yet another major Bush administration scandal designed to give short-term rewards to corporate cronies at the expense of the public. In the longer term, these policies will cripple the beef industry as the number of publicly known positive results rises despite the far-from-complete testing and lying about results.
Remember that the first US cow that tested positive was NOT a downer cow, despite what turned out to be lies in the vet's report. So a policy that targets testing to downer cows does NOT protect from the disease. Further, there is almost no enforcement of new beef processing rules designed to prevent BSE from contaminating meat used for food, and slaughtering procedures are largely unchanged as a result.
No links except for the last article cited in this group of four, but the dates and venues are there. The one with the link gave me a "sorry, story is not available" message just now when I clicked on the link.
Let me know if you want more - I have a lot more articles. They do not inspire confidence in the honesty or integrity of the big beef industry, the USDA, or the country's beef supply. (And remember that rendered beef byproducts turn up EVERYWHERE.)
Yahoo! News Fri, Mar 26, 2004
Beef firm faces perplexing resistance to mad cow tests
Fri Mar 26, 6:30 AM ET
Op/Ed - USATODAY.com
Creekstone Farms Premium Beef is a small producer of high-quality beef in Kansas. But it's making a big point about mad cow disease. It wants to privately test all of the cattle it slaughters for the illness, which can cause a fatal brain disease in humans who eat infected meat. The way Creekstone Farms sees it, 100% testing would reassure U.S customers. The company also says it is talking with Japan about restarting exports there, where total testing is required.
(snip)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (news - web sites) (USDA) currently does not allow such private testing for mad cow disease. And it claims that a new government testing system it approved this month is perfectly adequate. More than 10 times the number of cattle will be tested for mad cow under the new system, but the government still will be testing less than 1% of the 37 million cattle slaughtered in the U.S. each year. That falls far short of the 100% testing Creekstone Farms is proposing and Japan provides.
Other beef producers complain that Creekstone Farms' 100% testing plans would set an expensive precedent. They worry that consumers might be misled into thinking an untested cut of beef isn't safe. But food producers ranging from organic growers to free-range farmers already market their products based on the idea that food produced in healthier ways or with added safeguards is worth paying for. Creekstone Farms' proposal taps into the same logic.
Other beef producers and the USDA say going beyond the new system is unnecessary. But hundreds of seemingly healthy cattle in Europe have tested positive for mad cow disease.
(snip)
This one is from the NY Times:
April 10, 2004
U.S. Won't Let Company Test All Its Cattle for Mad Cow
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.
The Department of Agriculture refused yesterday to allow a Kansas beef producer to test all of its cattle for mad cow disease, saying such sweeping tests were not scientifically warranted.
The producer, Creekstone Farms Premium Beef, wanted to use recently approved rapid tests so it could resume selling its fat-marbled black Angus beef to Japan, which banned American beef after a cow slaughtered in Washington State last December tested positive for mad cow. The company has complained that the ban is costing it $40,000 a day and forced it to lay off 50 employees.
The department's under secretary for marketing and regulation, Bill Hawks, said in a statement yesterday that the rapid tests, which are used in Japan and Europe, were licensed for surveillance of animal health, while Creekstone's use would have "implied a consumer safety aspect that is not scientifically warranted."
(snip)
The department recently changed its testing regimen to make a one-time effort, beginning in June, to test 201,000 cows with symptoms of nervous disease or that are too sick or injured to walk, and 20,000 healthy older ones. The regimen assumes that cattle born before 1997, when a ban was imposed on feeding bovine tissue to cattle, are most at risk.
(snip)
Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
From MSNBC:
More evidence mad cow not a 'downer'
Owner of slaughterhouse says USDA misled public about risks
By Jon Bonné
MSNBC
Updated: 5:05 p.m. ET Feb. 19, 2004
The owner of the slaughterhouse that killed the first U.S. cow found with mad cow disease has come forward to confirm that the cow was able to walk at the time it was killed.
Tom Ellestad, who with his family runs Vern's Moses Lake Meats, where the sick cow was slaughtered, says the cow could walk at the time it was killed and disputed the portrayal of his plant as one that mostly handled sick and injured cattle.
His claim further throws into doubt the insistence of the U.S. Department of Agriculture that the cow was a ‘downer’, which required that it be tested for mad cow disease, as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, a fatal brain disease, is commonly known.
Ellestad also accused the USDA of falling short of its responsibility to keep the public safe both before the Dec. 23 announcement that mad cow disease had arrived in the United States and after its Dec. 30 decision to ban downed cattle from the food supply, which it claimed would be a major step in ensuring consumers' health.
(snip - a long article)
This one is from Reuters, and I did save the link - but when I checked it just now, I got a message saying that the story is not available:
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=7143913US Meat Plants Violating Mad Cow Rules-Inspectors
Mon Dec 20, 2004 05:02 PM ET
By Randy Fabi
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. meat plants are allowing brains and spinal cord from older cattle to enter the food supply, violating strict government regulations aimed at preventing the spread of mad cow disease, a federal meat inspectors union said on Monday.
Nearly a year after the first U.S. case of mad cow disease, meat plants have yet to implement measures required by the U.S. Agriculture Department to protect consumers, said the National Joint Council of Food Inspection Locals.
(snip)
"We know USDA's zero tolerance is not being met," Painter said. "We believe this is a widespread problem." He declined to say how many plants were in violation.
The USDA disagreed with the union, saying no prohibited cattle parts were slipping into the food supply.
(snip)
I don't eat US beef except for an very occasional cut purchased from a trusted natural foods market, where I know it was raised from birth on an all-vegetarian diet and slaughtered and processed safely. (And also had a not-too-bad life in a field.) I eat more fish than land-based meats, and I am trending toward total vegetarianism. I have found that well-prepared vegetarian food from around the world is delicious, healthful and satisfying, and no animals suffered and died for it. I've enjoyed my Indian vegetarian cooking class enormously and love stocking up in "ethnic" markets in the greater Boston area.