Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why would his wife being CIA discredit Wilson at all?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:35 PM
Original message
Why would his wife being CIA discredit Wilson at all?
Ok, so Rove's story is that he was talking about Plame in order to counter Wilson's report on the Niger Uranium. Seriously, though, I have never understood how Karl Rove thought he was going to discredit the ambassador by letting everyone know that Joe Wilson's wife was a CIA agent. How exactly does this smear him in any way shape or form? If it was meant as a warning to others not to speak up, that wouldn't be very effective either. How many potential whistleblowers have wives who work for the CIA? Probably not many. In summary, too much risk for little and, as it turned out, no reward. I don't understand it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was supposed to make him look line a hanger-on
Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 04:43 PM by wryter2000
He only got the job because his wife had pull. He's a lightweight, not to be taken seriously.

On edit: the warning is that if you speak out, we'll come after you. Lots of people have bigger secrets than what their wives do for a living.

Some of the Swift Boat crap was even flimsier.

As to it backfiring...it's only backfired with people who care and are paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the strategy was to try and indicate Wilson was not qualified
for the job, he was only sent to Niger because his wife was able to pull some strings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oh, I see.
Still think its stupid, but I guess Rove wasn't completely out to lunch when he did it, as I had previously thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:43 PM
Original message
Of course it's a warning
The message, loud and clear, is that they're willing to retaliate against whistleblowers and their families, without scruples, in whatever way suits them.

Don't have a wife in the CIA? Perhaps you have a dog we can poison. Perhaps you'll get beaten up in a dark parking lot. Whatever it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. the Republicans think that Wilson was unqualified
and that he only got the Niger gig because his wife was a CIA officer whose specialiaty was WMD. They think it was a big leftist plot to undermine Bush's reason to go to war in Iraq and to possibly throw a wrench into the Bush 2004 campaign, as Wilson was a supporter of Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. It wasn't to discredit him.. It was to warn anyone else who might
be thinking about talking. If they were willing to out an agent, and endanger lives for an article he wrote, what WOULD they be willing to do if someone went to congress and spilled the beans about some of the other stuff that had to be going on?

It was intimidation..

Once he complained about it, THEN they went into overdrive about the "disgruntled-former-employee" spiel...that's what they used about John Oneill (WTC), Richard Clarke,and many others..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They sure do disgruntle a lot of employees, don't they?
Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 05:06 PM by Heaven and Earth
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Yes, they ruined her career! duh...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. It doesn't make any sense because it is another BIG LIE...
Another one of BushCo's lies. Gee, shall we mark this as 56,993?

Should we be outraged? Should we tell him he's full of it?

It's so hard to know what to do. These people are reptiles. They never tell the truth. They are reckless evilmongers.

You are so right, H&E---it doesn't make sense that outing Plame as CIA would discredit Wilson. It doesn't. Since when is having a successful, CIA operative as a spouse--a slam? It's not. Karl--the frickin liar---knows it's a fabrication.

He outed her as RETALIATION. He destroyed her cover. He destroyed her job. Her career. Rove hurt that entire family.

His motivation was to HARM.

I"m so sick of the lies, I can hardly bear it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. It was effective...
... Valerie Plame no longer works for the CIA now that her cover has been blown.

As for how effective it was in other ways, we'll never know. How many potential whistleblowers are out there who won't say anything for fear they'll be exposed--either by the White House or by the press?

Last, by implying that Wilson was picked for the trip to Niger by his wife, who worked for the CIA, Novak (and the White House) hoped that Novak's readers would infer that nepotism was involved (thus undermining his credentials to do the mission) and that the CIA was arranging for the husband of an insider to make the trip to protect its own ass.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. I thought that, then re-read... trying to discredit the claim that Cheney
commissioned the trip (and thus take away the "they KNEW, but used the info anyway part of the story.)

Bigger rovian paid off was the implied threat to others who might be tempted to 'leak' or blow whistles. Ala - if we did this to this guy Wilson - imagine what we can and will do to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think what they REALLY were doing
was getting Plame out of the WMD investigation. She was getting close to/or already knew some info they didn't want out. Slamming Wilson was just a bonus. A twofer. JMCPO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. A pre-emptive strike?
The plan to invade Iraq was certainly in motion by that time. Coud be not what she knew, but what she might find out. Think about all that money and the RDX that's gone missing....wonder if Ms. Plame might have been a problem for them?

Looking at it another way....they fabricated the Niger Yellowcake story. So if they were interested in corroborating it, why not send a toady, like Bolton, to confirm it? Why send someone who would be objective and honest to expose the fraud? Why would Cheney request someone to go check the story instead of telling Tenet to send _______?

Outing Plame as an act of political revenge is certainly believable ...but was that the real motive?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. I believe their main target was HER!
She knows alot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. it was a message
to anyone that speaks out against the administration that retribution would be swift and sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. I've had the same question. Some thoughts:
Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 04:54 PM by joemurphy
Lots of people, including journalists and bloggers have speculated about the rationale for the leaks and Plame's outing. Here are some possible motives for it:

1. The Nepotism Defamation - Perhaps Rove felt that Wilson's article was the result of a lackey husband being sent on a politically motivated mission by a well-connected but anti-Administration wife, without CIA approval. Under this scenario leaking Wilson and his wife's existence to the Press would serve to persuade the public that Wilson and his wife were actually anti-Bush administration intermeddlers off on their own private crusade, without CIA support, to undercut the Administration's noble reasons for going to war. By impugning their motives, the report looks biased and/or wrong.

2. Retribution - Rove simply wanted to get back at Wilson, to show him that no one impugns the Bush Administration and gets away with it. Under this theory, Wilson's wife's career is ruined and Wilson is thus punished because Wilson had the temerity to antagonize the Bush Administration.

3. A Slap at the CIA - Under this scenario, Rove et al. were aware that the CIA had many detractors that were genuinely irritated at White House/Pentagon manipulation of intelligence. Hence by outing Plame, the White House was sending a warning to CIA dissidents that further leaks wouldn't be tolerated and that the CIA should toe the administration line in the future.

4. All of the above

Any others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. at the time, there was a struggle between part of the CIA
and the bushturds

over culpability for 9-11 and other issues. the bushturds were making the CIA scapegoats for their negligence/complicity in 9-11.

By outing Plame, they were implicitly saying that Wilson's revelation of bushturd lies was just the CIA trying to make the bushturds look bad, that is, politically motivated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. It WASN'T To DISCREDIT Wilson, it was to PROTECT Chaney's TREASON....LINK>>
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php??az=view_all&address=103x66773

Chaney had been profiteering on the WMD's and allowed a Nuclear Walmart to continue to spread Nuke technology to North Korea, Iran, Pakistan, Libia and other middle eastern countries.. that is why we have that problem today and Chaney was profiteering on it

he had to stop the investigation.. the idea wilson was involved in any way is diss-information, do divert the attention from Chaney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Were they trying to "discredit" him or trying to get revenge...?
Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 05:19 PM by kentuck
for his betrayal, when they were attempting to get the world to support their lies for the war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I vote revenge eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Attack the messanger.
The discussion was temporarily changed: republicans were hooting about Wilson DRINKING MINT TEA at one point, as if that made any difference. Except you can't trust MEN who drink tea, right?

Then it was his wife working there. The point was to get a democrat to say that Wilson was entirely qualified, not merely because he was an ambassador in Africa for years, but because as someone in that position, he had done other jobs for CI. Then they would have tried to make it a tit-for-tat, even-steven exposure. But no one on the Wilson side bit.

The other factor that should always be considered is that, as Joe Klein wrote in TIME, Plame was in the middle of an important investigation into the potential sale of WMD components. Once she was exposed, that investigation was derailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. V. Plame's boss quit.
Soon after Tenet resigned. Hmmm....

I read that she still works with CIA in another capacity, of coures her covert operation was destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC