Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Bush won Ohio, why is he less pop. than 6 "blue states"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
scoopmeister Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:09 AM
Original message
If Bush won Ohio, why is he less pop. than 6 "blue states"


http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002067.html

In fact, the president's approval rating in the Buckeye State is lower than both the national average (43 percent) and in Pennsylvania (42 percent), which you may recall was won by John Kerry on 11/02/04.

What's more, there are six other states that Kerry won last November where Bush is less unpopular than in Ohio: Maryland, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Washington, Oregon, and Minnesota.

But we thought that Bush won in Ohio.

Didn't he?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I live in Columbus OH .....
.... bush got his ass kicked here. The Gov has 19% approval rating too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush never fucking won Ohio.
Or Georgia, that was Ralph Reed's scam to increase the fundie vote by invisible "ballots". It was all a right-wing scam, Blackwell is who won Ohio. Through out-right stealing fraud and he laughed at the report it happened in other states!

:mad: :mad: :thumbsdown: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Evidently Rove's campagn smear policies
did just the trick. I talked to a number of suburbanites in the south of Cleveland area and they could only site "Bush is a better choice for leader." They truly believed that "Swiftboat crap" and that Osama was coming to eat their babies. Although they could point nothing positive that they liked about Dubya they really found Kerry "oh-so-more-distastefull."

Of course most of them only leave Cleveland to go to Orlando once every couple of years and most of the world remains a mystery to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Osama was coming to eat their babies?
I never heard that one. And bu$h** didn't win Ohio, at least not fair and square that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. More like they were concerned that a "tear-wrist" attack would hit Ohio
Naturally the "baby eating" is not a literal interpretation of how a few fence balancers' gut reacted to Bush. To me, it represented the effectiveness of fascist fear mongering as a political tool.

Many were quite sure that the baddies were comming to perform some level of attack on their little corner of the States. (Yes, Little did they know that the real baddies were just using them to scare them into voting for Shub.) Why anyone would perform an act of terror in an area that is slowly dying on its own due to lack of funancial support and indistrial investment is a mystery to me.

Of course the election had more that its share of questionables in regards to the possibility of shady underdoings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. That's reasonable, but one thing bothers me.
If people were not sold on Kerry, but were so lukewarm for *, why such record turnout in this election? They hated Kerry SO much that they just had to come out and vote AGAINST him? And on top of that, hated him so much that they made sure to vote FOR Bush and not some 3rd-party candidate?

Usually voters, when faced with the choice of two "evils," stay home and don't vote. This just doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. And then there is Florida....
Edited on Wed Jun-29-05 09:23 AM by wakeme2008
........................For...Against.For....Against
Florida........Bush.....41%....53%....46%......50%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC