Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove was required by law to CONFIRM any info was declassified

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:23 AM
Original message
Rove was required by law to CONFIRM any info was declassified
before further disseminating the info.

This potentially undermines his "I heard it from the media" defense.

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/07/16/rove-agreement/

<snip>

Question 19: If information that a signer of the SF 312 knows to have been classified appears in a public source, for example, in a newspaper article, may the signer assume that the information has been declassified and disseminate it elsewhere?

Answer: No. Information remains classified until it has been officially declassified. Its disclosure in a public source does not declassify the information. Of course, merely quoting the public source in the abstract is not a second unauthorized disclosure. However, before disseminating the information elsewhere or confirming the accuracy of what appears in the public source, the signer of the SF 312 must confirm through an authorized official that the information has, in fact, been declassified. If it has not, further dissemination of the information or confirmation of its accuracy is also an unauthorized disclosure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. indeed it does
And the enforcers of secrecy are a very serious bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatelseisnew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. keep this kicked ya'll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Everyone has focused on just the one statute, but John Dean
said, there are lots of statutes that Rove could be found in violation of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Dean is experienced and a good lawyer as well . . . nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Here's the link to Dean's article
Here's the link to Dean's article:

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20050715.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. so you're saying he should've notified CIA that Plame Had Been Uncovered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. even Novak checked with the CIA
he was under not under the same legal obligation that Rove was, but he checked with the CIA before publishing his column.

Of course, Novak IGNORED the CIA's telling him not to publish the info, but at least he checked with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
many a good man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Penalty
From the comments section on the same site:

U.S. Code as of: 01/06/03
Section 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense
against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any
agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of
such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy,
each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
five years, or both.
If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object
of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such
conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for
such misdemeanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC