jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 08:47 AM
Original message |
All these stories about ROVE LEARNED FROM JOUNALIST come from one source |
|
Someone in the "legal" profession who whould have access to what Rove said...
Namely, Rove's Lawyer...
Why do we trust what is being spewed here?
Do you really think that someone in that administration had to learn CLASSIFIED material from a reporter?!
|
kikiek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Of course! It is just a release of what Rove's testimony was to the GJ. |
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yep, don't let them spin you silly! |
kikiek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I think Rove has sunk his ship finally. They're desperate. |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Well we all know that isn't the point. This is the fine grey line they |
|
are going to dance on to get the boy off.
I knew something like this would happen. :cry: I knew doing the happy dance too early would break my heart. :cry:
|
Walt Starr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message |
5. And reporters wil be subopoenaed |
|
and Luskin will be disbarred and indicted for conspiracy.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. Luskin won't be disbarred. He's only repeating what his client said. |
|
Listen carefully to every word Luskin says. Attorney's are good at this. ie: "Rove NEVER released Joe Wilson's wife's name." Well, even the emails that have been released have said in the converdation with Cooper, Rove NEVER DID say Valerie Plame, he said Jow Wilson's wife! So strictly speaking, what Luskin said concurrs with the email. Lufkin states his client is NOT a target of this investigation. That's also apparently true. Rove is not a target...yet! He's not a witness either. He's a subject, that can be converted to a target based upon testimony from others.
I think you're right on the possible conspiracy charges, and that involves co-conspirators too. I think there is also a strong case to be made for purgury, obstruction, and several other charges to come down the road.
This is definately a "Stay tuned" story!
|
Walt Starr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. I was responding to the OP |
|
where Luskin is the anonymous leak about Rove's testimony.
If that's true and reporters testify to it, he's sunk and criminally liable.
|
ClintonTyree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message |
6. And since when has the media........ |
|
started printing stories backed by only one source, especially after all the bullshit the Slugs have been pulling with leaked stories and their sources? This nebulous "source" of theirs must be someone very high on the totem pole. This smells to high hell.
|
Guckert
(946 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message |
7. I heard from a friend of a friends brothers uncle that Rove heard it from |
|
...................... Nice work GOP.
|
Last Lemming
(806 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Rove's fifteenth version of what actually happened
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. 15th, 16th, He will keep coming out with them until the public is so |
|
confused they don't know what happened
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
10. An 'annonymous' source. Total bullshit. But spin don't matter here. |
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Kicking and nominating EOM |
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
this just keeps coming up
|
Garbo 2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message |
15. It's called "laundering" information, leaks. n/t |
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Sounds like rove needs to hire a plumber(s)! |
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. who else to perpetuate the RW Spin than an "annon" Rove Laywer |
|
Looks "official" because of all the leaks that have been true recently and makes the leaker look un-biased.
He is smart, i'll give him that, but not smart enough to weasle out of this one...
|
Garbo 2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. The amazing thing is, knowing Lushkin has a bias and has spun himself |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 01:18 PM by Garbo 2004
silly to the press with info that was, um, not strictly accurate, and the press still takes the info he gives them and runs with it. Stenography again.
Fool 'em once and if you're associated with the Administration clearly you can keep fooling them again and again....
But I've no doubt the Plame info was laundered via the press so that certain folks could claim "plausible deniability" and also create the atmosphere that "everyone in Washington knew about Plame." It's the old game of telephone in a way.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |