. I love it!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wahoo!
Great idea. I know exactly who I can use this on. :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC