Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Partial list of military bases to be closed/realigned during BRAC 2005

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:55 AM
Original message
Partial list of military bases to be closed/realigned during BRAC 2005
Naval Surface Warfare Center at Crane, Indiana, is among several installations recommended for closure and/or realignment by the military departments to Secretary Rumsfeld for the BRAC 2005 list. The list is not finalized, a little tinkering is to be expected, particularly when the Congressional delegations lobby the SecDef.

A realignment means that the installation is either gaining or losing activities.

Among the installations impacted by BRAC '05 are:

Fort Monmouth, Picatinny Arsenal, Carlisle Barracks, Fort McPherson, Fort Polk (to realign), Beale AFB, Nellis AFB (to realign), Seymour Johnson AFB (to realign), Shaw AFB, Ingleside NS, NAS Meridian, Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst, Pascagoula NS, Portsmouth Naval shipyard, Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, and many others (I don't feel like posting the entire list).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. link?
Just curious.

Are they really talking about shutting down Miramar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This hasn't been posted on the internet
Edited on Fri Sep-26-03 04:33 AM by IndianaGreen
It is still a working document. This is what the military chiefs are proposing to the Secretary of Defense.

If you are concerned about California, here are the California installations:

Sierra Army Depot, Beale AFB, Los Angeles AFB, Naval Postgraduate School, Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow (realignment), Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Marine Corps Mountain Warfare School, and Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego (realign or close).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well that takes care of San Diego
Shutting down Miramar and MCRD? Great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Chiefs tried to close Miramar during the last round
but the political pressure saved Miramar. Excess capacity is a common complaint about Miramar, although I suspect that some people have their eye on prime real estate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Some members of Congress suspect their districts will be impacted
To say that some members of Congress were leaked information about possible BRAC closings may be too strong a word, and bit premature, since this issue is still being worked out in the Pentagon.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: Harmony Allen

April 24, 2003

Cunningham Issues Statement Regarding BRAC 2005


WASHINGTON– Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-San Diego) was unable to attend this afternoon’s meeting with Mayor Murphy due to a long-standing commitment he has had to speak to the cadets at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, CO. He issued the following statement today:

“The analysis released today confirms what we in San Diego have known all along: that our major training bases are irreplaceable military assets. The base closure law specifically states that preservation of these critical air, land and sea ranges shall be a priority throughout the base closure process. San Diego’s value lies in the synergy created by these bases, the military industrial organizations that support them and the rich technology base here in the region. This unique network of competitive military assets makes San Diego better suited than any region in the nation to support the Department of Defense transformation of our military forces into the 21st Century.”

“Despite my opposition to another round of closures, that process is now law and we must prepare to ensure preservation of these unique military resources here in San Diego. It is up to the leaders of this community to ensure that the services not only appreciate the value of the unique synergies created in our region, but that they recognize its capacity to absorb related missions now performed at other bases.”

http://www.house.gov/cunningham/Press_Releases/BRAC_Statement24apr03.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Timeline for BRAC 2005 is posted on internet
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Timeline

Date: Dec. 31, 2003

Who: SecDef

Action: Publish in Fed. Reg. Initial Criteria but must take into account baseline criteria in Sec.10 USC 2913 (b-d)

Date: Jan. 30, 2004

Who: Public

Action: End public comment period.

Date: Feb. 4, 2004

Who: SecDef

Action: Submit to Congress the budget request outlining (1) the force structure based on probable threats to 2024, (2) end strength levels anticipated out to 2024 and (3) an inventory of required installations to support it CONUS/OCONUS.

<snip>

Date: May 16, 2005

Who: SecDef

Action: Publish in Fed. Reg. the bases proposed to commission for closure.

http://www.ysedc.org/BRAC/BRAC_Timeline.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC