Cush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-05 06:17 PM
Original message |
Hardball: Plame talk coming up? |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-05 06:18 PM by Cush
caught part of it before the last commercial break, but he (Matthews) mentioned that "Woodward attacks the Plame Investigation" as "coming up".....right now it;s still about London
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. my bet is they will white wash it |
|
it will be the issue of journalists protecting their sources, not the outing of wilson as a whistle blower by out his wife a CIA agent
|
Cush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. eh, Woodward will be talking about his new book |
medeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Woodward is defending Miller |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-08-05 06:58 PM by medeak
and Novak for gawd's sake...
|
tishaLA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Tweety and Woodward even lied and said that Novak used the word "operative" in his column all the time. I think BOb Somersby did a L-N search and proved that wasn't the case when this story first broke.
If everyone's right about Miller being a spook, I wouldn't be shocked to hear the same thing about Woodward, too.
|
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-08-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I didn't quite get what Woodward said |
|
Is he saying that it was an accidental leak? That Novak didn't know she was an Agent, called her an Operative (Tweety says he calls everyone that), and it was just a lucky guess? Woodward didn't seem to want to discuss the law or the wording of the statute, but instead mentioned that we are at war.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message |