ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 12:38 AM
Original message |
What should we call the Bush "tax cut"? |
|
since we all know that is a very misleading term. I think "welfare for the rich" is pretty accurate, except unlike people that actually need it the rich don't even have to apply to receive these welfare handouts.
|
Birthmark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 12:39 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Theft from our children |
FlemingsGhost
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 12:49 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Cut? More like a gaping wound... |
|
They are bleeding us dry.
|
carpetbagger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 12:56 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Putting the bills on the credit card. |
|
Nothing more, nothing less. What the people who have the extra cash (and very little of it came in those checks) have bought with it, I have no idea, but that's what it is.
|
Myra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 01:00 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Soup kitchen for billionaires |
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 01:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Just some ideas to inspire the more creative.
How about:
Deficit Enhancement Program. Calls to mind the Healthy Forests Initiative.
Or Wage-Earner Screw.
Or Operation Surplus Reduction.
It isn't a hand out. It isn't a hand up. It's a hand over! As it "Hand it over!"
Or Enrich the Rich!
|
Mechatanketra
(903 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 04:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
One key to the 'tax cut' is, like any GOP plan, it's 'retroactive' (at least, for certain entities -- not you, of course ...) When you 'cut' taxes retroactively, basically, you're really just handing out money from the treasury that, if previous budgets were balanced, has already been spent
(Imagine I pay you $100 a week, and you naturally budget to spend that $100 each week to cover your needs. Then 5 weeks later I institute a $30 "retroactive pay cut", and insist you fork over $150 bucks on the spot. Whammo! Instantly you're at least $50 in default even after payday -- I might as well just mug you.)
So that's what we've got: the Bush debt bump. Fun, ain't it?
|
radfringe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 04:33 AM
Response to Original message |
Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 04:58 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Weapons Of Mass Deductions! |
|
For his campaign Con-tributors!
|
JNelson6563
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 05:02 AM
Response to Original message |
0rganism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 05:03 AM
Response to Original message |
10. How about "Looting the Nation's Future"? |
|
"Piracy"? "Spend-and-spend conservatives"? "Dude, where's my pension?"
|
dusty64
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 06:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
how about one we heard endlessly during the Clinton years "Quid Pro Quo". Funny how who NEVER hear it now.
|
Pepperbelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 06:52 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Reverse Robin Hood Scheme nt |
lanlady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-26-03 06:53 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Carol Moseley Braun had a good term-- |
|
--in last night's debate. She called it "borrow and pass the buck."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:35 AM
Response to Original message |