The more we argue, the more Rove smiles.........

[nochimp04]

let's face it, Lieberman is a bush asslick...Its a no Go...it's either Dean or Clark or both......Either the argument over who is what stops or we get the Chimp again.......Let's back them all...get the mentally challenged and diseased pres out of office or lets all succumb to four more year of this...fighting and arguing about who we will or will not vote for only ensures another stolen election...anyone but lieberman.....anyone but chimpy.

[Ohio Dem]

1. Candidate bashers should be required by DU

to have in their sigs the line "I'm helping Rove."

[RichM]

2. This is poorly thought out, oversimplistic nonsense.

Aren't you the one who just addressed the whole DU board "Hey, assholes"? You apparently haven't learned much since they locked your thread, some minutes ago.

If you understood the most basic features of the situation, you would see that it actually is a very, very big deal, whether or not the Democrats put forth the best possible candidate in '04. Just because you personally are annoyed with the bickering doesn't mean squat. If you don't like the grueling aspects of the process, why don't you go watch television for a while? Just standing there like a halfwit uttering trite BS about Rove isn't helpful in the least.

[roughsatori]

3. You say not to argue and then: "anyone but Lieberman"

That is starting an argument with the Democratic supporters of Lieberman. So you are being hypocritical.

I think it is healthy for us to debate, and yes--argue about our candidates--so I will continue to do so. If you disagree then don't participate.

But the silliest threads on DU are the ones calling for peace so as not to help Rove. Posters who do that are putting out a fire with gasoline. And ought to join a recipe swap board instead of a political one.