|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 08:55 PM Original message |
Shocking New Developments In Supreme Court vs. Homeowners Case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. DAYUM - Now that's some family valuez! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evlbstrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
2. This is thuggery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. and the word would be "word" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evlbstrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakey (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 08:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
40. "Imminent" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evlbstrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theearthisround (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Thanks! Happy to be here! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. Really, you ought to take that with a grain of salt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I do not understand why the liberal justices voted for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Because they really aren't activist judges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. There ARE no 'liberals' on the Supreme Court. Just a few that are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Cristofaro said he has his current home for sale at $150,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Not inconsistent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. I heard this interview live via shortwave.....even Alex Jones was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mom cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
10. Absolutely outrageous! Bet this scheme was cooked up by the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. Welcome to Bush's America. If this is what liberal SC judges can do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 10:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. If this is what liberal Supremes do, then what's the difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
susanna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 11:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. The more I understand of it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. SOLUTION = vote in new local and state reps who will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 10:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
27. The rich can grease enough of the officials to get their way (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. BTW we are fighting a similar event in our neighborhood - > |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 01:47 AM Response to Reply #15 |
38. You will have a harder time, even without this hideous ruling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gyre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
16. That's nauseating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
17. Great, "We the People" can use that precedent to offer $60 billion for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. Welcome to the NeoCon Reich. Thanks, SCOTUS...you should be so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberallyInclined (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. ummm...you might want to check how the vote on the decision came down- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Silence (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 11:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
34. I don't think you can blame this on the neocons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleonora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 01:29 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. yeah yeah...right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 10:07 AM Response to Reply #34 |
42. Hi Radio_Silence!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. Holy Cow...heavy article...thanks for posting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
23. I can't come up with a better definition of public use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 10:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Public use is when the public owns the land and the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
24. I would not go peacefully. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nothing Without Hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
28. Horrible. I wonder if this will be painted as a "it's the liberal judges' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleonora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 01:24 AM Response to Reply #28 |
36. many repubs are already blaming it on the 'liberals' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robert Oak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
29. dolan's unscripted on CNN tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrowowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
31. Imminent domain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dee625 (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
32. My in-laws narrowly escaped losing their home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
siliconefreak (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
33. NOW / PBS story about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libodem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
35. So am I to understand this was a 'liberal' decision? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJCher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 08:04 AM Response to Original message |
39. see this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moderator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
41. theearthisround |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
43. Now this is worth some ammo and some American lives! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yorkiemommie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-25-05 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
44. i know my local mayor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genieroze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
45. SCOTUS = DIRTBAGS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC