Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Each instance of disclosure of Plame's identity would be a separate crime.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:31 PM
Original message
Each instance of disclosure of Plame's identity would be a separate crime.
Somebody posted this link and I read it and at the bottom was the statement above. So every time Plame was identified, it is a separate crime. How many crimes could be charged?



http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,724804,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's all if the same conditions apply.
Let me walk you through this.

Unknown official informs Rove, Scooter Libby and so on that "Joe Wilson's wife" is a CIA employee covering weapons of mass destruction but does NOT tell them that she is Non-Official Cover (NOC). Rove, Libby etc. go spread the word that Wilson's wife is CIA and that this is nepotism, a private political agenda, this is not to be believed, President's enemies in the CIA trying to undermine the case against Saddam Hussein and vigilance against the Arab Atom Bomb threat, etc etc.

Because Rove, Libby etc. do not KNOW that she is undercover, and do not care enough to find out for themselves, they shield themselves from knowingly divulging her undercover status. (In other words, don't ask, don't tell, and everyone's ok!) This also applies to the reporters who will actually do the divulging to the public on double-deep cross my heart background.

A lot hinges on who this unknown official is, and whether what Rove and Libby did is sufficient for the purposes of charging them with felony conspiracy, which qualifies them for being charged with leaking the identity themselves because they conspired with the person who leaked it to THEM, because THEY were obviously not authorized to get this information in the first place. NOC means no one's supposed to know that she works for the CIA **AT** **ALL**.

Hope this clears things up. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Could be 6 counts - one for each journo contacted.
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 06:59 PM by leveymg
Article is interesting in that it positively IDs Scooter as the second source, and raises the question about who their source was for information about Plame. It assumes it was a 3rd gov't official - that points toward Cheney, who originally tasked Wilson to go to Niger to check on the Iraqi yellow cake sale story.

Certainly, Cheney would have the security clearances to know about Plame's undercover role, which was first publicly revealed by Novak. Others have speculated that Miller might be the source for Rove and/or Scooter - this can't be ruled out, until the indictments are unsealed, that is.

After Novak's publication, the counts would stop, as her undercover identity would henceforth be public knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now we are clocking in some major prison time and tack on
perjury obstruction of justice and abuse of power and thats alot of hours!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's what I was thinking... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC