Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freeper is saying Wilson admitted Plame was not undercover on CNN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:28 PM
Original message
Freeper is saying Wilson admitted Plame was not undercover on CNN
I am sure the dullard who wrote this misunderstood something Wilson said to Wolf Blitzer and is now getting everyone on FR all excited about nothing. They are foaming at the mouth over their over this.

See here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1443066/posts

What a bunch of boobs! :dunce:

Anyone see the interview who can shed light on this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. he did say she wasn't "at the time"
but when Wolf asked if she was before, he said that he couldn't talk about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I think he
corrected himself a few minutes later, and made clear she wasn't when the magazine article Wolf asked about came out. She was at the time of Novak's article; the infamous Joe Klein article in TIME noted she was active on an investigation regarding the possible sale of WMD components when Novak's article was published.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you really think that who ever is posting that actually paid any
attention to what Mr. Wilson has said. And they don't care to lie the story to death it is sad to be so disigenous and then act like it's the fault of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Joe Wilson said that..
yeah, after she was outed by Novak that she was no longer covert. Duh! After that he and his wife did the Vanity Fair story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wilson did say she was not working an undercover job at the time.
The difference, as I heard from a CIA agent who was just on Ed Schultz's show is, that NOC agents many times complete one assignment and work a desk job (that is not an under cover task) until they get their next assignment, they are however still considered NOC agents and protected as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. What's NOC mean?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Non-Official Cover
No diplomatic passport/immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. The most important thing to keep in mind in all this
is that the CIA - not Wilson, not the Democrats - the frickin' CIA initiated this probe because THEY said it met the specs for naming a covert operative.

Freepers and the RW media are trying desperately to avoid talking about that, for obvious reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bejammin075 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. guess 2+ year investigation is for nothing
Oh yeah, they've been investigating this for 2+ years, and they forgot to check if Plame was actually considered undercover or not...that's the ticket!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. *lol*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoJoWorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. NO, what Wilson said was
that she was NOT undercover at the time of an article that showed a pic of Joe and Val in a car, which was AFTER SHE WAS OUTED. He said she was no longer undercover the DAY THAT NOVAK OUTED HER!! GEEZ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Don't confuse freeps with facts.........
they're as divorced from reality as their president is (hey, he's not MY president). Their pea sized brains have been spinning out of control for days now, they have no idea which way is up or down, what day it is.....they're on sensory overload. People are actually trying to use FACTS to make a case against Rove. There is no room for facts or the truth in the freeper world.
These guys are a riot :rofl: their brains are going to explode soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. That's exactly
what he said, very clearly. That at the time of the article with her picture, she was no longer undercover. Her cover was blown the day the Novak article appeared ~

When asked if she was working for the CIA again, and if she was undercover now, Joe Wilson said he could not discuss that.

Freepers have a collective and selectivie comprehension mechanism. Their ears are trained to hear only what supports the way they want the world to be! They jump on key words that match words they heard from Rush or Savage/Weiner et al, and exclude everything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. "At the time of the article"
That's what I remember him saying. But I thought he meant the Vanity Fair article which came out 6 months after Novak's article. I didn't think he was referring to Novak's article. But I was also sitting here absorbed in a post on DU so I could have heard him wrong.

He did refuse to say when she had last been a covert agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. I think it came in response to a question...
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 05:43 PM by joemurphy
from Wolf Blitzer asking how Wilson would respond to Republican allegations that he had been appearing publicly with his wife and that they'd been photographed together by Vanity Fair in Tribeca -- implying that Wilson was enjoying the attention (and that his wife wasn't really concerned about her anonymity).

Wilson said that his was no longer clandestine when the Vanity Fair picture of them together was taken and that it was long after the Novak article outing her had run.

CNN ran the picture from Vanity Fair. It had Plame's wife wearing a scarf and large black sunglasses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. When all else fails - make shit up!
Ain't that right you lurking freeper fucktards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. It was quite the opposite
Wolf asked if it was true that Mrs. Wilson was not undercover at the time of the Novak article and Wilson replied he could not talk about it and made the point that his wife was NO LONGER undercover since the Novak article.

Wolf then went on spewing right wing talking points re his making money writing a book and the article in Vanity Fair which took place AFTER Novak/Rove outed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. What a bunch of fucking group-think sheep!!!!
EVERY POST ON THEIR thinks it's real and no one is trying to check it out or be a devils advocate. They are all walking in lock step! WOW!

They are making fools out of themselves!!! I am ROTFL!!!

:dunce: :dunce: :dunce: :dunce: :freak: :freak: :freak:

rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

You almost never see that here on DU! We rip each other to shreds on almost every topic even when it's great news for us. Their is always someone here on DU telling people not to get too excited or that everyone else is full of shit.:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Heh, if that ain't the truth...
There are maybe a handful of things that all DUers agree on (Bush sucks, for example). Otherwise no matter what the topic, we're weighing in from different sides all the time. Any hint of dissent at FR is met with immediate banishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. This reply is pretty disgusting.........
I had a hunch she wasn't a covert agent.
Ever since this thing surfaced, there was constant hemming and hahing about whether she was or wasn't.
Frankly, I'd be shocked if she ever was undercover. Odds are she was part of the CIA affirmative action hiring campaign.
And has been nothing more than a paper-shuffler.



21 posted on 07/14/2005 3:10:07 PM PDT by CharlieChan
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

Just when I think these asswipes can't possibly set the bar any lower, they pull something like this out of their asses and surprise me. What a bunch of low-life scum. The guy that wrote this probably cleans toilets for a living, a real Bob Boudelang type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Uh....don't tell me....
tell the freeper who wrote this. These aren't MY words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Oh I know!
I was just saying! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. These people...
...aren't capable of having more than one thought at a time. They'll tell you that it was Plame who sent her husband to Africa. Which would mean that a person who works in the Affirmative Action hiring campaign who is a paper-shuffler has the authority to send an ambassador to Africa.

They demean her job to make the "outing" less important. Then promote her, to make her responsible for his trip.

I asked a freeper-type at yahoo..."Did she have a trivial desk jockey job...or an important, powerful job?" He told me to go F*** myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. *rotfl*
That was very mean of you. That's way too much logic for a freeper brain to absorb!!

I thought freepers were saying this was a non-story last week, btw!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. She wasn't when the Vanity Fair article was written. He was responding
to a question about claims that he is using the controversy for his own gain. He said his wife wasn't a clandestine officer at the time of the Vanity Fair article.

He said he doesn't have to be slimed and be quiet and take it.

I wrote a quick summary of the interview on another thread.

Here it is:

He did great. I'm glad Wolf let him respond to the specific list of smears the GOP has put out as talking points.

For the cube rats, Wolf said he had a new Talking Points memo put out by the RNC (I can't remember the exact name) that is the top 10 "lies" by Joe Wilson. Here are some of the top 10 with Wilson's response.

1. Dick Cheney asked Wilson to go - Joe Wilson responded that he was briefed that the VP had asked about the Niger claims to the CIA and in response the CIA decided to send someone to check it out. That is what JW has always said.

2. Valerie Wilson suggested her husband for the job - he denied it and said the Senate Intelligence Committee staff didn't call the CIA and ask them so their report was incomplete.

They went to a commercial and when they came back Wolf just asked questions.

The Rove frog marched out of the WH comment by JW - Wilson said his wife told him he was a little over the top on that one. He said he knew Rove was pushing the story because Chris Matthews called him after he got off the phone with Rove and told JW that JW's "wife is fair game".

Wilson said he doesn't know if Rove committed a crime. Fitzgerald will determine that.

Wolf asked him to respond to claims that he is a political hack - He said he reserves the right to participate in our Democracy just like all other citizens. He was an ambassador under Poppy Bush. He went on the trip to Niger at the request of the Government. He read a letter he received from Poppy Bush that was written 8 months after his trip to Niger and 8 months before his wife was outed.

Wolf asked him to respond to claims that he is using the controversy for his own gain. He said his wife was not a clandestine officer at the time of the Vanity Fair article. He doesn't have to just sit back and be slimed and be quiet and take it.

Wilson said the Special Counsel will have the last word.

Wolf asked him if he would apologize to Rove if Rove isn't indicted. Wilson said there were two things that happened that we know were wrong. One was the sixteen words in the State of the Union that were wrong. The other was his wife's identity being compromised. Wilson said that he isn't responsible for either of those two things and he won't apologize.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4102500#4102738
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. He was great
He never hesitated over a single question.

You only left out one thing. When Wolf asked him if would apologize to Rove if he is not indicted, he answered as you said, but he also said that regardless of indictments, what Rove did was an egregious abuse of power!

Wilson also told Worl Blitzer that Rove had called a reporter and told him that his wife, Valerie, was 'fair game'. Wolf asked if he could reveal the name of the reporter. Wilson said 'yes, it was Chris Matthews who called' and told him that.

I don't know how anyone could have watched the interview and come away thinking his wife was not undercover. Except a freeper, I suppose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I knew I missed something in the answer about the apology but I
didn't know exactly what so I just put what I heard.

That is the problem with trying to write or type what someone is saying. If you focus on writing sometimes you miss something.

I did include the part about Tweety. I was glad he was able to get that into the interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. He said she was not undercover at the TIME OF THE VANITY FAIR ARTICLE.
He could not comment on the time before that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. David Gregory, of MSNBC, just confirmed she *was* undercover.
So that freeper is an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nittygritty Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bruce Sanford using the same talking point on Hardball now-
Plame's position was not "undercover"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. A freeper told me that the US border was completely surrounded by water
3 weeks ago, that the US did not border on any other countries, just oceans. (True story)

Freepers will believe just about anything. Their entire belief system is based on illusion, and they do not have the educational background, common sense, or innate intellectual capacity to perceive the difference between fact and fiction.

And that, simply, is why they are Bu*h supporting republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Did you ask when Canada became part of the US?
or Mexico??? Geesh, buy that person a cheap map!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. No, but I did learn that Alan Jackson owns Ford Motor Company!
Needless to say, I was amazed at that little known "fact".;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moxygirl Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. Christ is it just me or are freepers
just too goddamn stupid for their own good. I've tried about six times to read that horrible site and every time I go running for an overdose of Tylenol. What gives with these retards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Check out my post on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC