Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Who Gave Rove the Info and Go Ahead?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:02 PM
Original message
So Who Gave Rove the Info and Go Ahead?
Could there be a third?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. My money's on Cheney, but I doubt that will ever come out. If it
does, he'll move to his undisclosed location permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cheney - but Scooter will take the fall for it
The old bastard's mechanical ticker couldn't take the jail time.

http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13
Buttons for brainy people - educate your local freepers today!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. There has to be.
There may be more than three. But there are at least two -- Rove and the person he got this information from. Who knows how far the chain goes up? Libby, Cheney, Tenet? It will be interesting because if the prosecutor is honest and diligent, he should be looking for a conspiracy, unless he believes that Rove overheard a remark by chance, and if he believes that, he is too naive to be a prosecutor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Presumably, Rove has sufficient security clearance
so I wouldn't expect anyone to be in trouble for giving him this information, unless it was for the expressed purpose of leaking it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Did He Have Sufficient Security Clearance During the Time of the Event?
I know he got an official position in the White House recently, but that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I'm not sure what his clearance status was at the time,
but if he didn't have clearance to have that information, and he revealed it, did he commit a crime, or was the crime actually committed by the person with clearance who passed this information on to Rove? I'm not sure about the legalities of this all, but did Novak commit a crime by printing this information, if so, then why hasn't he been charged with passing on classified information? Can someone help me out with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Read Post #11 (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Interesting, but I was wondering about the legality
of leaking this information. It is clearly illegal for someone with security clearance to leak information to anyone without clearance. Is it illegal for someone without clearance to pass on information that requires clearance?

In insider trading, for example, if I passed on confidential information to an outside party, and they made the information public, I have violated my confidentiality agreement and committed a crime, the person who published the information has not (so long as they didn't use the information to trade before making it public). Is this how classified government information works, or is it illegal to pass on classified information even if your not supposed to know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I agree that this is the real question
And I read elsewhere that the crime is at the level of the person who is authorized to know the info giving it to unauthorized people -- that an unauthorized person passing the info to another unauthorized person is not the crime.

So the question is whether Rove was authorized.

My guess is they will play on the "it was common knowledge" card so that the real leaker will never have to be revealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rove and Bush are joined at the hip when it comes to dirty tricks, and
have been for three decades. You'd have to be a practicing ignoramus to believe that Bush didn't know about this. Hell, he probably came up with the idea, himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's What I Think...
I also think the whole Administration knew very well what was going on, but played dumb as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. IMO they had a high level meeting in the WH
and they all decided together to leak Plame's name. They're all in on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainman99 Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh, what a tangled web they weaved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think Bolton
but it probably goes higher than that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. The White House Iraq Group (WHIG) was formed by Card ...
... probably at Cheney's direction.

* Karl Rove
* Karen Hughes
* Mary Matalin
* Jim Wilkinson
* Nicholas Callo
* Condi Rice
* Stephen Hadley
* Scooter Libby

These are the people who conspired to blow Plame's cover.

The claim that they thought she was openly working for the CIA is TOTAL BULLSHIT! She worked for a covert front organization (now also blown) and had NO OPEN CREDENTIALING as an agent for the US government. She was covert all the way ... a field agent, not an analyst ... with contacts (many now dead) in other countries regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction and their trafficking. Of all of the areas of intelligence to expose for partisan political reasons, they chose the one that's (supposedly) most critical.

It's IMPORTANT to note that her role in WMD intelligence may have led to her being able to puncture the balloon of lies the WHIG was fabricating. It's a nuisance to have a field expert that can show when you're defrauding the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's called "Sycophancy" And that's what these idiot's are all about!
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 06:54 PM by orpupilofnature57
Does it matter, ken starr was like Torquemada, when it came to fellatio,this idiot breaks a law a minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC