Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Department of Peace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 03:03 PM
Original message
U.S. Department of Peace

I recently read a piece by Will Pitt about why we're at war. It boils down to the fact that war is our country's business--that's what we do. So I was struck by a flyer at one of the tables at a recent Defending Democracy conference, detailing the bill in Congress to establish a Cabinet level Department of Peace.

If you go to the link and click media, you'll find a copy of the flyer detailing the major points of the bill. Walter Cronkite likes it. Dennis Kucinich likes it. And I like it. Some of the additional offices that would be established within the Department of Peace would be the Offices of Domestic and of International Peace Activities, the Office of Technology for Peace, the Office of Arms Control and Disarmament, and the Office of Peaceful Coexistence and Nonviolent Conflict Resolution. The Secretary of Peace would serve as delegate to the National Security Council.

My only quibble with the bill is that the Department of Peace would merely "advise" the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. I think our Ambassador to the U.N. should be from the Department of Peace. Whoever it is would be a whole lot better than Bolton.

www.afdop.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
moof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, lets not discuss abything as positive as peace here at DU.
Kick for peace and freedom , not that there's much freedom either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. The mission sounds nice, but
a new superagency with BushCo in charge
would have the same problems as the State Dept.
which is responsible for most of this already.

The crossover of domestic and international policy
and the Orwellian sounding name set off too many
alarm bells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It would never pass with BFEE in charge--not to worry. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC