We are fighting them there so we don't have to

[plcdude]

fight them here. Well there goes their most recent rationale for the Iraq war. What can they come up with next?

[Goldmund]

1. LOL

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4036253

Exactly...

[DaveJ]

2. Another close subtle variation

"We are there to teach them to defend themselves..." doesn't work out either since the 'coalition' members can't even defend themselves.

[indepat]

3. Exposes how ludicrous so many pronouncements and rationales are

[stopbush]

4. We fight them there so they can fight them in London.

Seems like that's today's strategery.

[DaveJ]

5. Without the sarcasm

Seriously, this should open a few eyes to the fact *'s strategy for defeating so called 'terrorists' is not working. A working approach takes more brains and less brawn. We needed a President to focus on disarmament, social justice, non-intrusion into the lives of others. Sure 9/11 pissed us off, but that was no reason to run around the world guns blazing with no working strategy.

[FreedomAngel82]

7. Exactly

If only people in November listened to John Kerry. *sigh*

[FreedomAngel82]

6. Yep

Everything they say is backwards and thus they are proven to be wrong.