Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

July 11, 2005: The day the Bu$h administration broke the law, again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 02:39 PM
Original message
July 11, 2005: The day the Bu$h administration broke the law, again
The Metrics Of Success In Iraq

By David S. Broder


Sunday, July 3, 2005; Page B07

President Bush is facing an early legal deadline to deliver what he has been most resistant to providing: a set of specific benchmarks for measuring progress toward military and political stability in Iraq.

Under a little-noticed provision of the defense spending bill passed by Congress in May, Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld has until July 11 to send Capitol Hill a "comprehensive set of performance indicators and measures of stability and security" two years after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

A Pentagon spokeswoman, responding to my inquiry, said last week, "We are working toward completing the report by the due date."

If and when it comes in, it could do much more than the president's Tuesday night speech at Fort Bragg to provide a factual basis for judging how close we may be to reaching our goals in Iraq.

<clip>

More at the link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/01/AR2005070101818.html


As noted by Think Progress today:

July 11 Comes and Goes: No Iraq Indicators

July 12, 2005

<clip>

The deadline for this data? July 11. Yesterday.

As it turns out, the administration is apparently more willing to violate the law than give Americans a clear, detailed picture of where we are in Iraq, and where we’re headed. A spokesman for the Pentagon told me today that those Iraq indicators have been “delayed” and that there is currently no specific date set for their release.

More at link:
http://thinkprogress.org/



Iraq. Plame. Abu Ghraib. Guantanamo. DSM. Bolton. ..... crime after crime after crime. Way more damage to America than any bomb could ever cause; the insidious neoconster cancer continues unabated.




Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us - How ever long it takes, the day must come when tens of millions of caring individuals peacefully but persistently defy the dictator, deny the corporatists their cash flow, and halt the evil being done in Iraq and in all the other places the Bu$h neoconster regime is destroying civilization and the environment in the name of "America."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. is that all ya got?
*sarcasm off now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Finally, it directs Rumsfeld to provide, ...
... -- either in public or in classified annexes -- an estimate of U.S. military forces needed in Iraq through the end of calendar 2006 and the criteria the administration will use to determine when it is safe to begin withdrawing forces from that country.

Link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/01/AR2005070101818_2.html


This is not a joke.

It is a violation of law.

It is violation of law that involves the well-being of each and every member of our Armed Forces.

To violate this law is to compromise them and our National Security.


I have already sent this to Congressman Conyers requesting his advice as to how to bring attention to a blatantly illegal act.


Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now if only there were somebody in some other branch of government,
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 04:47 PM by enough
to hold them accountable. But no, that would be constitutional goverment.

Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. As we are doing with Rove, with DSM, with Iraq, ....
.... it is truly "We The People..." who are going to purge the law-breakers from our government - as it should be.

This is particular illegal action is potentially one that every Citizen can understand and can connect to the well-being of our Armed Forces. Thus, let's spread the word.


Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Accountable?
How do you spell that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. there ya go agin, consipirizing the DU populace!
You dont have any real proof about Iraq and the DSMs don't count and Gitmo was just a prank and its not all the neoconsters fault and you're making me uncomfortable so you must be a racist out to hurt the cause!! You freepy infiltrator you!

and uhmm :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Are there any moderate elected Republicans , or are they all complicit?
Can it be that the entire gop is willing to place party loyalty to the administration over protecting the constitution and our democracy? Are they blind to the treasonous action committed by the neo con thugs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. This junta's pattern of breaking laws is fairly well-established.
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 10:44 AM by Just Me
When are they going to be prosecuted/convicted/sentenced?

Soon, I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yet more proof that
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 10:48 AM by djohnson
This administration is off doing its own thing, independent of any accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Pressure grows as Pentagon misses deadline on troop levels"
Pressure grows as Pentagon misses deadline on troop levels

By Bryan Bender


July 12, 2005

The Bush administration yesterday came under more pressure to outline the number of American forces that may need to stay in Iraq over the next two years after the Pentagon failed to meet a 60-day deadline set by Congress to provide a detailed plan for training Iraqis and for likely US troop levels.

The report to Congress, due yesterday, was required under the $80 billion war spending legislation approved in May. It is intended to help answer one of the most pressing questions hanging over the American-led occupation: when the United States might be able to begin drawing down the estimated 140,000 forces in Iraq.

The White House and Pentagon are facing rising calls from Democrats and Republicans for a more detailed strategy in Iraq -- calls that grew louder yesterday.

"I am deeply disappointed that the administration failed to comply with this initial . . . deadline," Representative Martin T. Meehan, a Lowell Democrat and senior member of the Armed Services Committee, told Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld in a letter. "It is long past due for the administration to provide Congress with meaningful information to evaluate our progress in Iraq."

<clip>

More at the link:

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/07/12/pressure_grows_as_pentagon_misses_deadline_on_troop_levels/


The failure of the Pentagon to comply with the law is being noticed.


Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. is it possible that e voting has rendered the republicans
totally fearless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Certainly contributory; especially since the dominionist nutjobs ...
... control the "levers."


Peace.

www.missionnotaccomplished.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Soft on treason. No respect for law.

Is this really what 48% of Americans voted for last November?


Great post, UL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC