Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Toward a better Ten Commandments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:39 PM
Original message
Toward a better Ten Commandments
I was looking around to see if anyone had actually discussed the fact that most of the Ten Commandments are, in themselves, unconstitutional. This is an obvious issue that I never see discussed. The issue discussed is whether somoene should be able to put them up in a classroom. I posit that yes, we should because it proves that this country was NOT founded on biblical principles. What ths right wing is fightint for is the anti thesis of American history.

I found and interesting discussion of this on the site:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/features/2000/carrier2.html

Now, I don't have much formal book larnin' so I ain't never heared of this Solon guy, although I enjot his online magazine, but his commandments seem to have more relevance to the life of the average American.

Ten Commandments of Solon


1. Trust good character more than promises.
2. Do not speak falsely.
3. Do good things.
4. Do not be hasty in making friends, but do not abandon them once made.
5. Learn to obey before you command.
6. When giving advice, do not recommend what is most pleasing, but what is most useful.
7. Make reason your supreme commander.
8. Do not associate with people who do bad things.
9. Honor the gods.
10. Have regard for your parents.

"Unlike the Commandments of Moses, none of these is outdated or antithetical to modern moral or political thought. Every one could be taken up by anyone today, of any creed--except perhaps only one. And indeed, there is something much more profound in these commandments. They are far more useful as precepts for living one's life. Can society, can government, prevail and prosper if we fail to uphold the First Commandment of Moses? By our own written declaration of religious liberty for all, we have staked our entire national destiny on the belief that we not only can get by without it, but we ought to abolish it entirely. Yet what if we were to fail to uphold Solon's first commandment? The danger to society would be clear--indeed, doesn't this commandment speak to the heart of what makes or breaks a democratic society? Isn't it absolutely fundamental that we not trust the promises of politicians and flatterers, but elect our leaders and choose our friends instead by taking the trouble to evaluate the goodness of their character? This, then, can truly be said to be an ideal that is fundamental to modern moral and political thought.

Now, two of the commandments of Solon are almost identical to those advocated by Moses: do not speak falsely, and have regard for your parents. Of course, Solon does not restrict his first injunction to false accusations or testimony against others, as Moses does. Solon's commandment is more profound and thus more fundamental, and is properly qualified by the other commandments in just the way we believe is appropriate--for Solon's rules allow one to lie if doing so is a good deed (no such prescription to do good appears in the Ten Commandments of Moses). And whereas Moses calls us to honor our parents (in the Hebrew, from kabed, "to honor, to glorify"), Solon's choice of words is more appropriate--he only asks us to treat our parents in a respectful way (in the Greek, from aideomai, "to show a sense of regard for, to have compassion upon"), which we can do even if we disobey or oppose them, and even if we disapprove of their character and thus have no grounds to honor them.

"

....."The Ten Commandments of Moses (Deuteronomy 5:6-21, Exodus 20:3-16) run as follows--and I am even going out of my way to leave out the bounteous and blatantly-religious language that actually surrounds them in the original text, as well as the tacit approval of slavery present in the fourth commandment, none of which is even remotely suitable for political endorsement by a free republic:

1. Have no other gods before me .
2. Make no images of anything in heaven, earth or the sea, and do not worship or labor for them.
3. Do not vainly use the name of your God .
4. Do no work on the seventh day of the week.
5. Honor your parents.
6. Do not kill.
7. Do not commit adultery.
8. Do not steal.
9. Do not give false testimony against another.
10. Do not desire another's wife or anything that belongs to another.

Now, we can see at once that our society is entirely opposed to the first four, and indeed the last of these ten. As a capitalist society, we scoff at the idea of closing our shops on a choice market day. And our very goal in life is to desire--desiring is what drives us toward success and prosperity. The phrase "seeking the American Dream," which lies at the heart of our social world, has at its heart the very idea of coveting the success of our peers, goading us to match it with our own industry, and we owe all our monumental national success to this. Finally, our ideals of religious liberty and free speech, essential to any truly civil society, compel us to abhor the first three commandments. Thus, already half of Moses' doctrines cannot be the foundation of our modern society--to the contrary, they are anathema to modern ideals.

Of the rest, it can be assured that shunning adultery has never contributed to the rise of civil rights and democratic principles (despite much trying, there is no Adultery Amendment). It is naturally regarded as immoral--but then it always has been, by all societies, before and since the time of Moses, for the simple reason that it, like lying, theft, and murder, does harm to others, and thus these commandments are as redundant as they are unprofound. They can be more usefully summed up with just three words: do no harm. These words comprise the first commandment of another Greek moralist whose contribution to society lies at the very heart of modern reality: the founder of scientific medicine, Hippocrates.

Finally, we are left with only one commandment, to honor our parents. This of course has been a foundational principle of every society ever since such things as "societies" existed. Yet the greatest advances in civil rights and civic moral consciousness in human history occurred precisely as the result not of obeying, but of disobeying this very commandment: the social revolutions of the sixties, naturally abhorred by conservatives and yet spearheaded by rebellious teenagers and young adults, nevertheless secured the moral rights of women and minorities--something unprecedented in human history--and by opposing the Vietnam war, our children displayed for the first time a massive popular movement in defense of the very pacifism which Christians boast of having introduced into the world, yet are usually the last to actually stand up for. It can even be said that our entire moral ethos is one of thinking for ourselves, of rebellion and moral autonomy, of daring to stand up against even our elders when our conscience compels it. Thus, it would seem that even this commandment does not lie at the heart of our modern society--it is largely an anachronism, lacking the essential nuances that a more profound ethic promotes. ".........

.................................

So I would like to get these commandments shown in schools. Perhaps the Berkeley Unified School District would be a good place for me to start on this crusade.

I would like to hear what conservatives can say in opposition to these commandments.

BTW, google "Christian Heritage" which is a big FOX buzzword, intrigueing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Noble 8 Fold Path is more like the 8 sugestions.. i like that better..
you didnt get stoned to death for transgressing one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My objection
is that your suggestion is of yet another religion. So is your suggestion that if it were the correct religion then you would be for public displays? That is essentially the Right Wing argument.

http://www.boloji.com/buddhism/00110.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How about
None so people can have their faith without people going ape shit over it? I'm not asking for much, just sanity once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. How about
discussing what I actually posted?

Do you disagree with teh notion the actual commandments are unconstitutional? Do you disagree with this Solon guy? Had you heard of him before?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Answers
Do you disagree with teh notion the actual commandments are unconstitutional?
Displaying them on gov property is unconsitutional.

Do you disagree with this Solon guy? Had you heard of him before?
No, I don't keep up with blogs. I prefer to think for myself hence this UU Deist disagrees with the court but putting up more shit to fight shit makes a stinky mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not really answers
nothing personal but you have sort of entered into a message board peeve...that people comment on the first two sentences without reading the post, so why comment at all?

My question isn't whether displaying the Ten Commandments is constitutional. The problem is that the Ten Commandments themselves are unconstitutional proving that this country was not founded on them.

Second: Solon probably doesn't have a blog since he has been dead for roughly two thousand years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. "Anti"-constitutional

Not "un"-constitutional. You are correct that some of the Judeo Ten Commandments are the polar opposite of the US Constitution which would make them anti-constitutional.

And I always cringe when I see that version of the Commandments. As a devout Atheist I have no dog in the Catholic/Protestant fight over the Commandments. But I fail to see how anyone with a grasp of reading comprehension reading the King James Version of the bible can conclude that "worshipping no idols" is a stand alone Commandment rather than part of the first Commandment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. How about
Not being snotty?

10 commandments are not the basis of America. America is based on the Enlightenment philosophy. Arguing over some ancient commandants that require faith alone isn't helping. America is based on the Bill of Rights. People can believe the 10 commandments till Buddha returns but that doesn't make them unconstitutional. In saying that, you're saying Judaism, Christianity, and I think Islam has them are all anti-American religions. While I don't agree with the big 3 religion, they are not unconstitutional. If people want to believe in an abusive step-father in the sky or purple space monkeys, they can do it. It isn't any less American except to convince others that a religion is illegal when our laws say they are not.

People will point out I don't like Christianity but I always said that people will leave it, not be forced from it except by the new gods of Robertson, Falwell, and Dobson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I AGREE...!!!!.................. this is.LINK>
http://www.insider-magazine.com/ChristianMafia

they are taking over, when they do they will morph into these guys

http://www.religioustolerance.org/reconstr.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Buddhism is NOT a RELIGION...... it is a logical path based on reason
see the Four Noble Truths..

http://www.buddhanet.net/4noble.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What you have said is untrue
http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/cultural/religion/buddhism/buddhism.html

"Buddhism is a religion which is based on the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama, the son of a wealthy landowner born in northern India around 560 B.C. In order to achieve spiritual peace, Gautma renounced his worldly advantages and became known as Buddha, or "the enlightened one". He preached his religious views his entire life throughout South Asia"

It could possibly be followed without buying into the religiosity but that doesn't mean it isn't a religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That is Theravada, it is a matter of translation.. see the 4 Noble Truths
Theravada is sect of buddhism from the old days and it has absorbed a lot of Tribal stuff.. that is one translation.. there are many groups.

Theravada is refered to as the Lesser Vechial...

the gods hold no higher status in Samsara than do the hell realms.. they do have great powers in their realms but that power can not save them from samsara, cyclical bebirth, suffering, and death.

so they cant save us either.. religion requires a diety who is creater and manager of the universe.. in religions one must placate a god to reach heaven.

in Buddhism the origion of the universe is not even addressed.. it is refered to as a distraction and totally unimportant..same the gods. Except for the Theravadans who have incorporated tribal stuff into their beliefs.

I practace the Tibetan tradition, Meditation is a method of training the mind.. it is only thru traiing the mind, they use the Logong method.. can one see the emptyness in all manifestation..

Buddhism is a METHOD... not a religoin..

if you cant understand that you are being just like those who you are complaining about.

there is an ongoing debate in some Buddhist communities on this subject.. the ones who argue it is a religion are simply ignorant about what Buddhism is.. they just havent trained their minds to the point where they can conceptualize what Buddhism is.. they just cant let go of the universe being RULED by an outside force.. and see that 'reality' is "Empty" of other than cause and effect... therefore.. by eleminating all cause of the effects of ignorance ..YOU dispel the illusions, revieling the true nature of things..

In Buddhism.... "Nothing Inherantly Exists" ..but it does exist conventually.. realizing the difference is enlightment and liberation from suffering.. the thing one has to learn is that the stuff out there isnt looking back at you.

so does that sound like a religion..?? Nothing Inherantly exists... even god/gods/ no you/me/no eye no ear no nose.

Buddhism is a thing you do personally to achieve liberation form suffering, no person or god can do it for you

but you will believe what you want to.. but lyou lmight go to your local video store and check out "The Little Buddha".. a really nice film,.. made by Disney..tells the story very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thats all very interesting
but what does it have to do with my original post?

The Ten Commandments themselves prove beyond a shadow of a diubt that this nation was not founded on "Judao-Christian" principles since moat of the Ten Commandments are unconstitutional.

That was my point. That has nothing to do with your views on Buddhism since no one is trying to make us all believe Buddhism in this country (to my knowledge, anyway. Perhaps they are but are very sneaky about it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. So the Greek Gods were not Gods?

"religion requires a diety who is creater and manager of the universe.. in religions one must placate a god to reach heaven."


The Greek gods did not create the universe. And there was no heaven. You did have to placate them, but because they were more powerful and would f--- you up if you didn't. Also, there was a chance you might bribe one or more of them to help you out. But mostly the Greek, Roman and Norse Gods were running an extortion racket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. it is all variations on the god theme.. some old crap..extorsion, bullying
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 05:30 PM by sam sarrha
the Buddhists and Hindu's have Demi-gods, their trip is Jealousy and they start wars and cause trouble.. generally bad news types.

and the 10 comandments should be kept in the bible.. the fundies should teach their own children their own religion.. putting the 10 comandments in school is a threat to non christians..just like the pledge.. to identify nonchristians and abuse them.

if they put the 10 Comandmendments in schools then the Koran goes in too.. and the 8 Fold Path and Ahura Mazda, Abraxis, Santan and my personal diatribe.. if history is so important then we got to give everything back to the indians...

they need to get over themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. George Carlin narrowed them down to two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. That reminds me of a restaurant here in DC.
Austin Grill -- it's a tex-mex kinda thing. All their waitstaff wear T-shirts, and on the back it says:

"Be Kind... Tell the Truth... Eat Good Food"

I think that sums it up pretty well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC