cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 11:53 AM
Original message |
Will the Supreme Court be asked to toss out Roe v. Wade? |
|
Maybe, maybe not, depending on who replaces O'Connor...
But they also might be asked to "toss out" Rove and Wade (Karl and MZM's Mitchell)...
Will they toss them out too? :)
|
DanCa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Will violence break out if roe is over turned? |
|
I have been wondering about this for awhile now.
|
enki23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. no. but it may if it isn't. |
leveymg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
2. The SCOTUS nomination(S) may be put on hold. |
|
If I were Reid, I'd start pushing that position real hard if any indictments are handed down.
Would they let Nixon appoint someone to the High Court during Watergate? Hell, no! And, this is worse!
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
4. That Is Not How The Court Works |
|
Someone just doesn't go up to the Court and knock on the door to ask if they would mind overturning a law, now that the makeup of the court has changed.
A case has to be in the system. The case has to have received a judgement in a lower court. The point in question must be one the court is willing to address (just because a particular case gets sent up doesn't mean it will be considered).
So don't worry too much about Roe anytime soon.
|
wuushew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Are the cases chosen by majority vote or unanimous decision? |
|
If one uber liberal or conservative could act as a road block would that not force the court to consider truly non-partisan issues?
|
mtnester
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Not if you believe the latest WSJ/NBS poll.. |
|
<snip> ....However, 50 percent think Bush would be making a mistake if his choice changes the court’s balance on Roe v. Wade." Link if you like: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8561443/
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Acck.... I guess the joke wasn't clear enough about Rove and Wade! |
|
There might be just as much of a chance of either of them (or perhaps both if their conspiracies merge) coming before the Supremes soon...
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It's "asked" all the time. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message |