Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

so what is the difference between Sunni and Shiite, worth killing over

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:53 PM
Original message
so what is the difference between Sunni and Shiite, worth killing over
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Same as the difference
between protestant and catholic...and that's long been worth killing over apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. From some little that I've read
The Sunni have ruled that area for 600 years and they don't like giving up their authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dissent Is Patriotic Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mohammed
was the prophet who Allah decided to reveal the Koran to. When Mohammed died, his uncle's son, Ali, eventually became Caliph. Ali was brutally murdered. Shi'ites believed that the next Islamic leader should be a descendant of Ali, therefore a descendant of Mohammed. Sunni's believed that Caliphs should be elected from a knowledgeable member of the community. This division occured immediately after Ali's death in roughly 661. After Ali's death dynastic rule emerged and the Sunnite efffectively won. This infuriated the Shi'ites as they felt the dynastic Caliphs were not divinely inspired and therefore fallible. Chaos ensues......<very shortened version>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'd like to take your account to make a note
In this case, we see two groups of people. One wants to elect an authority worthy of rule (Sunnis). The others think the bloodline of Ali, therefore Mohammed, should rule (Shi'ites).

The question I pose to everyone (and I mean not to slander any religion here) is why isn't any individual allowed to interpret the Koran the way he or she sees fit for himself or herself? Every human being is endowed with the ability to learn, the ability to reason, and the ability to choose one's course. Isn't this what God did? Why is it that the prevailing attitude is that only a few should exercise that power above all others?

This is what galls me. Why do I need a pope? Why do I need a preacher in the bully pulpit telling me what is right or wrong? Why do I need an ayatollah or any other religious authority? Am I not in charge of my own soul and body?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dissent Is Patriotic Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Obviously you don't need one...
but if someone can convince you that you do, damn, have they got an unbelievable amount of power over you, and your money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. This is what makes me despair
Man is endowed with these awesome abilities to reason and to decide, but history is the story of people throwing away these gifts through deceit and lies or having them taken away by brutal force, and the result is people exist in a lesser state for it. Humans have the ability to rise up above all this and defeat it. They have such incredible, untapped capability that it is awe inspiring. They are so much better than this, but so far, such a movement to unshackle oneself from not only physical chains but mental chains as well has never been sustained. They have all been killed and oppressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Actually, Sir
Islam has an acephalous structure in which every person is entitled to interpert the Koran and Hadith for themselves. No formal authority really compells anyone to refrain from doing so. Authority derives from reputation, from acknowledged scholarship and skill in interpertation, which enables particular individuals to build followings. But it is not quite like, say, occupying a place in the Catholic hierachy. There are various schools of interpertation, to which people adhere, and which are often at odds with one another. In many ways, this diffudion of authority is one of the religion's great strengths, just as a lack of centralization has been pne of the cultures great political weakness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. If I was born with a "good book"
Attached to my butt well I guess I'd follow it but I was not. I'll follow my heart! My good senses... thats what I was born with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Because in conservative Islamic thought only a Muslim is
allowed to rule over Muslims in a Muslim land; and their lapses from righteousness are forgiven as long as they both don't stop the righteous from being righteous, or allow the unrighteous to be unrighteous. The question is, What's a Muslim? And under what conditions is takfir permitted, the calling of a Muslim 'kufr', i.e., infidel? Takfir is widely condemned in some circles, and freely practiced in others.

One exhortation, I think in the Qur'an, is to not allow 'innovation' in religion. Faithful Shi'a believe that the Sunni have added much; faithful Sunni believe that the Shi'ites have added to the revelation. Wahhabi and Salafist (Sunni) thought holds Shi'a to be apostasy.

Were there no mixing of mosque and state, or were the only punishments the Pauline practice of disfellowshipment or excommunication, it wouldn't be a problem. How to say this nicely ... some Muslims believe that enforcement of shari'a is not to be left undone just because unjust rulers neglect it. Death for apostasy is part of Islamic law, and is on the books in more than one Muslim country. Whether or not the people that do this are Muslims or not--they say they are, others hem and haw, and a few say they're not--I'll leave for others to debate.

Then there are the historical battles between the Shi'a and Sunni, and the long-standing assertion of oppression for hundreds of years of Shi'a by Sunnis. It's a blood feud of sorts.

You may not have a belief system that has an authority figure or authoritative text in it. Many belief systems do: for a Muslim, there are many, many options--Sunni/Shi'a, Qur'an vs. Hadith, which school of jurisprudence and interpretation or which subsect of Shi'ism ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Help me here...
If I understand it correctly...Iran has been in the control of the Shiites--the ones who took Americans hostage when Jimmy Carter was president as revenge for giving the Shah safe haven...and the Sunnis were pretty muc in control in Iraq. Now, the Shiites are the majority in the Iraqi government, which means that, pretty much Iran wins the Iran/Iraq war. Shiites in Iran join forces with Shiites in Iraq. Was does that mean for U.S.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. It has to do with the first Islamic Civil War and...
who was to succeed The Prophet, the elective caliphs or The Prophet's cousin and son-in-law, Ali.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't know, but I heard an interesting snip from a young Iranian/American
historian/author on cable news this week about the conflict. His view is that we have stepped into a century old conflict within the bigger Islamic culture. Essentially, he said, we have inserted ourselves in a decades old Islamic civil war. The Sunni and Shiite have been at odds about the lineage of Islam from the Prophet and it's place in their society. I don't know nearly enough about the history to make an informed statement, but his take set me back a little. I realized we are all, here in the West, probably working from a range of "cluelessness"...and, in my view, it is besotted by oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready2Snap Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tyhey don't kill each other for religious reasons
they do it because power here on earth is what really concerns 99% of all religious leaders, and what they can control with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. About the same as Catholics and Protestants or Jews and Muslims.
"God is the only animal to have discovered the one true religion..several of them." - Mark Twain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC