Freeper's can't figure out the SCOTUS rulling on the 10 Commandments

[berni_mccoy]

One of them has, a freeper called "E Rocc". He is what I would expect from a true conservative who favors minimal government.

Check it out here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1431522/posts?q=1&&page=451

He notes that only TWO of the TEN commandments are illegal today and that, unlike most of the RW Chrishun nuts think, the TEN commandments were NOT a founding document of this country.

It's just another issue that has the true conserveratives seperated from the 'Chrishuns' and NeoCons. The repubs are falling apart more and more each day.

[acmejack]

1. Gee, I'm Sorry top hear they're falling apart!

No, I'm not...

[rateyes]

2. Technically speaking...3 of the 10 are law...

1. No murder.
2. No stealing.
3. No lying (bearing false witness)--which is only illegal if it is done under oath. Which, IMO, is why Bush agreed to testify before 9/11 commission, only if he could do it without taking the oath. Didn't want to be impeached for perjury.

[ComerPerro]

5. Yeah, the lying is kinda like a "half" law

You can lie all you want. Just not under oath.

[Shipwack]

3. My world view is skewing...

Some of those guys are actually making sense, especially with regard to founding documents of the US, and intents of the Founding Fathers to -not- establish America as "Christian state". Spelling and grammar are better than usual, too.

Then again, I don't have a problem with many true conservative principles, just the neocons perversion of them.

[Warpy]

4. It's hard for that light switch mentality

to comprehend a nuanced decision that reflected the fact that yes, there are shades of grey out there, that what would be completely inappropriate at the entrance to a court may be perfectly appropriate on a village green or in a store window, as long as alternative belief systems are also given the same access.

It drives them crazy when it isn't an all or nothing decision.