Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plutonium: (For those who missed the discussion)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:16 PM
Original message
Plutonium: (For those who missed the discussion)
Archived topic from demlnks:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1583751&mesg_id=1583751

The Bush administration is planning the government's first production of plutonium 238 - a highly radioactive substance valued as a power source - since the Cold War, stirring debate over the risks and benefits of the deadly material. It is hot enough to melt plastic and so dangerous that a speck can cause cancer.

Federal officials say the program would produce a total of 330 pounds, or 150 kilograms, over 30 years at the Idaho National Laboratory, a sprawling site outside Idaho Falls some 100 miles, or 160 kilometers, to the west and upwind of Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming. The program could cost $1.5 billion and generate more than 50,000 drums of hazardous and radioactive waste.

"The real reason we're starting production is for national security," Timothy Frazier, head of radioisotope power systems at the Department of Energy, said at the end of a recent interview.

He vigorously denied that any of the classified missions would involve nuclear arms, satellites or weapons in space.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/06/26/news/nuke.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. so.......what are they going to do with it for "national security"
ask it for advice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. More WMD
Who is going to attack you?
What you going to do with nuke someone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gotta make all those new nuclear hand grenades out of something.
Who knows when we might need to deploy an infantry weapon with a blast radius of half a mile. Okay, pull the pin, release the handle - count, one, two, three -- throw! Duck.:crazy: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush wants to build nuclear plants. Would that require Plutonium 238?
Edited on Tue Jun-28-05 05:48 PM by LiberalAndProud
It could be argued that independence from foreign oil is a matter of national security. (never mind the costs)

- $1.5 billion
- more than 50,000 drums of hazardous and radioactive waste
- the production effort is a potential threat to nearby ecosystems, including Yellowstone National Park, Grand Teton National Park and the area around Jackson Hole, famous for its billionaires, celebrities and weekend cowboys, including Vice President Dick Cheney.

"It's completely wrapped in the flag," said Mary Woollen-Mitchell, executive director of Keep Yellowstone Nuclear Free, a group based in Jackson Hole. "They absolutely won't let on" about the missions.

Plutonium 238 has no central role in nuclear arms. Instead, it is valued for its steady heat, which can be turned into electricity.


http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/06/22/bush.energy.ap/
"Domestic, plentiful, environmenal friendly" source of energy.

Bush is promoting nuclear power as a way to take the pressure off fossil fuels: oil, natural gas and coal.

"It's time for this country to start building nuclear power plants again," said Bush, noting that while the U.S. gets 20 percent of its electricity from nuclear reactors, France meets 78 percent of its electricity needs with nuclear power.

"The energy bill will help us expand our use of the one energy source that is completely domestic, plentiful in quantity, environmentally friendly and able to generate massive amounts of electricity. And that's nuclear power," Bush said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC