Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arnold on California, We should model ourselves after Texas "

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Scaramouche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 02:56 PM
Original message
Arnold on California, We should model ourselves after Texas "
CITIZEN QUESTION: Under governors Pat Brown and Ronald Reagan, California spent up to 20 percent of its general fund on infrastructures such as roads, bridges, colleges, hospitals and water systems. Now we spend closer to 1 percent. Prop. 53 on the ballot raises that figure to 3 percent. What are your positions on Prop. 53 and what will you do to invest more in California's aging infrastructure?


SCHWARZENEGGER: I am for Prop. 53. I think it's a good beginning. But the fact of the matter is that we need a lot of infrastructures in California. Infrastructure with highways and with the transportation, railroads. Infrastructure with our water supply, infrastructure with our ports. We need that. We should model ourselves after Texas. In Texas, they have committed $140 billion for infrastructure (unintelligible) with building 4,000 miles of transportation -- railways, freeways, highways and all those kind of things. They have already taken the position where we were first in export -- now it's Texas, the first in export. Because they are really aggressive. That's what California ought to do.

Citizen Scaramouche: Just how in hell do you propose to spend a 140 billion dollars without raising taxes. Should we cut Health and Human services like in Texas? Should we have an environmental disaster like Texas? Should we step up executions like in Texas? Should we forget that the energy companies that raped California are in Texas?

Read my lips: California is no new Texas…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is why Arnold will lose
Californians all associate Texas with Enron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. When will this country
stop taking people with single digit IQs who run for public office seriously.

I feel like I have been in the Twilight Zone since January 2001 and it gets worse every day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scaramouche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I heard that Bush got a 100 on an IQ test...
and thought he got a perfect score...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasEditor Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Texas will change...
The whole point of the redistricting effort here is to extend the GOP's 'control' while Texas becomes more and more like California, that is, more Democratic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Texas Isn't Real Popular in California These Days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did he say that with a straight face? I saw a clip of Ahnold

loudly talking over people -- typical neocon tactic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scaramouche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. He said it most emphatically ...
and with a self-righteous, straight face.

Here is the transcript, it's towards the end of the debate:
http://www.kron4.com/Global/story.asp?S=1456808&nav=5D7lIBGK

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grins Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't get this one...
Anyone have the answers here? I looked around a bit and I can't find anything that supports Texas and $140 billion for infrastructure. I did find FEDERAL mentions of that amount, but not specifically Texas. Of course, the federal treasury pays for 45% of eligible state projects - is that what he means?

This just doesn't make sense to compare California to a state whose proudest boast is that sometimes it's ahead of Mississippi. Texas is $10 billion in debt (California whittled it's deficit to $8 billion), and it's state budget is $117 billion (Calif.'s is $98.9B). Given their populations and economys that seems out of balance. The Texas 2003 budget is THE FIRST in 20 years to have a cut, and it includes $3M cuts in water quality (Infrastructure?) and $2M cuts in Telecommunications (certainly infrastructure).

From Molly Ivins column, May 15, '03: "Faced with a $10 billion deficit, the Republicans decided to outlaw gay marriage. Then they kicked 250,000 poor children off a health insurance program that is mostly paid for by the feds in the first place. Picking on the weakest, the frailest, the youngest and oldest Texans has been the sport of choice this session. When the handicapped came to the capital to protest cuts in their services, the governor had them arrested. The combination of cruel budget choices and an unfair process made this the session from hell.

During a committee meeting, Rep. Debbie Riddle (R-Houston) demanded earnestly, "Where did this idea come from that everybody deserves free education? Free medical care? Free whatever? It comes from Moscow. From Russia. It comes straight out of the pit of hell."
I wonder what she says about having to pay for infrastructure?

Is this what AHHH-nold wants to copy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. texas is mississippi with good roads...
why would California want to aspire to that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC