Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leaking incident should mean the end of Rove.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 06:00 PM
Original message
Leaking incident should mean the end of Rove.....
...See what readers in Milwaukee think of what KKKarl Rove did and what consequences he should get.


<snip>
The Morning Mail
From Journal Sentinel readers
Last Updated: July 16, 2005

KARL ROVE
Leaking incident should mean the end of Rove
In response to the July 13 editorial "Should this leak sink Rove?" the obvious answer is "yes."

Advertisement

Rove and his attorney may claim plausible deniability by saying he didn't actually divulge Valerie Plame's name, but the Intelligence Protection Act states that the disclosure of "any information identifying (a) covert agent" is illegal. Rove may also attempt to dodge culpability by claiming he didn't know Plame was an agent. However, Time reporter Matt Cooper's e-mail says Rove was speaking on "double super secret background." Why would Rove insist on such a level of confidentiality unless he knew what he was divulging was sensitive information?

All of the evidence points to Rove as a source of the leak. President Bush has previously pledged that he would fire anyone in his administration who was involved in the leak. There are ample grounds for firing Rove, not the least of which is that his recklessness with intelligence information is detrimental to national security. Yet the latest word out of the White House is that Bush has every confidence in Rove.

The question now becomes: "Is Bush a man of his word or not?"

Lynda R. Prout
Milwaukee

<more>
<link> http://www.jsonline.com/news/editorials/jul05/341288.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. There it is
Is Bush a man of his word or not - I know the answer and I suspect most of you do to- but it will be interesting to get confirmation.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Answer, not! But Pappy Bush may step in and take shrub to the
...woodshed for a good thrashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Is Bush a man of his word or not?" which word? The one when he was
campaigning or the one when he was Selected? OR the one when he was at a safe Town Hall Event? He has been on every side of every issuer of Merit and has NEVER been Wrong.

You have to remember the pResident contradicts himself in side the same speech. The SheepL have such a short attention span it does not matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. More people than Rove was involved in this
'sweet' scandal. The 'big guns' must have had an inkling of what was going on, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. There's more solid grounds -- i.e. besides IIPA -- to prosecute "TB"...See
Edited on Sat Jul-16-05 06:13 PM by tiptoe
TB leak "monumental" compared to leak-conviction precedent (not IIPA)

(IIPA = "Intelligence Identities And Protection Act")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC