thecrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:17 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 06:20 PM by thecrow
Denies security clearance to any federal employee who discloses the identitiy of any undercover agent
McCain Objects on the basis of not seeing the amendment!
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
Tommymac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message |
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
3. That's Good...Look At What We've Got On Record Now |
|
Anyone who voted against Reid's ammendment now risks being framed as abeting terror and the exposing of a CIA agent. Reid is crafty and I think this vote will reap some nice dividends later.
If this scandal does blow into one of Watergate proportions, this vote will show any and all Repugnicans as putting party ahead of country. How could he lose?
Great work, Harry. The more I see this man work, the more I like him.
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Just called Reid's office. |
|
Expressing my displeasure that the Reid Amendment did not pass and congratulating him on a brilliant strategic move.
|
Tommymac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. Me too! Thanks for the idea! |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 06:40 PM by Tommymac
I just left a message of support and emphasized the silver lining for 2006 election fodder... Reid, Harry- (D - NV) 528 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510 (202) 224-3542 http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?Name=Reid
|
tjdee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Republicans support treason? What? |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Wow. Repukes WEAK ON NATIONAL SECURITY! |
|
losers. They'll pay for that vote.
|
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Over the top. Looks vindictive, and fell flat on its face. Not helpful to the investigation, not helpful politically.
|
GreenPartyVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Do we have a roll call vote to prove who is soft on treason? |
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Republicans: WEAK ON NATIONAL SECURITY |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message |
10. thats how the democrats are treated in the house-no lookee! |
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Why do Republicans hate America ? |
|
:grr:
brillant move by Reid he hasn't let me down yet .
|
understandinglife
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-14-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Republicans Strong on Treason; Weak on National Security. OTR |
|
On The Record. Peace. www.missionnotaccomplished.us - How ever long it takes, the day must come when tens of millions of caring individuals peacefully but persistently defy the dictator, deny the corporatists their cash flow, and halt the evil being done in Iraq and in all the other places the Bu$h neoconster regime is destroying civilization and the environment in the name of "America."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |