Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Were the Greens just sowing seeds in 2000?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:40 PM
Original message
Were the Greens just sowing seeds in 2000?
In light of recent "purist bashing" I am wondering whether the Democratic party will be able to hold together. Is it possible that the Greens could reap a bountiful harvest by convincing the left wing of the party that its goals are being ignored?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. the left wing of the party already knows its goals are being ignored
the left wing of the party also knows the goals of working families, minorities, unions, etc. are being ignored by the dem. party in favor of big business. hence the increasing popularity of a progressive third party alternative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hmm. I'd agree with that, if it were true.
Ignored is a pretty strong word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hear hear KG!!
The Green party isn't sowing seeds, or deliberately stirring shit. They are simply picking up new members who have been left behind by the Dems. And yes, the Democratic party will wither on the vine if they don't change their ways. It may take a while, but it will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. By sowing seed I meant showing that they are there for us if we
get fed up.

Back in 2000 I though: "why would I leave my party?" but the concept of making such a decision had been introduced.

If things continue to go poorly for the left wing of our party I can see the temptation to leave the party grow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. do or die time for the Democratic party

if the party implodes with more sellouts to corporate power
i think people are gonna really start looking for other options

that's why we have to get rid of the dlc losers and take our
party back


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adjoran Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Greens are trying to build a viable party
In Europe, they have succeeded, but the continent has long been the home of multi-party democracy. In America, no party has ever become viable without having the effect of killing off the weaker of the two major parties. If they don't do that, they wither on the vine.

The Whigs emerged from the ashes of the Federalists. The Repubs killed off the Whigs. Since then, no party has succeeded.

The progressive Bullmoose Party lived only as long as TR was their leader, returning the repub fold eventually. The Populists suffered a similar fate and were swallowed up by the Democrats.

The Greens only practical hope is to siphon off enough progressives from the Democrats to weaken and eventually kill the party. While a real threat, it is important to remember that the Democratic Party is the oldest continous political party in history.

The nature of our system requires that it will always devolve back into a two-party contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. The bottom 75% income group has been marignalized to irrelevancy

It doesn't really matter what the concerns of low income and minority people are, the lower in income you go, the more percentage have been for all practical purposes disenfranchised.

No candidate who has corporate money has anything to offer this segment of the population, what their concerns are is irrelevant. Generally, the concerns have to do with a right to housing and a Living Wage.

The trend is toward costlier housing and lower wages, which will increase profits for the top 1% income group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC