Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I gather that the RW is starting to trash Fitzgerald.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:41 AM
Original message
I gather that the RW is starting to trash Fitzgerald.
I got that from a poster on another thread, and haven't seen any instances yet myself, but if this is so, I think it can mean only one thing.

They're trying to defang the public uproar that might result from having Speedy Gonzales fire Fitzgerald from the Special Prosecutor job. Remember Archibald Cox & the Oct 1973 Saturday Night Massacre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. If so, it's utterly predictable
This goes higher than Rove, I'm telling you. He's just the consigliare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
distantearlywarning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was actually wondering when this would happen.
And if he turns out to be completely impeccable, they'll just make up lies about him. And who's to say otherwise when our press are all apparently on the WH payroll.

I pity Fitzgerald at this moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yep - WSJ calls him an "unguided missile"
"But now Mr. Fitzgerald has become an unguided missile, holding reporters in contempt for not disclosing their sources even as it becomes clearer all the time that no underlying crime was at issue."

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006955
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. "no underlying crime was at issue"? So the WSJ seems to say that
the jury is already back with an acquittal and Fitzgerald is unaware of it?

Ay-fucking-Yay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. of course the WSJ forgets Starr was appointed to investigate White water.
and ended up as the ultimate unguided missile.

We should just say, "We remember what happens when a special prosecutor goes off script. We feel your pain."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Since you mentioned that
possibility about a week ago, I've been wondering if it might happen. It was one of the strangest events of the Watergate crisis, and really marked the greatest threat to the Constitution in the entire scandal. I am convinced this administration is capable of far, far worse things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. If Fitzgerald is smart about it, he'll bring
indictments within a day or two after Cooper's testimony. Then if they fire him, he'll have the charges and the seriousness of them in front of the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It's a recurrent thought of mine.
If all else fails, pull the plug on the prosecutor & appoint Ted Olson or Jim Baker or somebody to wrap it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I doubt he gives a damn
He has kept his information close to the vest and because of that he's very dangerous to them. A man doing an ethical job who can't be bought in today's America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Corporaganda press cannot allow this lying us into a war cut into
profits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC