Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans are saying that Wilson lied...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:22 AM
Original message
Republicans are saying that Wilson lied...
what are they talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. nothing really....
they are trying to say that Wilson lied about saying he was sent by Cheney's office to Niger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. did he? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. no he said that the CIA sent him by request of Cheney's office
What happened was, Cheney's office told the CIA that they wanted somebody to look into Uranium story in Niger. The CIA sent Joe Wilson to do the job, he did it, came back and made his report to the CIA, who then, as far as we know, made the report to Cheney's office.

When Wilson first said that he was sent out to do an investigation that the VP's office wanted, Cheney basically said:"Joe who? I never met him. I never sent him anywhere or got any report from him."

What they are trying to do is play a child's game. Like people are dumb enough to believe that. They are trying to spin it off the real issue and make Wilson look like a liar because he proved them wrong on the Niger story. Dick Cheney told the CIA to send somebody, so they sent Wilson. He knows damn well, Wilson isn't saying he was personally sent by Cheney, but they want people to think that. They also are trying to say that Wilson only got the job because his wife got it for him. That has nothing to do with anything, but these guys use these little tactics all the time to deflect the real issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. So therefore his wife "deserved" having her career ruined and
her intelligence operation outed. Sounds logical to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. thats what i asked them too and then i get the "she was a pencil pusher"
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Whew! What a relief! That makes a big difference.
If she was only a "pencil-pusher" that makes her "fair game". In that case, it's perfectly OK to have her career ruined and her intelligence operation outed. Serves Joe Wilson right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Don't forget "pencil pushers have authority to send
whomever they want to investigate WMD's" right? Yep, that's right. uh huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. If she was a pencil pusher, the CIA wouldn't have confirmed that she
worked undercover and wouldn't have insisted on the investigation.

Also, the law covers anyone who has worked undercover within a 5 year timespan of the outing I believe. Even, assuming arguendo, if she was a "pencil pusher" at the time the leak occurred, if she had in fact worked undercover within the 5 years prior to that date, the leak would still be a prosecutable felony offense. The sources from whom she gathered information would still be endangered, and many sources of information for the US intelligence community are now exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. A pencil pusher that was a covert agent?
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 08:26 AM by LiberalFighter
:rofl: They must be on dope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Now this sounds like a tactic a 6 year old would think up
I hurt someone, but he deserved it.

I'm starting to think that the GOP's core is a bunch of white men who have the social judgement and emotional maturity of 6 year olds with guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. they are doing what they do best
obfuscate and deflect from the real liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. I believe TalkingPointsMemo.com goes over this
and how it's yet another attempt by the Repukes to attack the messenger, not the message.

Here you go:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_07_10.php#006082
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. And the same assholes out his wife
:eyes: yeah, they hit the target. :freak:

Frankly, I don't give a damn that he lied. He could be the biggest bush ass kisser this side of the Atlantic it still does not give ANYONE the right to out a CIA operative working undercover. We're in a damn war for crying out loud!

It's a fucking crime. Period. Spin that, repukes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. There is no reason to repeat this nonsense.
Don't feed into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. and now they are saying there is no evidence that rove knew she was ...
undercover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. and since he didnt know it was ok for him to talk about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. thats no excuse
- She was undercover

- He should have made sure she wasnt undercover.

- He knew enough about her to tell Cooper that she sent her husband to Niger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernleftylady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. but non covert agents go on trips too... lol i tried to say the same thing
you just did and thats the responce i got.. its killing me i swear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. he should have made sure it was safe to talk about her
He at the very least was reckless about the way he did it. Whos name is he going to blurt out next???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. they claim Wilson says Cheney sent him
But that NEVER happened.

Ask them where exactly he said that and they will go off scratching their heads.

What really happened is that Cheney asked the CIA to investigate the Niger/uranium issue and the CIA sent Wilson to Niger by themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. The problem is that their tactics often work
and I am not hearing anyone stand up for Wilson. The Dems need to counter this. They need to quote the exact words used and not let Mehlman and the talking points take control of the dialogue.

Smearing is the game plan and while they are accusing the Dems of smearing Rove, they are running a parallel campaign of smearing Wilson. Dems have to step up and stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
20. Then Why Did The White House Retract The 16 Words?
They retracted the 16 words because Wilson told the truth .... no other reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC