Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ten Commandments allowed on the grounds of State House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:53 AM
Original message
Ten Commandments allowed on the grounds of State House
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 09:58 AM by dogday
in Texas. Not in Courthouse but State House on the ground... Freepers are very happy! Heard on CNN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Linkage?
Purty please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. CNN right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Link here
LBN thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1585002

AP link:

http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SCOTUS_TEN_COMMANDMENTS?SITE=JRC&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2005-06-27-11-20-40

Court Splits on Ten Commandments Displays

By HOPE YEN
Associated Press Writer


WASHINGTON (AP) -- A sharply divided Supreme Court on Monday upheld the constitutionality of displaying the Ten Commandments on government land, but drew the line on displays inside courthouses, saying they violated the doctrine of separation of church and state.

Sending dual signals in closely-watched cases, the high court said displays of the Ten Commandments - like their own courtroom frieze - are not inherently unconstitutional. But each exhibit demands scrutiny to determine whether it goes too far in amounting to a governmental promotin of religion, the court said in a case involving Kentucky courthouse exhibits.

In that 5-4 ruling and another ruling, involving the positioning of a 6-foot granite monument of the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the Texas capitol, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was the swing vote. The second ruling, likewise, was 5-4.

In a stinging dissent to the ruling involving Kentucky's courthouse exhibits, Justice Antonin Scalia declared: "What distinguishes the rule of law from the dictatorship of a shifting Supreme Court majority is the absolutely indispensable requirement that judicial opinions be grounded in consistently applied principle."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks
And what the hell is so hard about this. The First Amendment clearly states how religion is to be treated. Scalia makes no sense to me, but maybe I am just dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. If the 10 Commandments can stay on the grounds
someone needs to put up a statue of Buddha right next to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Let's take a road trip...
hauling Buddha on a trailer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, I'd love to!
That would be so cool. I'll bring the beverages. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Watching it on CNN right now...
What an arrogant bastard talking now! All god talk. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. they have a problem LOL
from CNN site

Justices left legal wiggle room, saying that some displays -- like their own courtroom frieze -- would be permissible if they're portrayed neutrally in order to honor the nation's legal history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Simply put, that means they have to allow a statue of Kali
put up right next to the 10 Cs at state level, whether they like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. WOOOOOOHOOOOOOO!!!!
Kali-ma is my FAVORITE Dark Goddess!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. yes the SC took the legal argument that 10 comm. were part of our
historica legacy (the outside case).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. it is a narrow ruling (ie. nativity scenes are NOT part of legal history).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Also, these were put up in the public arena with private funds
as opposed to state sponsored framed copies of the ten commandments in a court room where participation is compulsory.

Reasonable rulings in both cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. I have no problem with the Ten Commandments being posted
if it helps Reps to rememeber that lying and murdering and coveting are wrong, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. first commandment
"Thou shalt have no other gods before me"

<sarcasm> no religious preference there </sarcasm>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. It's odd....they want the display on public
ground, but I never see the ten commandments displayed in church yards. How come?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Ministers said so
Fundies feel persecuted since people disagree with them. They want their crap on the state grounds so people can "know" Deity and make America better. Fundies are running scared. To them, Jesus is late in returning so they have to be extra fundie to have him return. If Jesus doesn't return, we'll see violence but Christianity would fade away as it's myths are exposed. Then we ca have sanity back after 2,000 years of madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC