cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 10:15 AM
Original message |
What does the SC's refusal to hear the CIA leak case mean? n/t |
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
1. That a lower court will have to cover it up. |
Mandate My Ass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
IOW, the jig is up for Judith Miller.
|
BrainRants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Means Judith MIller becomes someones bitch soon! |
|
Bye Bye Judy, maybe you can call Nofacts and see how he got off and you didn't?
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Means they got the note about 'White powder may follow' |
|
and had the common response.
|
bullimiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-27-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |
5. i didnt hear that. well it means they wont intercede in |
|
the lower court ruling of contempt in the plame case.
miller and the other can be sent directly to jail unless the judge changes his ruling.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |