Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today's Eminent Domain Ruling--a Native American perspective.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:33 PM
Original message
Today's Eminent Domain Ruling--a Native American perspective.
Standing Bear, Ponca Chief
On the forced removal from their lands in Nebraska: "We told them we would rather die than leave our lands; but we could not help ourselves. They took us down. Many died on the road. Two of my children died. After we reached the new land, all my horses died. The water was very bad. All our cattle died; not one was left. I stayed until one hundred and fifty-eight of my people had died. Then I ran away with thirty of my people, men and women and children. Some of the children were orphans. We were three months on the road. We were sick and weak and starved. When we reached the Omaha Reserve the Omahas gave us a piece of land, and we were in a hurry to plough it and put in wheat. While we were working, the soldiers came and arrested us. Half of us were sick. We would rather have died than be carried back; but we could not help ourselves."

http://home.ptd.net/~nikki/indian.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Apples and oranges
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 06:39 PM by pmbryant
Are you suggesting that all eminent domain, even where the government provides just compensation (as in today's case, but obviously contrary to the case of Native Americans), should be forbidden?

--Peter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh, I wasn't suggesting anything, just
trying to gain some perspective on the issue by remembering how the current owners got in the land in the first place and trying to see how people might feel when their land it taken because of this ruling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Eminent Domain
The two cases have a few similarities. 1. The government forced people off of their own land. 2. In both cases, the government said that it was all for the common good, or the march of progress, etc.

"Just compensation" is a relative term. The public works dept offered a mere pittance of the value of the land that my grandparents owned. We had to take it court to get anything like its value.

The power of those with the most money must be curbed; otherwise, the people of this country will suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC