Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hardline anti-West candidate in STUNNING Iran presidential win

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:33 PM
Original message
Hardline anti-West candidate in STUNNING Iran presidential win
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 06:33 PM by Bluebear
Hmmm, the "religious poor" won it for him. Sounds familiar.

===



TEHRAN (Reuters) - Hardline Tehran mayor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad swept toward a stunning presidential election victory over veteran cleric Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani on Saturday with the backing of Iran's religious poor, officials said.

Political analysts say a win for Ahmadinejad, 48, could spell an end to fragile social reforms made under outgoing President
Mohammad Khatami and harden Iran's foreign policy toward the West, particularly over its nuclear program.

An official at the Islamic Republic's Guardian Council, which must approve the election results, said that with 13.3 million votes counted, Ahmadinejad had secured 61.6 percent...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050624/ts_nm/iran_election_dc_105;_ylt=AuBIthD8liHY_NMVSLPKN_JSw60A;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let the riots and revolution begin. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Like hell!
They elected this hard line sack of crap precisely because Bush has them terrified that they're next on the invasion list, and they most likely are next.

This is just another example of how a stressed population will always rally around the WORST leaders in time of crisis. All you have to do is scare them sufficiently, and they'll look for the biggest bullies to put into power.

Remember this every time Bush tries to push another country around. He's getting hardliners into power and getting the US isolated.

We will NOT be on the winning side in the next big war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. As the Iranian said the other day "Thank You George Bush" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Indeed. Bigmouth really helped them out didn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Shudder....
:scared:

"harden Iran's foreign policy toward the West, particularly over its nuclear program."

That's just fantastic. I'm so glad we have such adept diplomats in power right now. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, the Bush Doctrine of preemptively killing Muslims
is paying dividends all over the globe! Iraq is turning into Somalia. And now Iran elects a conservative opposed to democratizing reforms.
Freedumb is certainly on the march.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, but now Bush can have his war this summer......
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 06:48 PM by Gloria
I'm afraid that Bushco will now regain their "mission" and poll ratings as they go toe to toe with Iran....

SHIT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. IRAN’S NUCLEAR DIPLOMACY SEEN AT STAKE IN RUN-OFF
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 06:47 PM by Gloria
Analysis posted last night to the current World Media Watch....

Read the rest of the article...this guy is the Howard Dean of Iran....he minces no words with regard to the US and nukes....



1//IranMania, UK Thursday, June 23, 2005

http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?ArchiveNews=Yes&NewsCode=32836&NewsKind=CurrentAffairs



IRAN’S NUCLEAR DIPLOMACY SEEN AT STAKE IN RUN-OFF



LONDON, June 23 (IranMania) - A victory in Iran's presidential run-off by hardliner Mahmood Ahmadinejad would remove a moderating influence from within the regime and could put the Islamic republic on a collision course with the West, diplomats and analysts said.



Seen as being most at stake is Iran's relatively pragmatic approach in diplomacy over its nuclear programme, which Iran maintains is for peaceful purposes but is seen by many as the cover for weapons development.



SNIP



"It is extremely important to understand that what is at stake is this process concerning dangerous nuclear materials," French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy cautioned after Ahmadinejad was thrust into a shock run-off against Rafsanjani.



SNIP



But a loss by the regime veteran could see both him and Iran's nuclear negotiators, including Rafsanjani loyalists such as Hassan Rowhani, squeezed out amid a wider political shift to the right.



According to Ahmadinejad, currently Tehran's mayor, "those who are handling the talks are terrified, and before they even sit down at the negotiating table they retreat 500 kilometres."

"A popular and fundamentalist government," he added, "will quickly change that."



An Ahmadinejad win would also place every Iranian elected and non-elected institution under the control of Iran's anti-Western religious right, ending what has up to now been a delicate equilibrium in decision making between moderates and hardliners.

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Those durn "unexpected consequences" again.
Just like the missing flowers from the missing jubilant crowds and the missing love of Amurka in Iraq.

Don't want them troops out of there. No siree, we gotta "stay the course", "complete the mission", "send a message", and all that "decisiveness" that worked so well in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. is that photo from the Iran elections?
are they mocking the "purple fingers" hype?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. US outmaneuvered by the
arrogance of the Bush team. As, for example, the presumption they could buy and bully the newly religious leaning government of Turkey to take a lot of flak in the Iraq war it backfired. Reason would have it that the judicious backing of dissident parties would create a Ukraine style muck, but one that would split wide the fruit for armed intervention.

Their arrogance is so total that in pursuit of this careful goal they did not care about consequences. In the end they expect American might to triumph and just harrumph that these "poor fools" want to resist instead of joining the new American gravy train.

So inwardly despicable are the American war criminals that they simply cannot stand any form of patriotism or integrity among their natural victims, i.e. anyone weaker or poorer than the White American Hegemony.(WAH for short). Did anyone lose their job was any war stopped by their personal failures(embassies of Cheney trolls to Turkey, Powell to UN)? Did the French ever jump on board despite a long history of their own arrogance and diplomatic smarts? Sneering fools in the RW expected the weaklings to submit to the Great American Scream(GAS for short).

Now a whole operation of subverting an election to "build democracy" lies in just ruins not because it was doomed but because in lazy arrogance it was haughtily misplayed. Rice is guilty as any buffoon of talking down to people who have a great deal of power to make life miserable for the US.

But hey, it's only American infantry dying for these faux pas. The show goes on. Bushco shrugs at the cost of incompetence at the impertinence of their victims. So far. After all, what neocon except possibly the journalist Michael Kelly has died on the field for the PNAC dream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC