From
SpeakSpeak News
Brent Bozell
Brent Bozell is president of both the Parents Television Council and the Media Research Center.
In his
latest column for the MRC, Bozell smears National Public Radio's Legal Affairs Correspondent, Nina Totenberg.
Nina Totenberg
Bozell first asks, "Who Started The Supreme Court Circus? " (his dubious phrase for confirmation battles.)
He answers his own question with:
Republicans have been willing to grant Democratic presidents their right to select nominees of their choice, while Democrats have used an explicitly ideological standard since the 1987 trashing of Robert Bork: if you’re conservative, you’re disqualified --- period.
Bozell ignores that the first filibuster against a Supreme Court nominee was of President Lyndon Johnson's (D-TX) nomination of
Abe Fortas.Bozell also ignores the
blue slips used by Republican Senators to block some of President Bill Clinton's (D-AK) judicial nominees. (Bozell isn't only referring to the Supreme Court. He refers to nominations for Attorney General previously in this column.)
Later in the column, Bozell says about
Nina Totenberg:
These Democrats are emboldened because on high-profile, non-electoral fights like this, liberal bias flies fast and furious in the newsrooms. A classic example can be found in the work product of staunchly liberal National Public Radio reporter Nina Totenberg, who has tried to ruin two conservative Supreme Court bids.
In 1987, she took a bitter ex-girlfriend’s diary and ruined Douglas Ginsburg’s nomination by forcing him to admit marijuana use at Harvard in the 1960s and 1970s, after which a parade of politicians from Gingrich to Gore admitted the same, with no career damage. (The Didn’t Inhale President came later.) In 1991, Totenberg took a bitter former employee (and according to some, wanna-be girlfriend) named Anita Hill and forced a new set of hearings around Hill’s unsubstantiated tales of sexual harassment by Thomas. But when Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita Broaddrick came forward with their (far more serious) charges against Bill Clinton, Totenberg’s compassion was nowhere to be found.
What does "compassion was nowhere to be found" mean?
It's her job to report, not to show on-air compassion.
Is Bozell saying Nina Totenberg never filed a report about any woman who made an accusation against Bill Clinton?
If so,
Bozell is lying.Is Bozell saying she did report on Paula Jones, but did so unfairly?
If so, he should give us the airdate of at least one allegedly unfair report, so that we can judge for ourselves.
This column shows the sliminess of Brent Bozell.
It does nothing to diminish Nina Totenberg, one of the greatest reporters in radio.