Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush admin may be responsible for botching effort to thwart London bombing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:48 PM
Original message
Bush admin may be responsible for botching effort to thwart London bombing
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 11:07 PM by StefanX
THIS IS A MAJOR STORY!!! KIND OF LONG, BUT IN A NUTSHELL:
BUSH ADMIN SCREWUPS MAY HAVE ENABLED THE LONDON BOMBINGS!

Remember that suspicious terror alert around the time of the Dem convention last year, which the Bush Admin tried to justify by releasing "too much information" about a laptop Pakistani authorities had captured in Lahore belonging to an alleged Al Qaida leader who then turned mole for the US?

Turns out, by releasing too much info about the mole, the Bush admin may have blown the mole's cover... and a bunch of Al Qaida types got away... who may have ended up being involved with the London bombing.

So here we have a situation where the Bush admin blew an asset's cover (for political purposes), and an attack may have resulted. (Anyone seeing a pattern here yet?)

Only seeing this on Americablog.org so far. Can anyone corroborate? If this is true, this is absolutely horrifying and disgusting. We need a government that protects us, not a government that endangers us.

Bush admin may be responsible for botching effort to thwart London bombing
by John in DC - 7/14/2005 08:09:00 PM

ABC News just reported that the British authorities say they have evidence that the London attacks last week were an operation planned by Al Qaeda for the last two years. This was an operation the Brits thought they caught and stopped in time, but they were wrong. The piece of the puzzle ABC missed is that this is an operation the Bush administration helped botch last year.

i.e., last year Bush botched the effort to thwart the London subway attacks.

1. The London bombers, per ABC, are connected to an Al Qaeda plot planned two years ago in Lahore, Pakistan.

2. Pakistani authorities recovered the laptop of a captured Al Qaeda leader, Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan, on July 13, 2004. On that laptop, they found plans for a coordinated series of attacks on the London subway. According to an expert interviewed by ABC, "there is absolutely no doubt that Khan was part of a worldwide Al Qaeda operation, not just in the United States but also in Great Britain and throughout the west."

Also important, but not reported by ABC this evening, after his arrest Khan started working for our side - sending emails to his other Al Qaeda buddies, working as our mole.

3. ABC reports that names in Khan's computer matched a suspected cell of British citizens of Pakistani decent, many of who lived near the town of Luton, England - Luton is the same town where, not coincidentally, last week's London bombing terrorists began their day. According to ABC, authorities thought they had stopped the subway plot with the arrest of more than a dozen people last year associated with Khan. Obviously, they hadn't.

4. Those arrests were the arrests that the Bush administration botched by announcing a heightened security alert the week of the Democratic Convention. The alert was raised because of information found on Khan's computer (this is in the public record already, see below). In its effort to either prove that the alert was serious, or to try and scare people during the Dem Convention, the administration gave the press too much information about WHY they raised the alert. This put the media on the trail of Khan - they found him, and they published his name.

Because the US let the cat out of the bag, the media got a hold of Khan's name and published the fact that he had been captured - his Al Qaeda contacts thus found out their "buddy" was actually a mole, and they fled. Our sole source inside Al Qaeda was destroyed. As a result, the Brits had to have a high speed chase to catch some of Khan's Al Qaeda associates as they fled, and, according to press reports, the Brits and Pakistanis both fear that some slipped away.

Again, these were guys connected to the plot to blow up the London subway last week. Some may have escaped because of Bush administration negligence involving a leak.


via Atrios

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think "botched" is the right word
Now that we've had three of these incidents, I think "sabotaged" is better. Botched implies it was an accident. It looks more like a deliberate pattern, to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think this needs to be media blasted!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ew, that f_cking crazy-ass twit.
This is big news. Aiding and abetting criminals, compromising the nation's security and creating a false scenario.

I'm waiting to hear the thud when he goes down for all this bullcrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:13 PM
Original message
Oh My , More Treason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh My , More Treason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does anyone have the email addresses for the London newspapers?
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 11:18 PM by StefanX
I think this needs to get out quick. Guardian, Times UK - anyone have the email addresses handy?

US media might be too slow or timid to put 2 and 2 together here - UK papers wouldn't be afraid and, um... I think they'd be quite interested in this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC