Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel is kicking Monica Crowley's lying ass right now on MSNBC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:05 PM
Original message
Rachel is kicking Monica Crowley's lying ass right now on MSNBC
On Tucker's show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wasn't that fun?!
HeeHee! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. they keep saying that Plame sent Wilson to Niger to investigate the
yellow cake.

Isn't that a bald face lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. she's working hard to get her pissy, petty little digs in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Wilson said that his wife recommended him for the job. But ...
she was not in a position to send him to Niger. He says he was sent by the CIA after Dick Cheney's office asked that the Niger yellowcake story be checked out.

Bottom line, the administration didn't like it when Wilson said the documents alleging that Iraq was trying to buy nuclear material were FORGED.

I think the big story is ... WHO FORGED THE DOCUMENTS????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Who forged the document?
That's really not very important. The point is that the policymakers in the regime knew it was a fake and used the story anyway.

There is a black market for documents like that. The buyers are really only interested in genuine documents, but it should be easy to see why some people would be tempted to produce forgeries.

Governments, including ours, buys them for their intelligence value. I'll bet the US taxpayers shelled out a pretty penny for that one. It turned out to be a very crude forgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. gotta link?
tia :toast:

as to who forged the docs, probably some poor hack in niger but the real question is why were the y used after being debunked by our OWN intel?

that goes right to the TOP.

and the TRAITOR who outed our CIA operative, working on WMD's (fer christ's sake) as a political threat also goes straight to the top, bet.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
31.  You want to know what a right-winger told me about who forged
the documents? He said the forged document came from France as if France was out to git W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Sorry I have a hard time watching Tucker
He makes me want to hit something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I agree. It was my first time and it was a two to one scream match.
Waste of time and soooooo annoying!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did I Miss Something Good?
If so, I'll have to stay up to midnight to listen to Rachel. I love her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlwaysQuestion Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. What did she say? What did she say?
I never watch the Tucker show--or that station. But do, clue us in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Rachel confronted Tucker and Monica
about them carrying water for the * administration.

They kept saying that Wilson is the liar, and his report on yellow cake was false.

Rachel wasn't having it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. So, they are repeating what they know to be lies.
I won't watch that show. I won't watch any show where pathological lying is typical. Those people should be freakin' sued, their careers permanently ruined, their finances destroyed and their faces marked with persistent shame!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. yes
(and their eyes gouged out maybe?)

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Uh-huh, and so the answer is to destroy the CIA's 20+year project creating
covert eyes and ears on WMDs around the world, and get some of those people killed, and put all their lives in danger including Plame's. Nice work, Dick. And what is the REAL reason you did it? (--had a litte covert project going to plant WMDs in Iraq, did you? or was it the sheer profit of all those arms deals?)

See

Plame...the tip of the iceberg... (Plame maybe investigating Cheney arms deals when they busted her CIA weapons op)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2178477#2180220

And
(Miller/Plame/David Kelly)
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/3/17138/30618

This is far more stinko than it appears. Tucker and Monica are only spouting the cover story.

-------

The answer to the stink in Washington DC is to restore our right to vote, by throwing Diebold, ES&S and brethren out of the election business NOW--or at the least achieve some measure of election transparency with paper ballot backups, no secret programming code and strict auditing. The only place where we can get that done is in state/local jurisdictions, where the authority over election systems still resides, and where ordinary people still have some say. Don't let the powers-that-be silence our voices on election reform! See the DU Forum "2004 Election Results and Discussion" for information and action ideas:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. I find it quite amusing
that they are ganging up on Rachel.
Originally, they had 3 points of view--Democrat, Republican, and Libertarian.
Now, they have condensed it down to 2 Republicans vs. 1 Democrat.
Rachel has smacked down all her opponents,and now, they are bringing the vile filled creature Monica Scowley.
She is one bitter bitch.
I just wonder how long Rachel will hang around while they gang up on her, however, she is doing a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. did I miss it
I really don't like monica crowley x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. I soooo love Rachel
Really.

I mean come on...big brown eyes, PhD...

she's a lesbian super-star

*swoon* :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jane_pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Tucker on polygamy...puke-o-rama
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 08:15 PM by jane_pippin
God, he's a dick and an idiot. At least Rachel's there to point it out.

edit for spelling. d'oh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlwaysQuestion Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Right on! I could get into this
I do dig your characterization. Of course you can't villify that SOB enough for me. Keep the epithets zinging...so long as you keep firing them off in the right directions. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jane_pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. ha ha. thanks
Although to be fair, the "dick" is Jon Stewart's characterization. The "idiot" was just plain obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlwaysQuestion Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Maybe, but a reminder never hurts!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Who IS Monica C.? Dislike Her Lying Ass Profusely. Rachel Kicked Butt
AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Is there one part of that woman that is real?
She's such as phoney shill for the administration.

She's phoney on the inside - and on the outside.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. I have to confess, that is the only reason I'll watch Tucker's show.
Because of Rachel. This woman turns me on and I'm hetero. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I was so shocked to see her on, very cool. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Weird, I Said Same Thing :-D Rachel's My "Girl Crush"
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. Monica Crowley is trash.
Anyone who was this/close to Nixon must have sold their soul. AND, I can not bring my self to watch bow tie, regardless of who he has on or what the subject. But thanks for the good laugh. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. Tucker just said it all
"I hate to side with Rachel"

Stupid fucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Did I hear Tucker say earlier than Karl Rove should be fired but
this is a non-story...all in the same breath? How in the heck can you fire someone over a non-story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. because the mean old dems
are making a big deal out of nothing so that means they will have to placate them.
:wtf::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. Thats my Rachel
You know I think she can whup Tucker in a fist fight as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. MSNBC should give Rachel Maddow her own show
Take off stupid Tucker, and put Rachel on right after Keith. What a double header that would be!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Who would name thier kid Tucker
Cmon that was asking for trouble in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I wonder who told him to wear a bow-tie...
His mom should be sooooo proud of her little "Tucky"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. I think he's a jimmy olson fan
That would explain the tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
37. Some One Posted The Memo About Plame Sending Her
husband to Niger. If I read it correctly, the WH is LYING about that too! The dates don't match the comments!

But I just skimmed it and I COULD be wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC