Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plame is a fucking hero....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 12:58 PM
Original message
Plame is a fucking hero....
From a former classmate of Valerie Plame.
http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/7/13/04720/9340

" <Valerie> became a non-official cover officer. ...That meant she agreed to operate overseas without the protection of a diplomatic passport. If caught in that status she would have been executed."



How DARE these traitorous COWARDS even imply that Rove is a hero for outing Plame. Here was a woman who was willing to give her life for her country, and this fucking COWARD Rove used her as a political tool with complete disregard for national security.

Here is a woman who actually put her life on the line...and this motherfucking COWARD says she's "Fair Game"?

What the fuck is wrong with this picture? I'm too flabbergasted to be angry. I'm in fucking shock right now.

There is not enough voltage in this world to electro-shock me back in to coherence....

Someone please help me understand

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. The criminals are running the courts & prisons.
That's the best metaphor I can think of... did you see the WSJ editorial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. Yes, I saw it.
The more I delve deeper into the bowels of this affair...the sicker to my stomach I become.

This is probably my first GD thread...It took a lot for me to post in here... :D

How have you been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Heh... I was wondering...
I hadn't seen you around this place much before.

I'm okay, you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. I'm doing well. Working my ass off.
I only log on a couple of times a day now. I just had to vent a little. I feel much better now. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not by my understanding.
She was a spook.

By all means, eviscerate Rove for her outing. But I'm not forgetting for a moment that the CIA has been a blight on the globe for half a century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. she was tracking underground WMDs
and she is not guilty for ALL the CIA's sins which are long and brutal but i respect the ones fighting TERRORISM at home and abroad.

exIntel folks for sanity have been giving the neoCONs hell ;->

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. you're right
I posted in a querulous pique. ;)

And I've even said before, the CIA is not a monolith; it's a labyrinth. Some corners are darker, and some lighter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Every Repug that stick up for Rove, should be called a traitor....
It is outrageous that these Repugs are out defending this traitor...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree Plame is a brave woman...
But being a NOC doesn't necessarily make it so. Manuel Noriega was a NOC. So, possibly, were Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden, at one point or another.
All that means is you're getting paid by the CIA, but you're not officially with the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. Yes. The CIA stuff doesn't matter.
My frustration comes from the fact that here is a woman that is willing to do a job that few have the courage to do...and this is the way these fucking cowards respect her....and these are the dipshits that are supposedly "strong on National Security"???

And they want to praise Rove for it?


WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. There are CIA agents ... and then there are CIA agents.
Ms Plame was an operative who had absolutely no connection to the CIA sponsored coup against Allende. Ms. Plame's responsibility was the tracking and countermining of interests' desire to obtain various weapons of mass destruction.

If you wish to damn the CIA agents for what they did in Chile - go ahead. I'm all for it. Henry Kissinger is a good place to start. That was his baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wow. Welcome to DU. Enjoy your stay.
Yeah, we all hate the CIA around here. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Remeber? I didn't remeber a god damn thing
I'll bet you hate the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Yeah, so that makes it ok to out them
and risk their deaths and the deaths of those around them?

Ooooookay, then.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The granite cookie didn't take long.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Nope, after I posted that I thought
"watch he's already gone" and he was!

(But I'm sure still reading....)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Yeah, That Was Pretty Darned Fast!
Exact same thing happened to me. Read the message, said "Probably a goner." Checked. Yup!
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Remeber? Don't you mean rember? As in:
Rember? You rember. Rember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hero my ass! She's CIA for Chrissakes.
Just google Phoenix Program to see what the "heroic" CIA does. You might also check out "Allende", "Guatamala", "Patrice Lumumba", "Mossadegh", "Cuba", and many more examples of murder, assasination, mass killings, and subversion.

They're about as "heroic" as the SS and Gestapo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You might as well hate all Americans because of the acts of the Bush govt
Hasthe CIA done awful things? Yes.

Does that mean everything te CIA does is awful? No. Does it mean every agent is awful? No.

You want a CIA and a US govt that is more decent? I do.

You want to live in 2005 without an intelligence agency? I don't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You're answering your own questions, rummy-style!
:rofl:

Just kidding!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I'm sure there were SS guys that loved puppies and kittens.
And, were upright citizens who didn't like their bosses.

The CIA like the School for the Americas should be shut down and the thugs that work for them brought to justice in the ICC.

I'm supposed to respect and sympathize with people who chose to work for an organization well known for it's crimes against humanity?

I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Again, you may prefer to live in 2005 without an intelligence agency.
I do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Good for you. How patriotic.
If you are capable of overlooking a little assasination here, some mass murder there, the arming and direction of death squads, as necessary to our "national security" (aka protecting corporate interests) you're welcome to the CIA and it's happy little group of bungling thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. My only question for you is how you propose the US manage
international affairs - including monitoring threats to the US - without a CIA.

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. By being honest. A novel idea, I know, but it might work.
Instead of trying to control the world we might attempt joining the world community and put the spooks and their fellow murderers to work doing something useful.

As for their "intelligence gathering" efforts, their track record is dismal and their failures monumental.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. So you'd prefer no intelligence agency function at all? Okay.
You may not know it but all those other countries in the world community also have intel agencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Oh, I see! It's their fault that the CIA murders people.
Funny how most of the world's intelligence agencies seem to get by without knocking off people that the current bosses deem "enemies". You seem to be able to separate the activities of the CIA from your perception of what an intelligence agency is "supposed" to do.

The "The other guys do it, too" is a pretty thin defense. Try it the next time you rob a bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Again, I'm asking what you propose we do without an intel agency.
Do you think if we disband the CIA today there will be no terrorists or enemeies looking to harm the US?

I agree we should not seek to control the world but should partner with the world community. But even those countries that already do that - as you suggest - still have intel agencies.

So I'm asking what you propose we do without an intel agency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. How about we disband the CIA and form an intel agency.
That, if necessary, gathers intelligence. Period. One that's budget is open for the public to see. One that's required to present ALL of it's operational doings and methods to congress for review. One whose members are held personally responsible for any crimes committed, where they were committed, or in front of an international tribunal. That would elimate the "I was only following orders", "I didn't know what was really going on" defense used by the agents and their chair bound bosses.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. So you want another agency with a different name charged with the
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 04:02 PM by mondo joe
same official responsibilities?

A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.

And don't you think a number of CIA operatives would be first in line for jobs in this NEW agency you speak of? Or do you suggest abandoning any knowledge or expertise we currently hold?

Why not just leave it be the CIA and reform whatever practices need to be ended?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. Well said n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
46. Nice generalization.
I was talking about one woman.

One woman who was willing to risk her life for her job.

I would not risk my life for my job. Never.

I respect this woman.
People like her make the chickenhawks really stand out as the fucking cowards they are.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Look Carefully-This Is How The Government Treats It's
loyal employees who risk their lives for this country. Both Wilson and Plame had many years of experience and their reputations and resumes' are sterling.


See how the government eats one of it's own....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Now you guys see how republicans treat women!
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 01:36 PM by cat_girl25
And nominated for an ex-Texan (Sluticus).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm really surprised by some of these posts.
I once considered a job as an analyst in the CIA. I thought a career in intelligence would be one way in which I could serve my country. It never occurred to me that I'd be held personally responsible for every crappy decision ever made by the organization.

I wonder if the same people glad Plame was exposed because they dislike the CIA are expressing the same satisfaction over military casualities because they dislike the war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. The casualties in Iraq are due to CIA types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. The casualties in Iraq are because
the fucking neocons need the casualties to accomplish their greedy ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Incorrect. The casualties in Iraq are due to policy decisions.
Not the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Based on CIA "intelligence".
I know, I know, "they were pressured by the administration". "They allowed themselves to be swayed by political operatives". "The administration misused the intelligence", etc, etc.

What all that boils down to is, "We were just following orders." A familiar phrase post 1945.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Actually, based on cherry picked data and a good deal of denial.
We already know Bushco ignored intel warnings and latched onto what he wanted.

The CIA doesn't make policy - it supplies data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. OK. So where were the CIA "heroes" that blew the whistle?
That's like the Eichmann defense. "I was only coordinating train schedules".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I recall reading about them in the news - about how Cheney did
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 02:06 PM by mondo joe
things no other VP had ever done before, and how vague the case against Iraq was.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
55. Ambassador Wilson to START, hello...
and there were many others that spoke up, who are noted here and in the M$M as well.

fyi

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
57. I'm sure they are there lurking in the darkness waiting for the chance..
...to expose this poor excuse for an administration.

I think this may finally be their chance. The administration tried to blame the CIA for "faulty" intelligence while at the same time endangering an entire operation.

I'm sure their revenge will be sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. Actually the CIA was the one contradicting Bushco's propaganda & agenda
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 02:21 PM by Garbo 2004
Tenet played lapdog to Bush but the analysts (like Ray McGovern, etc) were against the war because they knew the justifications were bogus. Which is why Bushco ignored the CIA warnings about "suspect" intel, set up the Office of Special Plans in the Pentagon to "fix" the intelligence to support their agenda and then scapegoated the CIA, claiming it was the source of the "bad intel" when the jig was up.

The Plame outing was to discredit Wilson, the CIA (and their views that Iraq was no significant threat re: WMD and the "intel" Bush was pushing was BS), and to cover up the fact that Bushco lied us into war.

As Minstrel Boy said, the CIA is not a monolithic entity. But Bushco appointed Goss to clean house, remove any independent analysis and make sure their agenda is served. That's NOT a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Which is a damned good reason to shut CIA down.
Among many other better reasons. Or, at least, take it out of the executive's hands and put it into the hands of congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. The CIA was (still is?) accountable to Congress if recollection serves
(to Congressional oversight committees). Also Congress confirms the CIA director. (Don't know what specifically may have changed with the intel reshuffle and Intel Czar, but the CIA as I recall previously was accountable to Congress.)

But of course, who's got the majority votes in Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. You are letting facts could your potential for misdirected hatred!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. Do you guys think that maybe the CIA has it in for the * administration..
...for making them look like they got the intelligence "wrong"?

I would certainly be pissed if all along I was screaming "this is bullshit!" and then at the end get blamed for providing "faulty intelligence".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I especially like how some hate the CIA but have no proposal on how to
function without an intelligence agency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
36. She was lwilling to lay her life on the line...
unlike the Cuckoo-in-chief--the VEEP--and most of all the others in the Bush cabinet administration. And, they almost get her killed, and probably did get a lot of associates killed. Pricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slutticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Exactly.
I would never risk my life for my job.

I just don't have that in me. Compared to the chickenhawk cowards this woman really stands out for me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
41. We should send her flowers from Working Assets!
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 02:10 PM by in_cog_ni_to
We should let her and Joe know that we are here supporting her.

A DU activist cause?

on edit:http://www.flowersforchange.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC