Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

anyone else have a bad feeling?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:35 PM
Original message
anyone else have a bad feeling?
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 09:39 PM by Adenoid_Hynkel
it just feels like something is about to break. bush is at an all-time low in approval. they're throwing distractions out left and right, but they're not working. hell, even the jackson verdict fizzled out pretty quick

the tension is so thick you can cut it with a knife. it's that same feeling I get every time this crowd of neocons gets ready to do something really, really evil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. it does feel like we're waiting for the other shoe to drop
please focus on DSM, coingate, etc - it could be what is about to happen is something incredible for us like a major break in the media when they realize Bush is a liability they no longer can afford. Try to stay positive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. it feels like it could go either way
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 09:51 PM by Adenoid_Hynkel
these guys finally go overboard until even the avergae republican gives up or they initiate the motgher of all distractions (invasion of iran, mihop 2, etc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. the tide is turning
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerie, silence and calm, like before the storm. we need to be ready for what they throw our way. desperados
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. he stole 2004
we are the majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I beg to differ
First, the 2004 election results forum on Democratic Underground is a great place to check out. Read anything and everything by "TruthIsAll":

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203


More interesting links:

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/1970/
http://www.VelvetRevolution.us#020505 <-- video
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%2218%2C181+votes%22&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-tab-web-t&fl=0&x=wrt

20 Amazing Facts About Voting in the USA

Did you know....

1.80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies: Diebold and ES&S.

http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diebold

2.There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.

http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0916-04.htm
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html

3.The vice-president of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers.

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/private_company.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html

4.The chairman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was “committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/28/sunday/main632436.shtml
http://www.wishtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=1647886

5.Republican Senator Chuck Hagel used to be chairman of ES&S. He became Senator based on votes counted by ES&S machines.

http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2004/03/03_200.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/031004Fitrakis/031004fitrakis. .html

6.Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, long-connected with the Bush family, was recently caught lying about his ownership of ES&S by the Senate Ethics Committee.

http://www.blackboxvoting.com/modules.php?name=News&file=articl le&sid=26
http://www.blackboxvoting.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=26 www.hillnews.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx http://www.onlisareinsradar.com/archives/000896.php

7.Senator Chuck Hagel was on a short list of George W. Bush’s vice-presidential candidates.

http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_28/b3689130.htm http://theindependent.com/stories/052700/new_hagel27.html

8.ES&S is the largest voting machine manufacturer in the U.S. and counts almost 60% of all U.S. votes.

http://www.essvote.com/HTML/about/about.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting/042804Landes/042804landes.html

9.Diebold’s new touch screen voting machines have no paper trail of any votes. In other words, there is no way to verify that the data coming out of the machine is the same as what was legitimately put in by voters.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm
http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/041020evotestates/pfindex.html

10.Diebold also makes ATMs, checkout scanners, and ticket machines, all of which log each transaction and can generate a paper trail.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-05.htm
http://www.diebold.com/solutions/default.htm

11.Diebold is based in Ohio. http://www.diebold.com/aboutus/ataglance/default.htm

12.Diebold employed 5 convicted felons as senior managers and developers to help write the central compiler computer code that counted
50% of the votes in 30 states.

http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,61640,00.html
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/301469.shtml

13.Jeff Dean, Diebold’s Senior Vice-President and senior programmer on Diebold’s central compiler code, was convicted of 23 counts of felony theft in the first degree.

http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

14.Diebold Senior Vice-President Jeff Dean was convicted of planting back doors in his software and using a “high degree of sophistication” to evade detection over a period of 2 years.

http://www.chuckherrin.com/HackthevoteFAQ.htm#how
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-8.pdf

15.None of the international election observers were allowed in the polls in Ohio.

http://www.globalexchange.org/update/press/2638.html
http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/10/26/loc_elexoh.html

16.California banned the use of Diebold machines because the security was so bad. Despite Diebold’s claims that the audit logs could not be hacked, a chimpanzee was able to do it. (See the movie here http://blackboxvoting.org/baxter/baxterVPR.mov .)

http://wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,63298,00.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4874190

17.30% of all U.S. votes are carried out on unverifiable touch screen voting machines with no paper trail.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/07/28/sunday/main632436.shtml

18.All - not some - but all the voting machine errors detected and reported in Florida went in favor of Bush or Republican candidates.

http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65757,00.html
http://www.rise4news.net/extravotes.html
http://www.ilcaonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News& ;file=article&sid=950
http://www.ilcaonline.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News& ;file=article&sid=950 http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0411/S00227.htm

19.The governor of the state of Florida, Jeb Bush, is the President’s brother.

http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/tallahassee/news/local/7628725.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10544-2004Oct29.html

20.Serious voting anomalies in Florida - again always favoring Bush - have been mathematically demonstrated and experts are recommending further investigation.

http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/sto ory/0,10801,97614,00.html
http://www.uscountvotes.org/

TruthIsAll (1000+ posts) Sat May-07-05 04:30 PM
Original message
Our Evidence vs. Their Evidence

Edited on Sat May-07-05 05:22 PM by TruthIsAll
OUR EVIDENCE

We know Kerry led the pre-election state polls.
We know Kerry led the pre-election national polls.

We know Kerry led the post-election state exit polls, 51-48%.
We know Kerry led the post-election national exit poll, 51-48%

We know documented voting machine “glitches” favored Bush 99% of the time.

We know the media and E-M will not release detailed raw precinct data.
We know Blackwell refused to testify before Conyers.
We know Mitofsky refused to testify before Conyers.

We know that there were over 21 million new voters.
We know Kerry won the vast majority (57-62%) of new voters.

We know there were 3 million former Nader voters.
We kknow Kerry won Nader voters by 71%-21% over Bush.

We know Party ID averaged 39% Dem/35% Rep/26% Independent in the prior three elections.
We know Party ID was 38/35/27 for the first 13047 National Exit Poll respondents.
We know it was changed to 37/37/24 for the final 613 in the 13660 Final.

We know Kerry, like Gore, won the female vote 54/46% up until the final 660 respondents.
We know it was changed to 51% in the 13660 Final.

We know Bush 2000 voters represented an IMPOSSIBLE 43% of the 2004 electorate in the final 13660 Exit poll.
We know it was changed from 41% in the first 13047
We know that Bush had 50.456 mm votes in 2000.
We know that about 3.5% of them have since died.
We know, therefore, that the Bush percentage could not have been higher than 39.8% (48.69/122.26).
We know that with the 39.8/40.2% weighting, Kerry won by 52.4-46.7%, or SEVEN million votes.


We know the 2000 election was stolen - by Bush in Florida where 175,000 punch cards (70% of them Gore votes) were spoiled.
We know SCOTUS stopped the recount and voted 5-4 for Bush.

We know the 2002 election was stolen (ask Max Cleland).

We know that the National Exit Poll MoE is under 1%.
We know because we checked the NEP margin of error table.
We know because we did the simple MoE calculation.
We know that Kerry won the Natioanl Poll by over 3%, 51-48%.
We know the odds are astronomical that the deviation was triple the MoE.

We know that 42 of 50 states deviated from the exit polls to Bush. We know that includes ALL 22 states in the Eastern Time Zone.

We know that 16 states deviated beyond the exit poll MoE for Bush, and none did for Kerry.

We know that touch screen voting machines became widely used in 2004.

We know that Republicans fought against paper ballots for Diebold and ESS touch screens.

We know that ALL Diebold ATMs provide a paper receipt.

We know that the deviation trend from the exit polls to the vote was approaching ZERO until 2000, when there was a dramatic reversal.

We know that scores of newspapers which supported Bush in 2000 supported Kerry in 2004.

We know that Kerry won the Ohio Exit Poll, by at least 51-48%.

We know the media will not report in any of the above.


THEIR EVIDENCE:
Something we don't know.
The rBr hypothesis: Bush voters were reluctant to speak to exit pollsters.

But..
We know that many Republican voters deserted Bush for Kerry.
We know there were hardly any Gore Democrats who voted for Bush.

Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury:
Have you reached a verdict?

TruthIsAll (1000+ posts) Wed May-11-05 12:06 PM
Original message

TIA constraint: 2004 Votes = G+B+N+New, or New = 122.26-49.21-48.69-3.21



Total 2004 votes = Returning 2000 voters + New Voters

Total 2004 votes = Gore + Bush + Nader + New voters

New = 122.26-49.21-48.69-3.21

New = 21.15 (minimum)

Kerry won 57-60% of New voters.

