Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now That The Shuttle ISn't Going To Explode Today...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:14 PM
Original message
Poll question: Now That The Shuttle ISn't Going To Explode Today...
what will bushco use to distract the media from Rovegate? (I know...I'm being cynical).

Vote below:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. wait, there's a white girl missing in Aruba?
when did that happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Jacobin Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I don't understand.
I understand the reporting on the OJ trial, Michael Jackson trial, and even Monica. They were about celebrities or powerful people.

I don't get the random "child is missing" as a national story. It seems you need a cute white girl go missing with middle class or wealthy media-savy parents and *bango* you have a national story. The missing hispanic kids with poor moms who don't speak english get one paragraph stories on page 3 of the metro section of the paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Really?
They get that much attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Horrible subject line...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You'd rather it read...
now that the shuttle exploded today...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 02:22 PM by libhill
call me a tinfoil hatter, but with all the doo doo Shrub seems to be getting into - let's just say I wouldn't want to be on that shuttle crew, and leave it at that -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I know, but the sad fact is that had they green-lighted this
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 02:22 PM by stopbush
launch it could well have been another disaster.

I have a very, VERY bad feeling about the safety of the shuttles. I've seen too many people from NASA on TV this week (some are former NASA) who feel uncomfortable about where the shuttles aren't in certain safety respects.

It feels like they are pushing this launch to keep the funding going. To have a back-up shuttle ready to go on a rescue mission if this one gets damaged - what happens if the rescue vehicle also gets damaged?

This is 30-yr-old technology that is being retrofitted. I think it's time they scuttled this program and started with something fresh. We should be beyond needing humans in space for these missions. That was fine to put a human face on the early space program, but now? I don't think so. The "can do" cheerleading is no replacement for a dependable technology. This does happen to be rocket science.

Maybe my subject line was a bit strong, but there's a big dose of reality in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No there isnt much reality to the subject line
Do you have any idea how many meetings and inspections took place before this launch? There was a new safety meeting every day leading up to this. This morning before launch an ice team inspected the shuttle for ice buildup, the fact that the launch was scrubbed because a backup of a backup of a contingency didn’t perform well is a good sign. Yesterday there was some concern because someone spotted a "blemish" in a protective blanket, after a full inspection it was found to be nothing.

On your second point, if the second shuttle fails then the Russian soyuz capsule is launched to mount another rescue mission.

You are right about 30 year old technology being retrofitted, most of the airplanes we fly on were built in the 60's and 70's, sure there are plane crashes but is doesn’t stop people from flying. But as opposed to airplanes the shuttle is being retrofitted by the best experts in the world and fitted with an amazing number of safety redundancies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yeah.
Edited on Wed Jul-13-05 04:02 PM by libhill
I'm impressed. Too bad they waited until after two disasters and the deaths of two teams of astronauts before getting so conscientious. They're a day late and a dollar short, in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryan_cats Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe that since they filled the tank already
I believe that since they filled the tank already, that's over $500,000 worth of fuel wasted. I don't know why they can't re-use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why not re-use?
Because the people that sell the new fuel have a vested interested in not reusing the old stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. No they pump it back out and reuse it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Why did the shuttle fail to launch and
what will it mean for the future of the space program? Let's go now to our correspondant, who is standing by at NASA headquarters with the latest..."

ad infinitum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ooo, bad title line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Chief Justice Rehnquist hospitalized
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. There's always the weather
It is hurricane season, after all.

ABNT20 KNHC 131515 2005194 1516
TWOAT
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1130 AM EDT WED JUL 13 2005
FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...
THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER IS ISSUING ADVISORIES ON TROPICAL
STORM EMILY...LOCATED ABOUT 165 MILES SOUTHEAST OF BARBADOS.
THE TROUGH OF LOW PRESSURE LOCATED ABOUT 650 MILES WEST OF THE CAPE
VERDE ISLANDS HAS NOT BECOME ANY BETTER ORGANIZED THIS MORNING.
HOWEVER...THIS SYSTEM HAS THE POTENTIAL TO DEVELOP INTO A TROPICAL
DEPRESSION AS IT MOVES WESTWARD TOWARD WARMER WATERS OVER THE NEXT
DAY OR TWO.
ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL STORM FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED THROUGH
THURSDAY.
FORECASTER FRANKLIN
$$
wxtlist.k: done

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC