Rush Limbaugh attacks Clark in the WSJ

[WhoCountsTheVotes]

The whores at the Wall Street Journal editorial page printed an anti-Clark hit piece by Rush Limbaugh.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004060

And here Limbaugh is using the "Gore attack" trying to paint Clark as crazy or unstable or pathological, comapring him to failed Democratic presidential candidate General McClellan.

"There was also a peculiar side to McClellan. Without provocation, from time to time he would announce that he had no intention of becoming a dictator. And, to be honest, there's something odd about Gen. Clark's personality."

Limbaugh goes through the litany about Clark, but it's nothing you haven't read here on DU. The WSJ will give away Limbaugh's piece for free, since it's not worth anything. Unfortunately, you have to pay for the other articles, a serious look at Clark by Hunt, and the main editorial attacking Dean for not being pro-Nafta enough - a huge point in Dean's favor as far as I'm concerned. Another editorial mentions that GOP insiders are worried that Bush could lose.

[AP]

1. A very common RW tactic: "you're crazy"

They try to make it seem like dissenting with the RWers' view of the world is a sign of some pathological disorder.

It's a way to not have to address the arguments. If they say you're crazy, they can dismiss everything you argue without having to address it.

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

2. That makes him 10 for 10.

No surprise here.

[bif]

3. They better worry that Bush could use

That motherfucker is going down, bigtime! Just like asshole #41!

[_Wayne_]

4. The flies are attracted to the brightest light

And the sad thing is, this is nothing, NOTHING compared to what we'll see in the summer of 2004.

[DinahMoeHum]

14. The flies are also attracted to shit. . .

n/t

:evilgrin:

[dbt]

5. Hooray for Limpballs The Dumbass!!!

Thank God(dess) he's decided to trash Clark. The General couldn't BUY the amount of publicity and name recognition that Fat Boy will hand him for free!

:evilgrin:
dbt

[kentuck]

6. Hey..that's his job!

You didn't really think he was anything other than a propagandist, did you? Oh, he's a humorist! Yeah,sure!

[DemocratSinceBirth]

7. Ironic Dittoes

-:)

[iam]

9. Not completely,

The hater of liberty is also a sportscaster for ESPrNc. So much for honest sports commenary.

[tabasco]

8. Break out the Preparation H

Rush might be having the worse anal problems he's had since they tried to draft him!

[underpants]

10. Rush is printed in the Wall Street Journal?

THE Wall street Journal right? Jesus not only have their editorial pages followed the lemmings over the cliff but Rush is consider serious enough to be in an actual newspaper?

Let's see if I get on I95 North sooner or later I should get to Canada.....

[cprise]

11. Wow- didn't know WSJ published that pig

Glad they're willing to show their true colors for us. I hope that means they're getting desperate.

[WhoCountsTheVotes]

13. they are nervous - about Clark, Dean, and Bush losing

Pick up today's copy, there are a few editorials worth reading. The WSJ editorial pages are worried about the "protectionist" rhetoric coming out of the Democratic party. They praise Clinton for his strong pro-Nafta platform, and they attack Dean for saying he'll add environmental and labor protections to the trade agreement, and even quote Lieberman slurring Dean (no surprise here). My estimation of Dean is greatly enhanced when the WSJ editorial page attacks him over Nafta. Perhaps they do regard Dean as a serious threat.

[wtmusic]

12. Limbaugh in WSJ?

Hallelujah. It's great news--the WSJ has betrayed their true colors (not that we didn't know them already). Very humorous.

[Manix]

15. Rush is a big fat idiot!!

....ooohhh right that's already been said!!!!