Total Kerry vote = K = .9*Gore + .1*Bush + .7*Nader + .57*New
Total Bush vote = B = .1*Gore + .9*Bush + .2*Nader + .41*New

You do the math..
If you still think the 2004 election was legitimate, then here are some other things you must also believe if you really believe that George W. Bush won the election:

1. That the exit polls were WRONG.
2. That Zogby’s 5pm election day calls for Kerry winning OH and FL were WRONG. He was exactly RIGHT in his 2000 final poll.
3. That Harris’ last minute polling for Kerry was WRONG. He was exactly RIGHT in his 2000 final poll.
4. That the Incumbent Rule (that undecideds break for the challenger) was WRONG.
5. That the 50% Rule was WRONG (that an incumbent doesn’t do better than his final polling)
6. That the Approval Rating Rule was WRONG (that an incumbent with less than 50% approval will most likely lose the election)
7. That Greg Palast was WRONG when he said that even before the election, 1 million votes were stolen from Kerry. He was the ONLY reporter to break the fact that 90,000 Florida blacks were disenfranchised in 2000.
8. That it was just a COINCIDENCE that the exit polls were CORRECT where there WAS a PAPER TRAIL and INCORRECT (+5% for Bush) where there was NO PAPER TRAIL.
9. That the surge in new young voters had NO positive effect for Kerry.
10. That Bush BEAT 99-1 mathematical odds in winning the election.
11. That Kerry did WORSE than Gore against an opponent who LOST the support of SCORES of Republican newspapers who were for Bush in 2000.
12. That Bush did better than an 18 national poll average which showed him tied with Kerry at 47. In other words, Bush got 80% of the undecided vote to end up with a 51-48 majority - when ALL professional pollsters agree that the undecided vote ALWAYS goes to the challenger.
13. That voting machines made by Republicans with no paper trail and with no software publication, which have been proven by thousands of computer scientists to be vulnerable in scores of ways, were NOT tampered with in this election.
14. That people who voted for Bush were not anxious to speak to exit pollsters in the states that Bush had to win (like Florida and Ohio) where the exit polls were off, but wanted to be polled in states that he had sewn up (like Arizona, Louisiana and Arkansas) where the exit polls were exactly correct.
15. That Democrats who voted for Kerry were very anxious to be exit-polled, especially in Florida and Ohio (and that this is what accounts for the discrepancy between the exit polls and the actual votes in these two critical states).
16. That women were much more likely to be polled early in the day in Florida and Ohio. That is another reason why the exit polls were wrong in those states. In those states in which the exit polls were correct to within one percent, women did not come out early.
17. That network newscasters who claim that those who consider the possibility of fraud are just wild conspiracy theorists do not have an agenda.
18. That it is just a coincidence that only since the 2000 presidential election have exit polls failed to agree with the actual vote - and that Bush won both disputed elections.
19. That exit polls are not to be trusted in the United States, even though they are used throughout the world to monitor elections for fraud.
20. That even though more votes were cast than there were eligible voters in many precincts of critical states, it is not an issue that needs to be covered in the media.
21. That the absence of a paper ballot trail for touch screen computers does not encourage fraud, even though they have been proven by hundreds of computer experts to be highly vulnerable to fraudulent attack.
22. That statistical tests which indicate a high probability of fraud are just conspiratorial junk science.
23. That Bush’s vote tallies could exceed his exit poll percentage in FL by 4%. Based on 2846 individuals exit polled, the polling margin of error was 1.84%. The odds of this occurrence: 1 out of 1667.
24. That his vote tallies could exceed his exit poll percentage in OH by 3%. Based on 1963 individuals exit polled, the polling margin of error was 2.21%. The odds of this occurrence: 1 out of 333.
25. That his vote tallies could exceed his exit poll percentages in 41 out of 51 states. The odds of this occurrence: 1 out of 135,000.
26. That his vote tallies could exceed the margin of error in 16 states. Not one state vote tally exceeded the MOE for Kerry. The odds of this occurrence: 1 out of 13.5 Trillion.
27. That his vote tallies could exceed a 2% exit poll margin of error in 23 states. The probability of this occurrence: as close to ZERO as you can get.
28. That of 88 documented touch screen incidents, 86 voters would see their vote for Kerry come up Bush - and only TWO from Bush to Kerry. The probability of this occurrence: as close to ZERO as you can get.
29. That Mitofsky (who ran the exit polls), with 25 years of experience, has lost his exit polling touch.
30. That by disputing the Ukrainian elections, the Bush administration would base its case on the accuracy of U.S. sponsored exit polling, while at the same time ignoring exit polls in the U.S. presidential election, which the media reported Kerry was winning handily.
31. That Bush could overcome Kerry’s 50.8% - 48.2% lead in the National Exit Poll Sub-sample (13,047 polled) and win the popular vote: 51.2% - 48.4%, a 3.0% increase from the exit poll to the vote tally, far beyond the 0.86% margin of error. The odds of this occurrence: 1 out of 282 Billion.
32. According to a London-based insurance actuary, the odds of all of these things happening in ONE election, let alone two elections in a row, are too astronomical to be calculated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Excellent post! Thank you very much! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. you bet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. if you need more "proof" let me know
this only scratches the surface
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. kick for the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
42. Bookmarked. Thank you for pulling that together n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
46. Wow - just wow. What an excellent post and you've given me all
the information I have been meaning to look for. Thanks for this; I will keep it for future reference and use it when a question about our voting problems comes up. This is priceless reference material. You da man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. one more thing... it's not "comforting" at all knowing the game is rigged
I'd be far more "comforted" thinking the media did a fantastic snow job on the USA and that the shrubbery was legitimately elected, because that would mean we'd have a fucking excellent chance of getting rid of the republican majority in 2006 and impeaching these criminals, but that simply isn't the case so no, I am not comforted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. You just keep believing that if it makes you happy....
...but IMHO, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:24 PM
Original message
agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. no proof whatsoever?
How about counties where more votes went to Bush than the number of voters registered?

If that isn't a sign something was effed up, nothing is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Are you referring to the electronic voting machines? That's what.....
..."won" the 2000 and 2004 elections for the NeoCons...it's all smoke and mirrors.

If you believe the actual voters had anything to do with Herr Busch "winning" in 2000 and 2004, I think you're sadly mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah
I felt like this since the last election til late December. I don't feel that way anymore. Based on feelings I got from 3 UFO sightings (yeah, I know, but hey, if it helps me relax why not?), evrything will be OK. Til later, keep DSM on top and cooking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. During the campaign, they raised the alert level..
but that's been debunked.

You're right though, something's up. No Michael Jackson, no runaway bride crap, no Schiavo, no distractions.

Here are some possibilities:
Poppy will croak.
Cheney will have another heart attack.
China will fire on Taiwan.
Little Georgie will pull out of Iraq like he did out of Afghanistan and invade Iran.
Rehnquist will retire (I think that's a given).
Tom and Katie will elope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
30. Catshrink,
great post, but you wanna know what the saddest thing is? If everything that you wrote happened all on the same day, do you know what would be the first story on the news at the top of each hour? That's right-Tom and Katie's marriage. How sad is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. That, my friend, is one hell of a vignette! Welcome to DU
...
yikes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. Welcome to DU and good luck! You're going to need it!
Your whole saga and our government makes me sick! Get this information to the families of the 1700+. I think they should have a right to sue our pathetic government that doesn't support the troops...only themselves, their buddies and contributors. Obviously they don't support the troops!

I hope you will continue posting here and keep us informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. Disgusting. Completely. Disgusting. The people responsible for....
...this ought to be turned over to the families of the troops that have been killed and injured because of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
43. Good Christ. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I almost get the sense...
I wouldn't be surprised if this regime were abruptly taken down from within by some agency with more power than you know, that you'd least expect.

I'm not saying this is going to happen necessarily. I just have a weird feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Think about this for a second, because I think it's happened at least....
...one time before.

About a year before Nixon resigned, 2-star General Al Haig was named White House Chief-of-Staff in the first week of November 1973, and the "football" (the nuclear codes carried in a locked briefcase by a nilitary aide to the president) was assigned to someone else.

Keep in mind that Ford was not selected as Nixon's VP until the first week of December 1973. Nixon resigned from office in August 1974. Ford immediately took over as our first unelected president. His first step was to pardon Nixon, and one of his next few steps was to appoint Al Haig as the 4-star General in charge of NATO.

Just prior the the chain of events described above, Nixon had been involved in a closed-door meeting where he looked visibly ill, angry, and out-of-control. During this meeting, China was brought up as a discussion topic, to which Nixon responded that he could nuke China back to the Stone Ages with the push of a finger.

My belief is that the Joint Chiefs of Staff took control of the country in a very quiet behind the scenes coup. Haig was appointed as White House Chief-of-Staff to control all actions coming from the White House. A friend of mine was stationed on Guam at one of our listening posts in 1973, and when Haig took over in the White House, an order was sent out from the Joint Chiefs of Staff that "ALL orders from the Commander-in-Chief are to be disregarded". Think about what that order actually meant.

And in exchange for Al Haig's service in the White House he was awarded the then-prestigious position as head of NATO.

Has a military coup happened before 1973? Take a look at the events surrounding the assassination of JFK in 1963. Who benefitted? How come the autopsists mentioned that there were several high-ranking officers present when JFK was being given his autopsy? Who ordered the Army presidential security detail to stand down on the day of November 22, 1963?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yankee Blue Veteran Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. A 'dirty' micronuke! What do you think?
After killing 3,000 and then terrorizing our entire nation with visions of the caveman camel cavalry galloping over the horizon to annihiliate each and every one of us, the only real problem for these bastards is choosing the location of the NEXT 'caveman' attack.

Just in case everyone has forgotten: The same sources that brought us WMDs and Saddam's nukes are the same sources that brought us the following:

BEWARE! THE CAVEMAN COMETH!

EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT! CAVEMAN COMBAT KILLS!

A caveman from the other side of the world penetrated the greatest strategic military and intelligence defenses the world has ever known and slaughtered more than 3,000 people on our own soil with only 20 recruits!

WOW!

Let me repeat that again, a little more slowly this time: A caveman. . .from the other side of the world. . .penetrated. . .the greatest strategic military and intelligence defenses the world has ever known. . .and slaughtered more than 3,000 people. . .on our own soil. . .with only 20 recruits!

If that’s true, then we’re all in big trouble, people, and in order to survive, we must get rid of present failed leadership, eliminate the lies and liars—the traitors—among us and help our patriots kill the caveman, and elect wise and brave and truthful patriots to lead us.

If that’s not true, then we’re all in BIG trouble, people, and in order to survive, we must get rid of present failed leadership, expose and kill the leadership that killed our 3,000 people and eliminate the lies and liars—the traitors—among us, and elect wise and brave and truthful patriots to lead us.

If a caveman from the other side of the world penetrated the greatest strategic military and intelligence defenses the world has ever known and slaughtered more than 3,000 people on our own soil with only 20 recruits, imagine what a modern foreign military force of 2 million recruits would do: With present failed leadership, a modern foreign military force of 2 million recruits would wipe out our entire American population of 300 million!

A once revered and honored war leader assured us long ago, “We have nothing to fear but fear itself,” so present failed leadership prioritized, categorized and colorized all our fears for us – but how do we know who and what to fear the most first? Should it be:

A caveman from the other side of the world who penetrated the greatest strategic military and intelligence defenses the world has ever known and slaughtered more than 3,000 people on our own soil with only 20 recruits?—OR the modern foreign military force of 2 million recruits that would wipe out our entire American population of 300 million?—OR present failed leadership that says a caveman from the other side of the world penetrated the greatest strategic military and intelligence defenses the world has ever known and slaughtered more than 3,000 people on our own soil with only 20 recruits.

Wake up and wise up, people!
Stop believing lies and liars!
Stop fearing those who fear us!
Stop honoring cowards who dishonor us!
Stop defending leaders who fail to defend us!
Stop excusing failures of present failed leadership!
Stop enabling hypocrites who worship only mammon!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. I've had a bad feeling ever since I heard that chimpy was running for
Pres in 2000! I can't shake it! :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. LOL
Good one! :) heheheh I KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. Right?
Seriously though, I knew he was bad news, since I had to put with him as my Gov.!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. I personally think the neocons are finished...
Yep, I think this is the beginning of the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Not hardly. They will do ANYTHING to keep power. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I keep thinking of "The Handmaid's Tale"
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 10:26 PM by Catshrink
by Margaret Atwood. I'm thinking if the fristians get scared enough that they will lose power, they will toss away the constitution all together and in some way this "Gilead" will come to pass.

Here's a bit of the synopsis from sparknotes.com:

The architects of Gilead began their rise to power in an age of readily available pornography, prostitution, and violence against women—when pollution and chemical spills led to declining fertility rates. using the military, they assassinated the president and members of Congress and launched a coup, claiming that they were taking power temporarily. They cracked down on women’s rights, forbidding women to hold property or jobs.

on edit: here is the sparknotes link:

http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/handmaid/summary.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. And knowing that is why we all have a bad feeling
In a democracy, power changes hands peacefully and at the will of the people. We know that is no longer an option. These guys subverted the rule of law to maintain power cuz if they loose control they all go down and they are not the type of vermin that falls on swords.

They are most dangerous when they are most threatened. And they are plenty threatened right now.

MIHOP is just all in a day's work for these criminals. They have no loyalities save to their $$ and they have no humanity. 3000 here, 100,000 there it matters not to them. We the People are just a means to an end for them. Know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. hate to sound ignorant
but what is MIHOP? Many International Houses Of Pancakes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Made It Happen On Purpose = MIHOP.....
.......Let It Happen On Purpose = LIHOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Something is up
To me, Rove statements today are a sign that something coming down the pike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. Yes. Bad... Very, very bad
Those cold blooded reptiles are feeling more cornered and desperate everyday...

No conscience, no limbic brain, no boundaries...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. any idea what's next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. They're getting very desperate....I'm thinking that they will try...
...another "terrorist attack", possibly in a major city, and possibly using some form of WMD.

I just hope people at all levels see through it this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. What Media_Lies_Daily said in post #37
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 12:08 AM by Tinoire
Something that will allow them to take away even more of our "freedoms" with increasing internment. A friend of mine whose very astute told me the same today; it was depressing to hear someone else say what you're thinking- someone else who's called almost every step they've taken in the last 5 years and foresaw the war exactly as it unfolded. He noticed that O'Reilly, Limbaugh and their ilk are openly making calls to start interning ACLU-types. Read the link in my sig line about internment camps. When the head of the "US Institute of Peace" openly says such things and the chorus starts repeating him, you know we're in serious trouble.

I think the opening is ripe for them to aid, abet and exploit a pandemic disease... something more subtle than the last time, easier to "camouflage", and where they'll get the willing help of enough Americans to carry about their business.

Nasty, frightening times...

I agree with your post #1 though because we reinforce each others fears at DU. Better to stay on track fighting them and cornering them more and more everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. Here's MY prediction: Artificially created earthquakes!
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 11:16 PM by gauguin57
Secret government underground nuclear tests on both the San Andreas and New Madrid Faults. There have already been enough smaller temblors on BOTH faults to make people think something NATURAL is afoot (I just read today that there have been dozens of earthquakes recently in the area of the New Madrid (mid-country) fault (one with potential to be worse than the Big One in Calif. ... in the early 1800s, three New Madrid earthquakes destroyed towns and could be felt over 2 million square miles!!!)

Anyway ... so the BFEE & Henchmen artificially get big quakes going at those two sites -- big chunks of the country are in rubble -- and Bush declares marshal law (and declares himself King of America for life).

Oh, and P.S.... Ah-nuld gets to stand on the rubble of the coastal area of Cal-ee-fohr-nee-ya and act like a big LEADER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
41. Proof we're all shell-shocked. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Just because you see an enemy behind every Bush,
it does not follow that you are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
45. They have dropped all pretense now
They are all publicly freaking out now. Anything is possible. Anything. If Rove suddenly went on a shooting spree, that would not surprise me at all.

I don't mind admitting that I am truly frightened. and angry. oh yes, very angry. The things I want to say about Rove...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
47. Yep
the sheep are waking,

Tribunals forming

The insurgency has the indencency to keep at it

Teh economy is in ruins

Poll numbers keep droping

Nope we are not paranoid

Will it work this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC