Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When are Dems going to make the Wilson-Yellowcake-Plame-DSM connection!?!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:30 PM
Original message
When are Dems going to make the Wilson-Yellowcake-Plame-DSM connection!?!?
Tie it all up in the nice neat little package that it is!

I want to hear this from a prominent senator:

As special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald continues to pursue Karl Rove and others who blew the cover of Valerie Plame it is important to consider how this action relates to this assertion in the Downing Street Memos regarding Bush's justification for war in Iraq: "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

The outing of Plame was used in an attempt by the Bush administration to discredit her husband Joseph Wilson, who had criticized the administration's assertion that Saddam Hussein had attempted to purchase yellow cake uranium in Niger. In the end even the Bush administration has admitted that the Niger documents turned out to be phony.

Wilson's criticism of the administration's claims that Saddam Hussein sought uranium in Niger, and the subsequent outing of Plame by the White House, corroborate the Downing Street Memos' characterization that the facts and intelligence were being "fixed" to support a predetermined policy for war. Furthermore, it is clear that the White House will stop at nothing when it comes to silencing its critics, not even jeopardizing national security by compromising a CIA working to prevent the spread of WMD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why aren't they screaming about it to the media?????? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. because it looks partisan
much better to sit back and let Fitzgerald do it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. I suspect they are waiting for indictments.
People at DU are really ahead of the curve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. tie in
Don't forget to tie in Cheney and Bolton as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. it should be the next letter campaign
email or snail mail or call your congressmen/women and make the connection for them, tell them to bring it to the attention of the prosecutor and call for an investigation into the administration for DSM and the Rove connection corroborating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. my post is basically my last LTTE to Newsday and the NYTimes
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 01:57 PM by tk2kewl
the ones I sent were ever so slightly softer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why make a connection?
Personally, I can understand how important this COULD be, but it would require the media to act in a certain, predefined manner. They would have to contradict the current WH propaganda, and they just will not do this...

But think for a moment:

The British Yellowcake conclusion was proven to be false by Wilson.

Wouldn't the RW just take this one fact and by extension dishonestly reassert the invalidity of the DSM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I dont think I am following you...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Send them this editorial ...
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 01:46 PM by TahitiNut
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=4097268

Send it out to your entire mailing list.
Print out multiple copies.
Post it.
Hand it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC