Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are There Any Details About the London Attacks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 07:43 PM
Original message
Are There Any Details About the London Attacks?
Edited on Thu Jul-07-05 07:48 PM by spooked911
What kind of bombs there were?

What form they were in?

Suicide bombers?

These were pretty powerful bombs!

How the hell did the terrorists get their hands on this stuff?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ICantBelieve Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO, I don't think so...
There aren't any details that I know of yet. The Brits are probably being pretty quiet about what info they have. I actually find it hard to believe that all of the planned attacks came off. What are the odds of that? The Brits are much more terror-aware than we are. You'd think they'd have caught and prevented one. But we haven't heard anything. I think they're being tight-lipped about the details in order to not compromise the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or they are being tight-lipped in order to work out the cover-up.
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ICantBelieve Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, I don't think so...
I think it was terrorists. And I think it was probably al Qaeda related, although not necessarily coordinated by bin Laden's crew. Time will tell. If there were a conspiracy, I don't think it's infested the UK to the point that they could possibly cover up something like this. They have a lot lower population of sheeple than we do. And they don't react the same way to a terrorist attack as we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. They Were Not Particularly Powerful, Sir
Casualties in the enclosed tube trains would have been much worse, of they had been. They seem to have been on timers or cell-phone detonation; the remains of a man strapped to the charge are quite distinctive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The one that shredded a bus seems to have been fairly strong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Very Weak, Sir
An ordinary concussion grenade could have achieved that; the structure involved is quite flimsy. A powerful detonation would have reduced the thing to a charred chassis, and killed all passenfers as well as bystanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. still, explosives are not THAT easy to get...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You Do Not Want To Know, Sir
How readily they can be had or contrived, with a bit of privacy for the latter doing, or how easily they can be moved about, by people with decent nerves....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ICantBelieve Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. More bombs found...
Just heard that they found two unexploded bombs after they evacuated everyone. That should help...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. They should conclusively prove that it was either Syria or Iran
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Most of your questions are what the ongoing investigation is all about.
Speculation runs rampant, both here and in the Corporate Media...but ain't nobody Knows nothin' for sure just yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Some Details
Investigators searching for clues in the attacks here said Thursday that the three bombs used in the subway apparently were detonated by timers, not suicide bombers, and that a fourth device may have been intended for a target other than the city bus that it destroyed. (snip)
A group calling itself the Secret Organization of Al Qaeda in Europe announced on a Web site that it was responsible for the bombings. The announcement also threatened Italy and Denmark, which have provided troops to the American-led coalition fighting in Iraq.

The authenticity of the message could not be confirmed, and several experts said they strongly doubted that it was authentic. (snip)
Counterterrorism officials in London said they were still trying to determine the type of explosives that were used. One official speculated that the No. 30 bus whose roof was blown off at 9:47 a.m. in Bloomsbury was demolished accidentally by a suicide bomber. But another theory gaining momentum was that the bomb exploded prematurely as a bomber was carrying it to an intended target, several American and British counterterrorism officials said.

The officials said that the three subway bombs appeared to have been detonated by timers, not cellphones or other remote triggers. The bombs on the trains were believed to be package bombs and are believed to have been left by the attackers who fled before they went off.

Officials refused to confirm or deny reports that two unexploded package bombs were recovered from trains. A senior American intelligence official said the British had conducted "at least one controlled explosion" of a suspicious package found after the attacks, but he said he could not confirm that the package was another bomb.

The bombings in Madrid and London were separated by 16 months, and the ones in Madrid were set off by cell phones. But the attacks bear eerie similarities and grim lessons for counterterrorism officials. (snip)
"There have been a lot of attempts" in London, said Baltasar Garzón, a Spanish judge who has investigated Al Qaeda for years. "And in this case, they finally hit some of the easiest targets with these trains. Their only real obstacle to this kind of action is getting the explosives. Once they have them, it's very easy to attack targets like Sunday trains."

Mr. Mates, of the Intelligence and Security Committee, said it had been only a matter of time before a coordinated attack struck London. He said the authorities had thwarted at least three coordinated attacks in London since 9/11. "We've caught and prevented those who were trying to get through and stopped them," he said.

Britain has considerable experience investigating bombs and identifying those responsible, based on years of attacks in London and in Northern Ireland by the Irish Republican Army.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/08/international/europe/08intel.html?ei=5094&en=85d10dbe5af4774c&hp=&ex=1120795200&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC