Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Advance snippets of Cooper's article in tomorrow's Time....VERY Interestin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:39 AM
Original message
Advance snippets of Cooper's article in tomorrow's Time....VERY Interestin
http://americblog.org

TIME: "What I told the Grand Jury" by Matt Cooper
by John in DC - 7/17/2005 10:49:00 AM

Snippets of the article in tomorrow's TIME:

Rove went on to say that Wilson had not been sent to Niger by the director of the CIA and, I believe from my subsequent e-mails--although it's not in my notes--that Rove added that Dick Cheney didn't send him either. Indeed, the next day the Vice President's chief of staff, I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby, told me Cheney had not been responsible for Wilson's mission....

As for Wilson's wife, I told the grand jury I was certain that Rove never used her name and that, indeed, I did not learn her name until the following week, when I either saw it in Robert Novak's column or Googled her, I can't recall which. Rove did, however, clearly indicate that she worked at the "agency"--by that, I told the grand jury, I inferred that he obviously meant the CIA and not, say, the Environmental Protection Agency. Rove added that she worked on "WMD" (the abbreviation for weapons of mass destruction) issues and that she was responsible for sending Wilson. This was the first time I had heard anything about Wilson's wife.

Rove never once indicated to me that she had any kind of covert status. I told the grand jury something else about my conversation with Rove. Although it's not reflected in my notes or subsequent e-mails, I have a distinct memory of Rove ending the call by saying, "I've already said too much." This could have meant he was worried about being indiscreet, or it could have meant he was late for a meeting or something else. I don't know, but that sign-off has been in my memory for two years.

This was actually my second testimony for the special prosecutor. In August 2004, I gave limited testimony about my conversations with Scooter Libby.... On background, I asked Libby if he had heard anything about Wilson's wife sending her husband to Niger. Libby replied, "Yeah, I've heard that too," or words to that effect. Like Rove, Libby never used Valerie Plame's name or indicated that her status was covert, and he never told me that he had heard about Plame from other reporters, as some press accounts have indicated. Did Fitzgerald's questions give me a sense of where the investigation is heading? Perhaps. He asked me several different! ways if Rove indicated how he had heard that Plame worked at the CIA. (He did not, I told the grand jury.) Maybe Fitzgerald is interested in whether Rove knew her CIA ties through a person or through a document.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ken Mehlman
I saw some of these quoted this morning on Meet the Press.

Mr. Mehlman could not get off his two track refrain.
a) Wilson was wrong on every point and lies through his teeth
b) Karl rove is an honorable man.

The former press secretary for President Clinton showed great restraint in not calling him what he was.

I never thought that Mr. Rove would be touched by anything. But, perhaps, the same hubris and conceit that once fatally infected Mr. Gingrich apparently is communicable and transmittable among others in the political "muddy" trenches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sure would be nice to have a tape of Cooper calling the WH
after his GJ testimony groveling, "Did I do good, huh?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. you know that they exist - would this WH allow for anything else?
Never in the almost 5 decades of life have I ever seen any administration so on message at all times. YOu do that by insuring the loyalty of your top people (Paul O'Neill was too smart and honest, and how dare he talk economics and Africa) AND you do that by fear and enforcement.
Of course this White House has tapes. I wonder if our friendly independent counsel has requested them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If there are subpoenaed tapes, you can bet they will be
"Rosemary Woods-ed"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. My thinking, too.
Don't forget about Bush/Cheney putting their grubby fingers all over the CIA to make sure they walk the chalk line.

I'm anxious to see how the root of Fitzgerald's investigation branches out - I sure hope a lot of the crimes are connected to this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC