Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel Maddow is kicking Bowtie's butt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:05 PM
Original message
Rachel Maddow is kicking Bowtie's butt
"it is a matter of record that she is covert. You will lose that argument"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Carlson is spinning, spinning, spinning
"she does not even approach the definition of covert"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's a talking point
Definitley. Down playing. :eyes: Pathetic. They don't care that what happened is a security issue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. True
Last night Tucker was going on about the Vanity Fair article - another rw talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. but Rachel called him on it
she kept saying that he would LOSE that argument every time.
Way to go Rachel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. With Both Hands Tied, So To Speak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. She kicks his butt every night
At least they don't have that idiot on again tonight who called Valerie Plame a 'file clerk' last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. She stuck to her guns and had the last word
She turned the discussion away from journalism to terrorism and kept it there. Good girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. She rocks.
I wish it was her show. I hate giving Carlson any ratings - even though I don't have a box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I wish it were her show too.
She is always at the top of her game and calls BS when she hears it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. I notice tonight they barely let her say two words about Rove, Miller
et al, before interrupting. They've been talking over her almost constantly, even though they get to go on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fill me in please..
What show was Rachel on....and what exactly did she say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. On The Situation with Tucker Carlson
carlson said that after Maddow told him that whomever outed Plame was a traitor, he spent the afternoon researching it. He said that Plame doesn't meet the minimum standards for being considered "covert" and therefore no crime was committed.

Rachel countered him well. He wants people out in audience-land to email him proof of her status as covert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Geez, why doesn't that surprise me...coming from that idiot?
I try to avoid looking at him or listening to him at all costs!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billkurtmeyer Donating Member (360 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Have you ever noticed this about bow-tie Boy?
When ever he can't come up with a good argument, he just laughs over and over again, as if that is an argument!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm trying to figure out how to podcast her am show
She is the best talent on AAR, and this gig has given me even more respect for her. With a few words she can clairfy issues and finish the argument. She'd make a hell of a lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-06-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. He said if anyone could tell him how outing Plame compromised nat. sec.
to E-mail him the answer. So I did.


:P

Re: How Outing Valerie Plame Compromised National Security - It didn't!


Evening,


Outing Valerie Plame compromised International Security. Her job was tracking down black-market WMD weapons deals.

You're welcome.


Viva.


PS - I learned this at Democratic Underground. Stop by sometime. You might learn something.



Too Cheeky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC