Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Saturday Night Massacre happened on April 20, 2005.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:22 PM
Original message
The Saturday Night Massacre happened on April 20, 2005.
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL JAMES B. COMEY ANNOUNCES RESIGNATION FROM THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT

April 20, 2005
United States Department of Justice
WWW.USDOJ.GOV

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey announced today that he intends to resign his position at the Department of Justice and return to the private sector this fall. Comey has served as the Deputy Attorney General since December 2003, following his nomination by President George W. Bush and his confirmation by a unanimous Senate. As Deputy Attorney General, Comey led the Justice Department's enormously successful Corporate Fraud Task Force, created Violent Crime Impact Teams in cities around the nation to rid the streets of violent criminals, and oversaw the day to day operation of the Department of Justice, and its more than 104,000 men and women, under two Attorneys General.
...
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/ohs/Press/04-20-05.htm


Steven Comey is Patrick Fitzgerald's best friend and boss. My guess is that they're going to replace him with someone like Ted Olson.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow. Missed that little detail.
Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Now I know why Bush and Rove are still smirking.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bush could fire Comey, but he can't fire Fitzgerald now without
creating a firestorm that would surely bring him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He doesn't have to fire Fitzgerald after Comey resigns.
Comey's replacement can order Fitzgerald to do whatever Bush wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think the special prosecutor is more autonomous than that.
For one thing, he has his own budget and doesn't have to go through DOJ to issue his subpoenas, IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That was true when our govt operated under the rule of law.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You know, that's a great quote for so much these days.
Mind if I borrow it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Certainly.
And hopefully someday it will be obsolete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. he'll probably get killed like John O'Neill
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 05:01 PM by wli
A lot of people have been showing up dead when they get too close to the truth.

Edited to correct the first name of the FBI agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I do advise no small aircraft
that seems to be the way the good die young....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. huh? Paul O'Neill isn't dead
they're crazy, but they ain't THAT crazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think it should be John O'Neill, not Paul.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. But this special prosecutor was given a specific investigation and
if he exceeds that investigation, he can be fired. Unlike Starr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
46. It might involve a choice between which firestorm to face
I would bet that the Bush Administration has at least one or two moles on Fitzgerald's legal team, someone with access to the files. If they see a truly frightening scenario for them on the horizon, including indictments and a very messy, public trial that reaches into the White House, they may decide that they'd rather try to spin their way out of transferring, replacing, or firing Fitzgerald. If it means escaping indictments, I think this bunch is capable of anything. And the media won't see a burning story anymore if there's no juicy trial in the cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. "capable of anything"
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's what happened on April 19, 2005
"(AP) Two reporters facing jail for refusing to divulge their sources about the leak of an undercover CIA officer's name lost on Tuesday in federal court for the third time."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/04/19/national/main689545.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for that! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You're welcome but it has me very upset.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. How did you come across this tidbit? Just curious. It is very
interesting and it does explain why we actually have a good prosecutor (hopefully) on the case.

I was wondering how in the world that happened because it seemed so unusual with Ashcroft in charge of the Justice Dept. at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I was curious and Googled.
I started by Googling about Fitzgerald's appointment and went from there, following the trail of my intuition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Nice work. It would be nice for some intrepid reporter to start doing
some digging on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. crispini found it too but her post was buried in a thread and not
receiving the attention I thought it needed. So I'm really just a co-discoverer. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. Good find.
I share your concern. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Thanks.
We'd be toast without the internet and Google. At least now we have a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. He said this fall........
Is that when the GJ will be thru and issue their indictments? At that point, I don't think anyone can turn the clock back....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. "before Labor Day."
and this is how the Bush Administration operates:

"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Rove is getting smeared up and down in this country
Will Fitzpatrick and his Boss stay silent on this? I believe indictments are coming forth. You can't pick up humpty's dumpty shells, they are broke, his reputation is crap. I just don't think this will die not matter who they bring in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I really hope you are right.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Me too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shelley806 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
41. Every time I read this quote I'm nauseated with goosebumps...these
people are so evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. more about Comey's departure
Mr. Comey Departs

Post
Monday, April 25, 2005; A18



THE ANNOUNCEMENT by Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey Jr. that he will step down this fall is not a surprise. Mr. Comey resigned for personal reasons, and the department went out of its way to stress his warm relationship with Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales. But Mr. Comey, a career prosecutor known more for his law enforcement professionalism than for his conservative cre-

dentials, was not a particular favorite of the White House. His decision to appoint Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to probe an administration leak reportedly angered White House officials, and he appears to have played an important role as well in the withdrawal of the infamous torture memorandum. It is his independence and professionalism that will make Mr. Comey difficult to replace -- but those are the qualities President Bush should seek in a successor.

We didn't support everything Mr. Comey did. His decision to release disparaging but untested allegations against detained enemy combatant Jose Padilla, though meant to explain the difficult position the case put the government in, functioned as a smear to which Mr. Padilla could not respond. In the main, however, Mr. Comey -- like his predecessor Larry D. Thompson -- provided welcome moderation and managerial competence in a department whose leadership was prone to excess and confrontation.

more:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/24/AR2005042400916_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Not comforting.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Two telling phrases there:
...was not a particular favorite of the White House...

...provided welcome moderation and managerial competence in a department whose leadership was prone to excess and confrontation...




Sounds like reasons 1 and 2 that the WH would want him to "return to the private sector".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. And a third telling comment...
"His decision to appoint Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to probe an administration leak reportedly angered White House officials"

No shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. I have long wondered how Fitz. got appointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
52. This part really stud out at me
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 01:37 AM by FreedomAngel82
<dentials, was not a particular favorite of the White House. His decision to appoint Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to probe an administration leak reportedly angered White House officials, and he appears to have played an important role as well in the withdrawal of the infamous torture memorandum. It is his independence and professionalism that will make Mr. Comey difficult to replace -- but those are the qualities President Bush should seek in a successor.>

So they appointed Fitzgerald. Did he do that before he made his announcement to leave or after? If he did it after maybe it was payback? I think if they do fire Fitzgerald at this point it would be a bad sign because it would show the public, I think, that they are guilty and Rove is guilty especially. The judge already said earlier this week that it was a consperiacy against Wilson. So this wouldn't be a smart move. Just like Rove couldn't resign at this point because he's so close to the Bush camp ("Bush's brain") and it would make people realize he is guilty and now they are trying to show he is innocent (heh).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. It appears that Comey has stayed on long enough to watch Fitzgerald's
back through the Grand Jury and indictments. That's one read on it. But we know too little about the situation to make guesses as to what might really be going on. One key will be who gets indicted, and for what. Cheney, his aides and advisors, and the White House Iraq Group, were clearly out to destroy any objective, independent information and views within government, and especially within the CIA (many of whom opposed the cooking of intel and the unjustified, hare-brained, murderous, thieving war in Iraq). The Bush Cartel is pursuing its own nefarious interests and has no concept whatsoever of allegiance to the U.S. of A. and its people. Some people in the CIA apparently still do (or did at the time of the intel purges and the Plame outing). That is what is going on here.

But Fitzgerald will really have to have his ducks in a row, and great inner strength, to go after the real culprits. If the prosecution fails, or if Rove is permitted to fall on his sword to protect the others (or is being sacrificed by the others toward that end - with promises of presidential pardon and rich rewards later), it may or may not be Fitzgerald's fault. The culprits here are the most powerful and worst evildoers we have ever seen in government. We just don't know what Fitzgerald knows, or how solid his case is, or how high up it goes, or what his goals are, or who-all may be watching his back through all of this, or what influences or tactics might be used against him, his team, their families, the judges who may become involved, etc. etc. And the whole thing, it seems to me, is a terribly iffy hope on which to base any plan to recover our democracy.

We need to be wary of the "knight on a white horse" syndrome--that someone else, some leader, is going to rescue us from this fascist coup.

And what if this prosecution goes after the real culprits and succeeds--and this particular gang of tyrants comes tumbling down? Will we have recovered our democracy yet? What is to prevent the NEXT tyranny from using the same methods and the same powers to make war and to make lots and lots and lots and lots of money from the deaths of others? How are we going to prevent this from happening again? Even with the Bush Cartel in disrepute, and out of power, the mechanisms of usurpation remain, including Bushite voting machine company control over our elections with secret, proprietary programming code! (--an outrage that is very difficult to change, due to bipartisan corruption in the big business deals that our election systems have become).

True, it would be a great day to see true justice done in the case of the Bush Cartel, or, barring true justice, to see them at least ousted and disempowered. I can't say my heart won't leap for joy! But we have a long term battle in our country to regain our democracy, restore majority rule and put our country on the right path toward peace and justice.

I think that the only mechanism left to us, for recovering our democracy, is state/local election reform. Restoring our right to vote is a first and essential step. We must throw these Bushite electronic voting machine companies--Diebold, ES&S and brethren--out of the election business NOW--or, at the least, achieve some measure of election transparency with paper ballot backups, no secret programming code and strict auditing. And the only place where we can get that done is in state/local jurisdictions, where the authority over election systems still resides, and where ordinary people still have some say. See the DU Forum "2004 Election Results and Discussion" for information and action ideas:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Thank you for those wise and inspiring words.
I wish Andy were still here to help. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. I genuinely believe there are too many eyes on this administration,...
,...for them to get away with pulling the kind of actions we fear.

Fully acknowledging the extremism presented by this administration, I still believe this country will NOT tolerate dictatorship.

If you really think about the whole picture, we are akin to the Vietnam path, fast forward. We're moving so much more quickly than before.

I have great faith. I view these bastards as the crisis which provokes this whole country into the kind of change that should have happened some time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. These people pulled off a coup in 2000 and more.
But I hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. True conservatives, real Republicans are abandoning ship.
Hell, they're coming out and publishing opposition.

These bastards in charge do NOT represent this country and their constituents KNOW IT.

The BushCo/neoCON regime is going down. I have no doubt about that because real Americans know they are operating like a damned dictatorship. My only concern is, will we all look in the mirror, do the serious self-examination that we MUST, as a country, engage in to be the "light" of the world. We lost our balance,...hopefully, we will INTENTIONALLY find it through this experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Hopefully we can have a Truth Commission.
And perhaps a Profiterring Restitution Commission as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Huh? Were you being sarcastic or cynical or what?
:shrug:

Have you basically given up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. None of the above.
I think we need to have a Truth Commission to expose all of the evil of the BFEE and a Profiteering Restitution Commission to restore all of the money they stole from the USA. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Me, too. Sorry. I'd like to see civilian boards set up for oversight.
Something outside the beltway, which has become entirely too boxed to be effective in ensuring their own honesty and accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. "outside the beltway" is key.
Do they put something in the water?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. maybe it's a positive?
If Fitzgerald's boss isn't able to be intimidated, that seems like a a good thing. And maybe he said "resign in the fall" because that is when Fitzgerald should be wrapped up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Or,
if things don't go well they can say his resignation was planned long before xxx happened and had nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #32
54. That's another point too
He could be having a cop out or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
53. That could be it
Things seem to be going pretty fast with this investigation now. Maybe from 2003 to 2004 he was working on the case and preparing and now it looks as if he is questioning more people and presenting his case to the judge. Maybe by the end of the fall we'll have the case closed and people in jail. That's what it feels like anyways (that things are going fast).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. Interesting thread, thanks to ALL contributors. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
50. Saturday Night Massacre II?
This is interesting. Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. You're welcome.
Let's hope it backfires like the first one. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC