Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can anyone explain "neo-lib" to me?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:32 PM
Original message
Can anyone explain "neo-lib" to me?
I've seen a couple people throwing this term around but haven't picked up on what is meant by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting
Is a neo-lib the exact opposite of a neo-con? I have no idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. neolib and neocon are almost interchangeable.
Remove the longing to use the military to spread the American empire and you have a neolib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They are not interchangeable if you agree with other posters on this
thread who identify actual Dems like Bill Clinton as neolibs.

Just the very fact of voting for Dems and/or NOT voting for Repubs would be a rather important distinction.

Does anyone have any good links or articles about this? I see a lot of misuse of the term "neocon" on this site and there are fairly well established origins and definitions of that term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Agreed
Neoliberals and Neoconservatives share the exact same goals and trade off on who's holding the reins as they work together to achieve their aims.

Neoliberals prefer to use trade tariffs, World Bank loans, IMF reforms, sanctions, and such "economic coercions" and when those don't work, enter the neoconservatives who make no effort to disguise their intentions and send in the military.

Just two different mafia methods.

Most of the neocons everyone so reviles today started off as Democrats. Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz, to this day, are still registered Democrats. That right there should tell you something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. They believe that military force should be used to protect corporate
Edited on Sun Jun-26-05 02:44 PM by brainshrub
interests.

Think of a former hippie who became a successful and wealthy commodities broker. He isn't evil enough to register Republican, but he doesn't want to support policies that would endanger his wealth.

That is a Neo-Liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Just like Oprah...
I like her....BUT! And it's a big BUT because she has SO much power and SO much influence and won't do a damn thing to fight these bastards! Her show is based on compassion and caring but I don't see her doing anything except that piss poor voting show where she was totally and 100% non committal when she could have made a huge difference in opening peoples mind about * & Co. :eyes:

Oprah plays it safe all right. She's protecting her interests and money no doubt about it. And she's lost a LOT of my respect because of it. Because what could be more compassionate than saving people from *s war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can anyone on this thread give an example of a well known person who
is a "neolib"? I can give you plenty of "neo-cons" but I can't name anyone who is a consensus "neolib".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bill Clinton, prime example.
Tony Blair

Hillary Clinton

Joe Lieberman

actually about 80% or more of the Democrats in Congress.

The best litmus test is, are they pro-NAFTA?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Reagan?
Picture the NAFTA lovers. Clinton could definitely be termed neoliberal to an extent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. To me, this term has no meaning if people are lumping Reagan, Clinton
together under it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Clinton, to me, isn't a true neoliberal. Only his support of like NAFTA
would put him close to that category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I'd say there was more...
Edited on Sun Jun-26-05 06:42 PM by Lone_Wolf
Michael Moore said about Clinton and it's 100% true.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Michael_Moore/Democrats_DOA_SWM.html

"He has signed a bill providing for federal funds to be distributed to "faith-based" charitable organizations.

He has expanded the number of federal crimes for which the death penalty can be given to a total of sixty.

He has signed a bill outlawing gay marriages and has taken out ads on Christian radio stations touting his opposition to any form of legal same-sex couplings.

In a short span of time, he has been able to kick ten million people off welfare-that's ten million out of fourteen million total recipients."

There's a lot more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Liberalism Means "Unregulated". Everywhere But Here, Neo-Liberal Refers
Unregulated Industry or Free Market Capitalism.

Of course, with the 'unregulated' bit being an illusion. The Economy to a Neo-Liberal SHOULD be regulated... just to the advantage of Industry.

Far as I know, only in the US does Liberalism refer to unregulated Society...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Essentially means pro-corporate and socially liberal...
Use this as a rule of thumb...

Many have bought into the Free-Market myth. There are varying degrees. of neolibs depending on how much they favor corporate rights to individual rights. They are more willing to work with other countries than the neocons.

On a political spectrum, I would put them slightly to the left of the moderate Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. So far the definitions seem too broad to me. You can point to Wolfowitz
and I can say "he's a neoconservative". What's Kerry? Clinton? Howard Dean? Reagan? ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Wolfowitz is a neocon
Wolfowitz wouldn't fit my criteria of neolib... Wolfowitz certainly doesn't like the idea of working with other nations. He essentially wrote the PNAC doctrine on US dominance.

Kerry and Clinton would both be neolibs, but I would say Kerry is the more hawkish of the two.

Howard Dean is tough to quantitiate. On economic issues he's moderate and on social issues he tends to be liberal to moderate.

Reagan political leanings were irrelevant because he was a tool to those really in charge (the policy makers in his administration). He was just a huckster salesman who could get the American people to buy the neocon's product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. From Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-liberal
"The term neoliberalism was coined by Conservative Republicans to describe a political-economic philosophy that had major implications for government policies beginning in the 1970s – and increasingly prominent since 1980 – that de-emphasizes or rejects government intervention in the economy (that complements private initiative), focusing instead on achieving progress and even social justice by encouraging free-market methods and fewer restrictions on business operations and economic development. Supporters argue that by implementing business-friendly policies, a society can assure that its businesses grow, creating jobs and other economic benefits which improve the welfare of the entire economy. This is commonly referred to as 'trickle down economics' or 'Reaganomics.' Detractors tend to think that government intervention is necessary to create an equitable society.

It can be contrasted with economic nationalism, fair trade and anti-capitalism, three different alternatives to neoliberalism."

Much more on the link.

Interesting thing, near the top of the page is a warning that the "neutrality" of the article is disputed, with a link to a discussion page.

Is this a new Freeper tactic?

OK, I'm going in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Wow! No, It's not a Freeper tactic. It was an amazing discussion!
I highly recommend reading it. Most seemed to agree that neo-liberalism is an economic philosophy. Basically, a Free Market philosophy. Although some claimed that, in essence, it was no different that neo-conservativism, some pointed out that neo-conservatism also included a "hawkish" foreign policy wheras a neo-liberal could be either hawkish or doveish, and either socially conservative or liberal. Clinton was cited as a neo-liberal who was also socially liberal.

Here are some examples given:
"Neoliberalism has many representatives especially in the centris Democratic Leadership Conference wing of the Democratic Party. Prominent neoliberals would be the Clintons, Gary Hart, and Joe Lieberman. I saw Gary Hart referred to as a neoliberal in the book Cadillac Desert, which is from the 1980s."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityZen-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. See Sen. Dianne Frankenstein
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC