Only answer to Rs claim Wilson lied - Testify how you know UNDER OATH

[blm]

to Fitzgerald. I'm sure he must need such crucial evidence.

Surely they wouldn't object to testifying about all their evidence against Wilson UNDER OATH.

[fob]

1. Nice.

I like it, straight to the point and there's no way in hell they would agree to it.

[blm]

5. Heh...I just want to watch their mouths drop when it's suggested to them.

.

[skids]

2. How about in general:

"Don't even bother listening to a Republican unless they are under oath."

:evilgrin:

[blm]

3. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.......

thanks for the laugh

[GreenPartyVoter]

4. AH! "Rove is a great guy. A whistle blower!" *whipping out stack of Bibles

Care to state that again for the record?

[KharmaTrain]

6. Someone Should Find A Civil Suit In This Matter

Where's Larry "The Rat" Klayman...the champion of government busting when we need him. LOL.

Seriously, I'd love to see a third party that would launch a civil suit that would compell, just like Paula Jones, all these goons to testify under oath about what they knew. If the government can't do it, there are other ways it can be done. I'd gladly donate to such a suit.

[blm]

9. I think you're right. Citizens are harmed when WMD specialists are forced

out in the open and their investigations compromised. Citizens PAID for those operations. Citizens may be seriously harmed by the fallout. Citizens were betrayed by one of their own employees who collects a paycheck funded by citizen taxpayers.

[Just Me]

7. Well, they are making themselves out as having info relating to,...

,...the outing. That makes them a witness. If I were the prosecutor, at the very least I'd demand sworn statements from each and every one of them.

[blm]

8. Exactly. I wanna see 1 newsie ask King, Roberts, Bond, Mehlman to testify

about their evidence that Wilson lied to Fitzgerald.

If they were so concerned that the truth be heard, why aren't they sharing it with the prosecutor in the case UNDER OATH?