Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 11:41 AM
Original message |
I gather that the RW is starting to trash Fitzgerald. |
|
I got that from a poster on another thread, and haven't seen any instances yet myself, but if this is so, I think it can mean only one thing.
They're trying to defang the public uproar that might result from having Speedy Gonzales fire Fitzgerald from the Special Prosecutor job. Remember Archibald Cox & the Oct 1973 Saturday Night Massacre.
|
smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
1. If so, it's utterly predictable |
|
This goes higher than Rove, I'm telling you. He's just the consigliare.
|
distantearlywarning
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I was actually wondering when this would happen. |
|
And if he turns out to be completely impeccable, they'll just make up lies about him. And who's to say otherwise when our press are all apparently on the WH payroll.
I pity Fitzgerald at this moment.
|
Jersey Devil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Yep - WSJ calls him an "unguided missile" |
|
"But now Mr. Fitzgerald has become an unguided missile, holding reporters in contempt for not disclosing their sources even as it becomes clearer all the time that no underlying crime was at issue." http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006955
|
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. "no underlying crime was at issue"? So the WSJ seems to say that |
|
the jury is already back with an acquittal and Fitzgerald is unaware of it?
Ay-fucking-Yay
|
Hamlette
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. of course the WSJ forgets Starr was appointed to investigate White water. |
|
and ended up as the ultimate unguided missile.
We should just say, "We remember what happens when a special prosecutor goes off script. We feel your pain."
|
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Since you mentioned that |
|
possibility about a week ago, I've been wondering if it might happen. It was one of the strangest events of the Watergate crisis, and really marked the greatest threat to the Constitution in the entire scandal. I am convinced this administration is capable of far, far worse things.
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. If Fitzgerald is smart about it, he'll bring |
|
indictments within a day or two after Cooper's testimony. Then if they fire him, he'll have the charges and the seriousness of them in front of the public.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. It's a recurrent thought of mine. |
|
If all else fails, pull the plug on the prosecutor & appoint Ted Olson or Jim Baker or somebody to wrap it up.
|
Corgigal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I doubt he gives a damn |
|
He has kept his information close to the vest and because of that he's very dangerous to them. A man doing an ethical job who can't be bought in today's America.
|
Al-CIAda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
9. The Corporaganda press cannot allow this lying us into a war cut into |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message |